• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Official Player Factions Liberty [LN] Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (139): « Previous 1 … 105 106 107 108 109 … 139 Next »
Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread
Offline Teerin
06-26-2015, 05:29 AM,
#1,061
Member
Posts: 898
Threads: 102
Joined: Apr 2012

Kudos back!

While I wasn't there for the initial roleplay, it was still fun to come in with Mehndi being himself and Sius going a tad bit into the deep end.

As for the numbers, yeah let's do better next time. We were all a bit uncertain when to shoot because of what was happening to Remus, and my own character getting a bit irritated due to the inaction of the rest. Make Heathen due some sort of MD report, by the way, since we let him run off. Should be fun to read!
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
07-23-2015, 01:40 AM,
#1,062
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,549
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

This is a total joke

There is not a single military service on this entire planet that would allow an Admiral to speak their mind publicly and still remain at their post.

If the Navy wanted to maintain credibility they should have demoted the admiral, there is nothing preventing the player behind the character from creating a new Admiral to reflect their position within the Liberty Navy.

Punishment would be handed out and far less people would be upset; however the path the Liberty Navy (and by extension the Liberty Government) has taken tells me that the Liberty Government is nothing more than a joke that exists to only benefit those "in the know"
Reply  
Offline Sarawr!?
07-23-2015, 01:53 AM,
#1,063
THE LAWH
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 117
Joined: Oct 2008

This is not a real military, this is not based on a real military, this is a fictional military organization within a rather loose sci-fi setting. Think of Mass Effect if you want, plenty of things happened in there in regard to military discipline and the suchlike that would certainly not happen in real life. Was it still enjoyable? Hell yes it was.

This is not real life. This is the only comment I'm going to make here.

[Image: CHI4y9i.png]
[LN] Recruitment | Rachel Baker Bio

Reply  
Offline Wildkins
07-23-2015, 02:00 AM,
#1,064
Freeport 3
Posts: 1,943
Threads: 175
Joined: Feb 2013

(07-23-2015, 01:40 AM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: This is a total joke

There is not a single military service on this entire planet that would allow an Admiral to speak their mind publicly and still remain at their post.

If the Navy wanted to maintain credibility they should have demoted the admiral, there is nothing preventing the player behind the character from creating a new Admiral to reflect their position within the Liberty Navy.

Punishment would be handed out and far less people would be upset; however the path the Liberty Navy (and by extension the Liberty Government) has taken tells me that the Liberty Government is nothing more than a joke that exists to only benefit those "in the know"

Woah, slow down there, partner.

DoD Directives specifically state that members of the military may possess and read any material they want, including anti-war material. They may distribute any such material even if it is critical of government policies of officials. Distribution may be limited - but not ceased - if the material presents "a clear and present danger to the loyalty, discipline, or morale of military personnel." That's 1325.6, for those interested.

1325.6 also states that military members' "right of expression" is preserved, including peaceful demonstrations against the government or the war, as long as it is done away from a military installation, while off duty, and out of uniform.

The only issue I've found that conflicts with what Baker has done here is covered under the UCMJ, which states that it is illegal to communicate "with the enemy", although the examples they give specifically refer to letters and other types of methods of communication. I'm willing to give a pass on this one, as this is less a communication with the enemy and more a propaganda-filled message/speech. Think the attempts at anti-propaganda the US has been creating recently.

Is it perhaps out of character for an Admiral? Probably, yes. But Baker has never been a traditional Admiral. I'm still thinking on whether or not she'll be punished inRP for her..."zealous" action, but I'm honestly leaning towards a no. I still think this situation is horribly overblown and not as serious as everyone is taking it, but maybe I'm wrong.

RP Feedback
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
07-23-2015, 02:19 AM,
#1,065
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,549
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: 1325.6 also states that military members' "right of expression" is preserved, including peaceful demonstrations against the government or the war, as long as it is done away from a military installation, while off duty, and out of uniform.

So by your example using a government e-mail address to publicly communicate with an enemy group doesn't count (assuming the T-bars which have Liberty Navy stamped all over them counts as government representation)
(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: The only issue I've found that conflicts with what Baker has done here is covered under the UCMJ, which states that it is illegal to communicate "with the enemy", although the examples they give specifically refer to letters and other types of methods of communication. I'm willing to give a pass on this one, as this is less a communication with the enemy and more a propaganda-filled message/speech. Think the attempts at anti-propaganda the US has been creating recently.

Propaganda doesn't start with legitimatizing the enemies operations and end with throwing other supporting organizations under the bus.
(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: Is it perhaps out of character for an Admiral? Probably, yes. But Baker has never been a traditional Admiral. I'm still thinking on whether or not she'll be punished inRP for her..."zealous" action, but I'm honestly leaning towards a no. I still think this situation is horribly overblown and not as serious as everyone is taking it, but maybe I'm wrong.

An Admiral de-legitimatized the Liberty Government and legitimatized the Commonwealth all within one transmission. You can claim that its propaganda but it doesn't read as such to me.
Reply  
Offline Wildkins
07-23-2015, 02:25 AM,
#1,066
Freeport 3
Posts: 1,943
Threads: 175
Joined: Feb 2013

(07-23-2015, 02:19 AM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:
(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: 1325.6 also states that military members' "right of expression" is preserved, including peaceful demonstrations against the government or the war, as long as it is done away from a military installation, while off duty, and out of uniform.

So by your example using a government e-mail address to publicly communicate with an enemy group doesn't count (assuming the T-bars which have Liberty Navy stamped all over them counts as government representation)
(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: The only issue I've found that conflicts with what Baker has done here is covered under the UCMJ, which states that it is illegal to communicate "with the enemy", although the examples they give specifically refer to letters and other types of methods of communication. I'm willing to give a pass on this one, as this is less a communication with the enemy and more a propaganda-filled message/speech. Think the attempts at anti-propaganda the US has been creating recently.

Propaganda doesn't start with legitimatizing the enemies operations and end with throwing other supporting organizations under the bus.
(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: Is it perhaps out of character for an Admiral? Probably, yes. But Baker has never been a traditional Admiral. I'm still thinking on whether or not she'll be punished inRP for her..."zealous" action, but I'm honestly leaning towards a no. I still think this situation is horribly overblown and not as serious as everyone is taking it, but maybe I'm wrong.

An Admiral de-legitimatized the Liberty Government and legitimatized the Commonwealth all within one transmission. You can claim that its propaganda but it doesn't read as such to me.

Then that's your opinion, man. I can't help you with that.

RP Feedback
Reply  
Offline Tokoloshe
07-23-2015, 02:29 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-23-2015, 02:29 AM by Tokoloshe.)
#1,067
Banned
Posts: 9
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2015

(07-23-2015, 01:53 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: This is not a real military, this is not based on a real military, this is a fictional military organization within a rather loose sci-fi setting. Think of Mass Effect if you want, plenty of things happened in there in regard to military discipline and the suchlike that would certainly not happen in real life. Was it still enjoyable? Hell yes it was.

This is not real life. This is the only comment I'm going to make here.

No really? This isn't real? Damn, we thought it was!

I think this is people telling you that they are not interested in seeing any more of your particular brand of fiction.

User was banned for: Karlotta
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Sarawr!?
07-23-2015, 02:30 AM,
#1,068
THE LAWH
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 117
Joined: Oct 2008

(07-23-2015, 02:19 AM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: An Admiral de-legitimatized the Liberty Government and legitimatized the Commonwealth all within one transmission. You can claim that its propaganda but it doesn't read as such to me.

Rachel Baker Wrote:[indent]

Should we simply forget the way of the Hellfire Legion now that they've given themselves some fancy new name? I say to hell with that!

The Government of The Republic of Liberty already provides the following:
- A Nationalized Healthcare Program accessible to each and every Citizen of The Republic.
- Government funding for Secondary Education, provided applicants meet educational requirements.
- Equal Civil Rights for all, regardless of race, religion, creed, sexual orientation, and so on.
- Dozens Of Social Welfare Assistance Programs for those who struggle economically.

Legionaries! You fight for nothing, your cause is a fallacy, and your leaders are deluded...seeking only to seize power as the world around them stands at the edge of chaos!

Those of you raised in The Republic should well know all of this, so why do you continue to believe the lies and vitriole of TYRANTS who fancy themselves the leaders of a "Commonwealth".

It may not be perfect, but the system in place now is far from the "crumbling husk" that the leaders of your "Commonwealth" would have you believe it to be!

This "Commonwealth" is not a nation, and none of you should be willing to die for the lies of traitors and cowards. Sit and ask yourselves, do you really have faith in their ability to run a nation with billions of citizens? Do you really think that it would end in anything but chaos, were you to try and replace the entire military and government of The Republic?

Toss away your weapons and surrender while you can, while there's hope for you to return to living normal lives.[

[Image: CHI4y9i.png]
[LN] Recruitment | Rachel Baker Bio

Reply  
Offline Sarawr!?
07-23-2015, 02:33 AM,
#1,069
THE LAWH
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 117
Joined: Oct 2008

(07-23-2015, 02:29 AM)Tokoloshe Wrote:
(07-23-2015, 01:53 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: This is not a real military, this is not based on a real military, this is a fictional military organization within a rather loose sci-fi setting. Think of Mass Effect if you want, plenty of things happened in there in regard to military discipline and the suchlike that would certainly not happen in real life. Was it still enjoyable? Hell yes it was.

This is not real life. This is the only comment I'm going to make here.

No really? This isn't real? Damn, we thought it was!

I think this is people telling you that they are not interested in seeing any more of your particular brand of fiction.

Let me lay it out pretty simply for you then -- I do not care. If you do not enjoy my writing, or the personalities of my characters, and the things I'm doing have nothing to do with you, DO NOT INVOLVE YOURSELF.

[Image: CHI4y9i.png]
[LN] Recruitment | Rachel Baker Bio

Reply  
Offline Tokoloshe
07-23-2015, 02:38 AM,
#1,070
Banned
Posts: 9
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2015

(07-23-2015, 02:33 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: Let me lay it out pretty simply for you then -- I do not care. If you do not enjoy my writing, or the personalities of my characters, and the things I'm doing have nothing to do with you, DO NOT INVOLVE YOURSELF.

Then allow me to not care either, by not making people like you the people who officially define faction diplomacy. Sheesh I wish I couldn't care about anything you posted. God knows I do.

User was banned for: Karlotta
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Pages (139): « Previous 1 … 105 106 107 108 109 … 139 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode