• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 89 90 91 92 93 … 780 Next »
XA - Bowing out gracefully

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
XA - Bowing out gracefully
Offline nOmnomnOm
11-18-2015, 08:57 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-18-2015, 08:57 PM by The Archangels Fighter Club.)
#21
Probation
Posts: 5,913
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

(11-18-2015, 07:23 PM)Evo Wrote:
(11-18-2015, 08:12 AM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: I think you guys are being a little too emo here Tongue
While I partially agree that yeah people left ... I do think as well that its not the best move to dump off XA like this. It is a good faction, right? All it really needs is some advertising and 2 guys logging to get some attention!

But then again ... Your call... Though yeah, pob when your faction is down isn't the best idea.

The thing is, XA really doesn't draw people at all like other factions. Nor does it retain. That was always the case, just because of how it was us vs. the world whenever we logged. We used to have a steady activity wave. Every 3 or so months we would have an activity spike, after that it would drop for another 3. I noticed we stopped getting the upswing quite a while ago. It's not really a question of numbers, though they do definitely help, it's more that we lost the core thing our faction does.

There aren't enough trade ships. The major draw of our faction and what we do to accomplish our goal simply isn't there. XA isn't really a pvpwhore faction and never was. Yet recently, disco is all pvp. Space doesn't feel big anymore. We tried branching out with smuggling to Corsair buddies, mining premium scrap and other stuff, yet nobody was really interested.

odd becasue the xeno ID literally screams pvp and chaos...
Reply  
Offline Evo
11-18-2015, 09:24 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 728
Threads: 59
Joined: Aug 2012

(11-18-2015, 08:57 PM)The Archangels Fighter Club Wrote:
(11-18-2015, 07:23 PM)Evo Wrote:
(11-18-2015, 08:12 AM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: I think you guys are being a little too emo here Tongue
While I partially agree that yeah people left ... I do think as well that its not the best move to dump off XA like this. It is a good faction, right? All it really needs is some advertising and 2 guys logging to get some attention!

But then again ... Your call... Though yeah, pob when your faction is down isn't the best idea.

The thing is, XA really doesn't draw people at all like other factions. Nor does it retain. That was always the case, just because of how it was us vs. the world whenever we logged. We used to have a steady activity wave. Every 3 or so months we would have an activity spike, after that it would drop for another 3. I noticed we stopped getting the upswing quite a while ago. It's not really a question of numbers, though they do definitely help, it's more that we lost the core thing our faction does.

There aren't enough trade ships. The major draw of our faction and what we do to accomplish our goal simply isn't there. XA isn't really a pvpwhore faction and never was. Yet recently, disco is all pvp. Space doesn't feel big anymore. We tried branching out with smuggling to Corsair buddies, mining premium scrap and other stuff, yet nobody was really interested.

odd becasue the xeno ID literally screams pvp and chaos...


edit: Should be nOmnomnOm account. forgot to switch.

Oddly enough we didn't really attract many pvpwhores. Probably because no sabrus or outcast ships.
Reply  
Offline Swifty
11-18-2015, 09:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-18-2015, 09:30 PM by Swifty.)
#23
Probation
Posts: 593
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2013

(11-18-2015, 12:33 PM)sindroms Wrote: Remember when people traded rice instead of buffed commodities? And took Helium to Kusari? You could pester those.
Man, those were the days.

Those were the days indeed...

RIP Xenos, you will remain in the history book of Disco. I tried to be active for you, kickin' the ball out of congress and other stuff, but couldn't really make a difference on my own. Love you guys.

~XA-Nigel

[Image: tzTtDD9.gif]
Reply  
Offline Arbs
11-18-2015, 09:38 PM,
#24
Member
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 67
Joined: Nov 2013

Really saddens me to see XA- go :/ awesome faction.


[Image: vNjURnU.png?1]

"If your heart is filled with faith, then you can't fear."

Fleet Admiral Alan Jones

[Image: Flag-liberty.png]Liberty Navy [LN]
Information | Liberty forces message dump | Recruitment | Feedback

Reply  
Offline Alley
11-18-2015, 11:16 PM,
#25
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(11-18-2015, 08:17 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Yeah, how will depots work exactly? As the leader of a faction with a POB, I'm greatly interested in how much a depot could work in comparison.

Very little upkeep, can't build advanced facilities, slightly easier to destroy.
You'll be able to evolve them into specialized bases though.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline SystemsFailing
11-19-2015, 12:47 AM,
#26
Member
Posts: 160
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2012

(11-18-2015, 09:24 PM)Evo Wrote: Oddly enough we didn't really attract many pvpwhores. Probably because no sabrus or outcast ships.
Naive conclusion.
It's more about reputation issues: why preferring Xeno ID over LH/LR/OC/FL/P ? Lacks flexibility, if in short. In addition, no worthy exclusive tech to go for as well.
It's not a red-is-dead ID either to cover up the costs.
Reply  
Offline |nfrared
11-19-2015, 12:56 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-19-2015, 01:16 AM by |nfrared.)
#27
Member
Posts: 588
Threads: 62
Joined: Jan 2014

(11-19-2015, 12:47 AM)SystemsFailing Wrote:
(11-18-2015, 09:24 PM)Evo Wrote: Oddly enough we didn't really attract many pvpwhores. Probably because no sabrus or outcast ships.
Naive conclusion.
It's more about reputation issues: why preferring Xeno ID over LH/LR/OC/FL/P ? Lacks flexibility, if in short. In addition, no worthy exclusive tech to go for as well.
It's not a red-is-dead ID either to cover up the costs.

The main reason I joined the XA is for the exact reasons you have described. I have always enjoyed being an underequipped and outgunned underdog, it makes those rare victories all the much sweeter. It doesn't matter how big the enemy's pixels are, it's how you use your pixels that counts.

Good times

In terms of being able to attack targets, the XA ID offers the most flexibility of them all, where even transports were not safe from being treated as combat targets, though I think the lack of gunships put alot of PvP orientated people off. However I'm pretty sure if any of us had been able to fly a roll of duct tape, we would have.

Shard - The Faceless One
Reply  
Offline SystemsFailing
11-19-2015, 01:17 AM,
#28
Member
Posts: 160
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2012

(11-19-2015, 12:56 AM)|nfrared Wrote: The main reason I joined the XA is for the exact reasons you have described. I have always enjoyed being an underequipped and outgunned underdog, it makes those rare victories all the much sweeter. It doesn't matter how big the enemy's pixels are, it's how you use your pixels that counts.

Good times

In terms of being able to attack targets, the XA ID offers the most flexibility of them all, where even transports where not safe from being treated as combat targets. I'm sure if any of us had been able to fly a roll of duct tape, we would have.

Don't get me wrong: it's not about civtech being anyhow underpowered nor being outnumbered is a huge problem, it's about having heavily restricted docking rights and overall geotactic00l possibilities. Duct tape-talks would better fit nomad/LR tech ;-)
Transports are not of any competition in terms of combat.
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
11-19-2015, 02:46 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-19-2015, 02:51 AM by Lythrilux.)
#29
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,369
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(11-18-2015, 08:57 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: odd becasue the xeno ID literally screams pvp and chaos...

The issue is other IDs (not just Liberty IDs) can do that more and have access to a wider and better spectrum of ships. From a gameplay perspective the Xeno ID is sub par to other unlawful IDs. Shooting Liberty Lawfuls, especially DiscoveryGC Liberty Lawfuls, becomes a tedious and droning exercise after a while. Same applies for fighting unlawfuls too. Xenos are an interesting faction with very interesting RP, unfortunately there's too many negative factors that prevent it from being as attractive as it's peers to the average player. Attempts have been made to improve the situation, but they haven't really lead anywhere.

tl;dr Xeno RP is fun but people don't enjoy being constantly out gunned and out numbered when they could have an easier and potentially more enjoyable time on i.e the Rogue ID.

(11-18-2015, 11:16 PM)Alley Wrote: Very little upkeep, can't build advanced facilities, slightly easier to destroy. You'll be able to evolve them into specialized bases though.

What sort of specialised bases are possible? Would it be like an RPG skill tree where a character is lead down the path into a specialised role? (happy)

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode