• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 81 82 83 84 85 … 547 Next »
Intelligence Faction cloaks (suggestion)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Intelligence Faction cloaks (suggestion)
Offline WesternPeregrine
12-16-2015, 04:20 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-17-2015, 08:45 PM by WesternPeregrine.)
#1
Kusari Vanguard
Posts: 2,312
Threads: 166
Joined: Oct 2013

Following a thought that most POB derived equipment creation just follows gameplay mechanics, and does not answer in any way to roleplay of disco ( I think), I considered an alternative.
Since (some) people are adverse to castrating the perceived use of POBs ingame (since they can't be used solely for trade depot), I forward a suggestion of replicating cloak equipment to be sold at specific house intelligence bases (navy bases with the intelligence ID).
I don't care much about the stats of these cloaks in comparison to the common ones (earned with hardwork/ powertrading cash). They could have their stats pegged to the common ones, or slightly weaker than POB ones (to make those retain their worth?).
It would be a kind of perk for intelligence factions, like police get tlagsnet (and /nodock), and Military get full shipline.


Some of the characteristics that would define this alternative cloaks:

- Sold only at a specific military base or research facility.
- Buyable by all IDs OR Only to certain IDs (Intelligence factions, Military counterparts, Police ?)
- Fully compatible with the Intelligence ID of all houses (OR 100% for Official faction IDs, and 80 % to indie intelligence ?)
- Partial compatibility with military IDs of all Houses (it's sort of intelligence ID perk, so 75% or lower for Military, Police ?)
- If allowed to be bought/purchased by other IDs, ships get 1% compatibility. You might have found a cloak for your RP, but it's quite useless for combat, and the House Law enforcement will hunt you down in most cases.
- Could be granted as a perk for official factions.
- Could be granted to some additional factions that might have lore background akin to the intelligence faction research (Order, House Military without Intelligence faction counterpart, maybe).
- Perhaps create only fighter and gunboat class cloaks, and leave the higher classes in need of POB cloaks.

For all other cases, you always have the POB cloaks at your disposal.

It might be an elitist thing, but it doesn't remove the current alternatives.

[+]SIGNATURE
Kusari Former Mastermind
========================
| The Kusari Legal Codex |
| Character Profiles | The North Star Bulletin News|
[Image: 5tZIDB3.jpg]

-
Reply  
Online sindroms
12-16-2015, 04:25 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 9,438
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

Using cloaks to collect RP data is a bad move and should not be done in general.
Not even by intelligence factions.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
12-16-2015, 04:49 PM,
#3
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Being invisible and avoiding interaction in a game that heavily depends on interaction.

Find the mistake.

Furthermore +1 to what Spazzy wrote: cloaked spying is a big nono, furthermore it is dirt cheap and fool-proof. So where is the fun?

Cloaks should never have been introduced.
They are harmful to gameplay.
Therefore a proliferation of them is not a good idea in my opinion.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline The Savage
12-16-2015, 04:55 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-16-2015, 04:56 PM by The Savage.)
#4
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

What about device that "muffles" the visibility on radar range, with people using such a device being visible only within 5K range?
Reply  
Offline Laz
12-16-2015, 04:56 PM,
#5
Out-of Retirement Code Monkey
Posts: 1,912
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2014

I think the idea is nice*, not just that BS last likr 5 mins, i think fighter should last 45 seconds, gunboat lasts 1 min 25 seconds. And BS last 2 mins.

*I mean that the idea of cloaks, not avoiding interactions.

Reply  
Offline Laz
12-16-2015, 04:57 PM,
#6
Out-of Retirement Code Monkey
Posts: 1,912
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2014

Also in addition thats probably why the idea of power down engine never went though.
Cause think we can see wreaks and they not no power....

Reply  
Offline The Savage
12-16-2015, 05:01 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-16-2015, 05:03 PM by The Savage.)
#7
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

@Laz No. Absolutely no. 4 minutes of being cloaked (MkII) is not enough in scale of Disco. We don't want further nerfs, which breaks the already broken Cloak even more.
Reply  
Offline Laz
12-16-2015, 05:05 PM,
#8
Out-of Retirement Code Monkey
Posts: 1,912
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2014

@"FluffReborn" As much as i understand your point of view, the only way we will get people to *FINALLY* stop arguing, is where we dont take drastic measures, (see OP) and dont do anything at all.

Reply  
Online sindroms
12-16-2015, 05:13 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 9,438
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

I always thought that cloaks should only remove your name from someones scanner. Not remove you visually.
Imagine a pirate engaging that sort of cloak to sneak up on miners in fields, using rocks as a cover.

That would also mean that people would have more success with small ships due to obvious reasons..

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline The Savage
12-16-2015, 05:15 PM,
#10
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

(12-16-2015, 05:13 PM)sindroms Wrote: I always thought that cloaks should only remove your name from someones scanner. Not remove you visually.
Imagine a pirate engaging that sort of cloak to sneak up on miners in fields, using rocks as a cover.
(12-16-2015, 04:55 PM)FluffReborn Wrote: What about device that "muffles" the visibility on radar range, with people using such a device being visible only within 5K range?
Reply  
Pages (5): 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode