• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 28 Next »
CORE Dreadnought

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Which one do you prefer?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
First
16.98%
9 16.98%
Second
60.38%
32 60.38%
Neither
22.64%
12 22.64%
Total 53 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »
CORE Dreadnought
Offline Unlucky_Soul
01-31-2016, 05:39 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 622
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2013

(01-31-2016, 05:24 PM)Lennox Wrote: am I missing a plugin? All i can see are two white blank boxes

check your graphic card's drivers

[Image: oNG6Z9E.gif]
Reply  
Offline Durandal
01-31-2016, 06:57 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

The second model is very nice, but I'm loathe to add yet another warship with a forward gun to the game.
Reply  
Offline Alley
01-31-2016, 07:02 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(01-31-2016, 06:57 PM)Durandal Wrote: The second model is very nice, but I'm loathe to add yet another warship with a forward gun to the game.

I don't really mind its presence but we should stop adding dedicated forward gun weapons. They should just be mortar/heavy mortar slots.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Oldum
01-31-2016, 07:15 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 1,357
Threads: 87
Joined: Apr 2009

#2 looks sexy as hell , but doesn't it look a little fragile for a dreadnought? Tongue

[Image: kIHP9wI.png]
| Faction Information || Recruitment || Feedback || Internal Communications || Nightmare on Shetland |
| The Mindoro Massacre |
Reply  
Offline Unlucky_Soul
01-31-2016, 07:38 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 622
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2013

(01-31-2016, 06:57 PM)Durandal Wrote: The second model is very nice, but I'm loathe to add yet another warship with a forward gun to the game.

NP. That can be removed Smile

[Image: oNG6Z9E.gif]
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
01-31-2016, 07:58 PM,
#16
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

What's wrong with adding more forward guns?

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Cælumaresh
01-31-2016, 10:56 PM,
#17
Protector of Humanity
Posts: 1,603
Threads: 148
Joined: Feb 2012

(01-31-2016, 05:14 PM)Chuba Wrote: Second one is much nicer

This Galaxy is vast; its wonders and beauty are almost unfathomable. But the galaxy also hides dark secrets, some of which have lain dormant since the beginning of time itself. There is a danger in secrets, both in seeking and in knowing. Some things are meant to be hidden from view. Some mysteries defy understanding, and sometimes even the things we think we know are untrue. Some secrets should remain untouched.


Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  Reply  
Offline Mao
01-31-2016, 11:15 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 2,680
Threads: 165
Joined: Aug 2009

(01-31-2016, 07:58 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: What's wrong with adding more forward guns?
I'd also like to know this. It's not like they're balance breakers or something like that.

On topic: Model-wise, both are fine. The 2nd is sexier but none would actually fit the AP line.
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
01-31-2016, 11:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-31-2016, 11:21 PM by Jack_Henderson.)
#19
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

The 1st one looks more like a badass warship and would somehow fit the role better.
The 2nd one just looks nicer in terms of aesthetics, but does not look like a ship that can take punishing fire in battle.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Thunderer
01-31-2016, 11:30 PM,
#20
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,611
Threads: 463
Joined: Jul 2011

(01-31-2016, 07:58 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: What's wrong with adding more forward guns?

I'd actually refrain from it until they are fixed. All forward guns have the bug that sometimes you see them hit and do damage, but your target sees them miss and do damage. Or, you see them miss and not do damage, while your target sees them hit and not do damage. It is really difficult to avoid a projectile if you don't know where it is going.

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Reply  
Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode