• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 71 72 73 74 75 … 547 Next »
Roleplay oriented cargo [Implementation Next Update]

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Roleplay oriented cargo [Implementation Next Update]
Offline Thyrzul
02-21-2016, 01:08 PM,
#21
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(02-21-2016, 05:39 AM)Xoria Wrote:
(02-21-2016, 01:29 AM)Thyrzul Wrote: How about 50 cargo and 125k cr each? Alternatively, different versions with various size/cost/significance for different ship sizes maybe?
I don't see why anyone would choose a more expensive, bulkier version when they could go cheap and save cargo space, so this will ultimately settle on one version of each.

I don't see why anyone would bother with any of these stuff if they care more about cost and cargo space than roleplay significance when they could afford any of the available options. Isn't this entire thread aimed at people caring about RP? If so, I'm not really convinced it would indeed settle on only the smaller and cheaper version, just write it into the description of bigger stuff that it is also a lot better and can do a lot more.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Apollon
02-21-2016, 02:16 PM,
#22
Emperor's Wrath
Posts: 1,772
Threads: 101
Joined: May 2012

I like it. To be fair, we need a lot more RP commodities, as they would provide much more RP opportunities.
Reply  
Offline Findarato Veneanar
02-21-2016, 02:29 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 421
Threads: 15
Joined: Sep 2012

Commodities that take up lots of cargo space, cost a fair bit, and give no actual ingame benefit? right....

Signatures may not be bigger than 700x250, 1MB. ~Skorak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EddX9hnhDS4 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6623...%20Sig.png http://i.imgur.com/BpOtRCf.jpg -My stance on all the censorship in this community.
|:~ TBS ~:|:~ LMP ~:|:~ BMF ~:|:~ SW ~:|
  Reply  
Offline Croft
02-21-2016, 03:24 PM,
#24
Member
Posts: 1,642
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2011

No financial ingame benefit perhaps (unless stolen) but it helps RP situations simply by having commodities like these available.

Jimmy The Rat | Croft's Feedback | The Rat Pack
Reply  
Offline nOmnomnOm
02-21-2016, 08:13 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-21-2016, 08:13 PM by nOmnomnOm.)
#25
Probation
Posts: 5,914
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

(02-21-2016, 03:24 PM)Croft Wrote: No financial ingame benefit perhaps (unless stolen) but it helps RP situations simply by having commodities like these available.

example?

[Image: zBEqQfl.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Oldum
02-21-2016, 08:22 PM,
#26
Member
Posts: 1,357
Threads: 87
Joined: Apr 2009

(02-21-2016, 10:38 AM)LordVipex Wrote: As equipment takes up all but 4 cargo space on my research ship (Resheph with normal equipment, most efficient cloak and CAU8), this won't be particularly useful for me as it is proposed, but I can see it being useful for people who have the space available. The idea is really nice, but I also agree with Drrobe and Lyth on the issue of players attacking you for fast money, though this could also be a nice incentive for those carrying the equipment with them to defend themselves appropriately or give the attackers a better money-making alternative than destroying you.

//edit: It would be absolutely perfect if this was implemented without cargo space requirement at higher costs.

Or it would be about time to revise the cargo place mountable equipments ( cloaks , Scanners , JDs ) use, to allow ships to have a propper setup without having 0 cargo space left Tongue

[Image: kIHP9wI.png]
| Faction Information || Recruitment || Feedback || Internal Communications || Nightmare on Shetland |
| The Mindoro Massacre |
Reply  
Offline Croft
02-22-2016, 11:19 AM,
#27
Member
Posts: 1,642
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2011

(02-21-2016, 08:13 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:
(02-21-2016, 03:24 PM)Croft Wrote: No financial ingame benefit perhaps (unless stolen) but it helps RP situations simply by having commodities like these available.

example?

Someone RPing a researcher without the silly SRP'd ID could carry the research corps and survey teams, anyone who has a medical character could stock up on mobile medical kits and so on. Just by having something tangible opens up quite a few possbilities, randsoming the teams, stealing the equipment or just giving credance to a characters background.

Jimmy The Rat | Croft's Feedback | The Rat Pack
Reply  
Offline Xoria
02-26-2016, 07:40 PM,
#28
Black Hat Economist
Posts: 2,122
Threads: 244
Joined: Oct 2007
Staff roles:

My current plan, revised from the original, is to introduce each of the items in the first post, requiring 2 cargo units each, costing 100,000 per item. These will not be stack-able, so they will show up in cargo hold inventory the same way equipment does - each individual item separately. This is to reflect the fact that they are not merely items stored in a shipping container.
Reply  
Offline WesternPeregrine
02-26-2016, 07:57 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-26-2016, 08:04 PM by WesternPeregrine.)
#29
Kusari Vanguard
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 166
Joined: Oct 2013

(02-26-2016, 07:40 PM)Xoria Wrote: My current plan, revised from the original, is to introduce each of the items in the first post, requiring 2 cargo units each, costing 100,000 per item. These will not be stack-able, so they will show up in cargo hold inventory the same way equipment does - each individual item separately. This is to reflect the fact that they are not merely items stored in a shipping container.

Wont that maybe cause issues with very long lists of commodities?

[+]SIGNATURE
Kusari Former Mastermind
[Image: 5tZIDB3.jpg]
========================
| The Kusari Legal Codex |
| Character Profiles | The North Star Bulletin News|
Reply  
Offline Xoria
02-26-2016, 08:28 PM,
#30
Black Hat Economist
Posts: 2,122
Threads: 244
Joined: Oct 2007
Staff roles:

(02-26-2016, 07:57 PM)WPeregrine Wrote: Wont that maybe cause issues with very long lists of commodities?
Only if you carry that many. Part of the original concept of large cargo space requirements was to prevent carrying hundreds of them around. There's no reason for more than a few of any of these on the same ship.
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode