There's only one problem. The characters you listed don't belong to me. An Admin can check this for confirmation. Don't blame me for destroying your bases
This is starting to become harassment. Your group is targeting me and my friends in Gateway simply because I left BMF
(02-17-2016, 06:12 PM)Findarato Veneanar Wrote: Taxing pobs is indeed one of the worse parts of irl that have made its way into disco.
Its actually a really good means of income : )
As for the OP, no any lolwut can build a Core 1 base. 9 times out of 10 they don't even know how to RP on the forums. And inRP if a fresh instillation is in the middle of hostile territory or is built in a factions territory without permission it should blown up. You don't give notice before making something you claim to be your own in someone else's territory, it should be removed just as quickly by the people that own the territory.
(02-24-2016, 04:20 AM)VaaMerc Wrote: There's only one problem. The characters you listed don't belong to me. An Admin can check this for confirmation. Don't blame me for destroying your bases
This is starting to become harassment. Your group is targeting me and my friends in Gateway simply because I left BMF
We are so bad and targeting you ... i think we need to be punished so we decided to deliver you an apology
Here you go mate, you can show the universe that we are bad and targeting you
Trial by Forum is a no no. You should know better - St.Denis
Oh and thanks for confirming that you are Gateway Columbia via your previous reply
Without you mate, many things would have stayed unclear you are genius
(02-17-2016, 10:13 AM)St.Denis Wrote: It was decided, when the newest Rules on building Bases were introduced, that Building a POB did not require RP to building and therefore did not require any RP to destroy until it reached Core 2.
There have been many arguments back and forth, over the intervening years, and nothing has been changed.
I can suggest that you put in a Player Request for the Rule to be changed. The Admins may curse, as this is something else to process, but it is something that you can do.
The Admins will, eventually, vote on it and a decision will be given.
Note:
As pointed out by someone in this Thread, the Attackers can just put a quick post in the Attack Thread and achieve the same effect. All this change, if implemented, would do is give the Base Owner some visibility of who has attacked their Base. The outcome would still be the same as they could do this when the Base Owner(s) were not on the Server.
Why are you voting on the decision if you just said yourself that it would make pretty much 0 difference.
(02-17-2016, 06:12 PM)Findarato Veneanar Wrote: Taxing pobs is indeed one of the worse parts of irl that have made its way into disco.
Its actually a really good means of income : )
As for the OP, no any lolwut can build a Core 1 base. 9 times out of 10 they don't even know how to RP on the forums. And inRP if a fresh instillation is in the middle of hostile territory or is built in a factions territory without permission it should blown up. You don't give notice before making something you claim to be your own in someone else's territory, it should be removed just as quickly by the people that own the territory.
PoBs in general are bad and should be deleted.
I am against deleting POBs but i encourage implementing a new rule saying: RP is required to obtain a blue print for core 1 deploy and RP is required to destroy a core 1 base.
Think about it , it makes sense my friend.
(02-17-2016, 10:13 AM)St.Denis Wrote: It was decided, when the newest Rules on building Bases were introduced, that Building a POB did not require RP to building and therefore did not require any RP to destroy until it reached Core 2.
There have been many arguments back and forth, over the intervening years, and nothing has been changed.
I can suggest that you put in a Player Request for the Rule to be changed. The Admins may curse, as this is something else to process, but it is something that you can do.
The Admins will, eventually, vote on it and a decision will be given.
Note:
As pointed out by someone in this Thread, the Attackers can just put a quick post in the Attack Thread and achieve the same effect. All this change, if implemented, would do is give the Base Owner some visibility of who has attacked their Base. The outcome would still be the same as they could do this when the Base Owner(s) were not on the Server.
Why are you voting on the decision if you just said yourself that it would make pretty much 0 difference.
I said that if a Player's Request was submitted, the Admins would vote on it. This hasn't got to this stage, as a Player's Request as yet to be submitted.
Also, within that vote, we could amend the Request so that Core 1 Bases are more protected. But that would depend on how each Admin viewed the Request and what the majority outcome is. I cannot predict the future.
'I would like to be half as clever as some people like to believe they are' Life is full of disappointments, it is how we handle them that helps to define us, as a person
(02-24-2016, 09:15 AM)St.Denis Wrote: I said that if a Player's Request was submitted, the Admins would vote on it. This hasn't got to this stage, as a Player's Request as yet to be submitted.
I believe you'll now find a player request has been submitted regarding core 1 base rule modification
![[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4]](https://i.imgur.com/P6DLUCr.png?4)
![[Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]](https://i.imgur.com/AX5RcTh.png?4)
you are genius ![[+]](/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Spoiler
![[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]](http://i.imgur.com/9KgNaeX.png)
![[Image: xwkBvsU.png]](https://i.imgur.com/xwkBvsU.png)
![[Image: q5x9eiN.png]](http://i.imgur.com/q5x9eiN.png)
