• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 55 Next »
Broadsword needs to be upgraded

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Broadsword needs to be upgraded
Offline nOmnomnOm
05-12-2016, 03:31 AM,
#1
Probation
Posts: 5,914
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Broadsword

No one uses the bomber. :|
Why? very fat and it is not even a heavy bomber to compensate a little. What is up with those engines too? Who would think to do that? Why not put them on the bottom or something or inside?

The model needs an upgrade and so does the states and placements of the guns.

Please.

This ship right now is not used at all. I would be surprised if someone did use it.

[Image: zBEqQfl.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Durandal
05-12-2016, 03:41 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

This ship and the Upholder suffered from the same problems back in .85 and were about on par with each other. The Upholder got buffed, the Broadsword did not. Probably worth looking at, yes.
Reply  
Offline Ryus
05-12-2016, 03:47 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 152
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2013

I use it. Feel free to be surprised. Updating it would be nice.

Hello, I'm a signature


And I love you.
Reply  
Offline nOmnomnOm
05-12-2016, 03:54 AM,
#4
Probation
Posts: 5,914
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

(05-12-2016, 03:47 AM)Ryus Wrote: I use it. Feel free to be surprised. Updating it would be nice.

how's the experience?
Reply  
Offline Haste
05-12-2016, 04:25 PM,
#5
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,565
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

The Broadsword probably also uses its skinwrap shield bubble as its hull hitbox. It was an interesting anomaly when I composed a list of hull and shield volumes for future bomber changes.

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Reply  
Offline Ryus
05-12-2016, 08:47 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 152
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2013

(05-12-2016, 03:54 AM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:
(05-12-2016, 03:47 AM)Ryus Wrote: I use it. Feel free to be surprised. Updating it would be nice.

how's the experience?

All I ever really seem to fight in it are transports, which it is fine for. It feels big and slow for what it is.
Reply  
Offline The Archangels Fighter Club
05-12-2016, 08:51 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-12-2016, 08:51 PM by The Archangels Fighter Club.)
#7
Member
Posts: 1,283
Threads: 212
Joined: Feb 2014

(05-12-2016, 08:47 PM)Ryus Wrote: It feels big and slow for what it is.
then it should get an extra torpedo slot and be made into a heavy bomber and not a medium bomber

Wrong account should be @nOmnomnOm
Reply  
Offline sindroms
05-12-2016, 08:57 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-12-2016, 08:58 PM by sindroms.)
#8
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

I would suggest against doing so, unless you want the Lane Hackers to fall in the same problem as Rogues were before the Hyena revamp.
Rogues only had a heavy bomber and a light one at 90% core.

Lane hackers, however, can use a heavy bomber at 90% as the Waran, where the nerf is less noticeable. Give it a befitting buff, but leave it as a light bomber.


EDIT: Alternatively, you can go on with the suggestion I did back in LR- times and make all Zline ships with the exception of the Gunboat and Cruiser as generic pirate ships.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Sangria
05-13-2016, 07:31 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 284
Threads: 34
Joined: Nov 2007

(05-12-2016, 08:57 PM)sindroms Wrote: I would suggest against doing so, unless you want the Lane Hackers to fall in the same problem as Rogues were before the Hyena revamp.
Rogues only had a heavy bomber and a light one at 90% core.

Lane hackers, however, can use a heavy bomber at 90% as the Waran, where the nerf is less noticeable. Give it a befitting buff, but leave it as a light bomber.


EDIT: Alternatively, you can go on with the suggestion I did back in LR- times and make all Zline ships with the exception of the Gunboat and Cruiser as generic pirate ships.

Its a borderworld bomber just like the Cutlass.

Also, don't forget to check the Havoc II which is worse than the Broadsword.
  Reply  
Offline Antonio
05-13-2016, 07:34 PM,
#10
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,194
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

Have to agree. Broadsword is arguably the worst bomber in the game and definitely needs some love.

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode