What is wrong with gravedigging Flood?

[n00bl3t]

Perhaps I should have posted this in the new shiny administrator/moderation subforum, but I thought a rules discussion would be best first. (I'm not too sure how that subforum works either.)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[n00bl3t]

discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=73934

Any word on this continuing trend?

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[pillow]

Trigger happy mods with nothing better to do? I dont know. I dont see a point unless it genuinely violates a rule, or is somewhat offensive.

"Trigger-happy mods with nothing better to do."

Would've quoted, but I'm on my phone and can't be arsed.

Well, I'm on my PC now and can, in fact, quote.

[Swifty]

Go away both of you. Vanish.

---

[DarthBindo]

discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=73934

Any word on this continuing trend?

Interestingly enough, gravedigging a thread is neither explicitly nor implicitly in violation of the stated forum rules, which means we would be operating inside the "common law" area of Discovery, so to speak.
We would then have to question why a prohibition against gravedigging exists inside of Internet culture.
But frankly,

I'm on my phone and can't be arsed.

So let's just let it be.

The same reason why we roll our eyes whenever someone says that 84 was better.

.84 was the golden age of Discovery and you know it. We can only hope to touch that golden brilliance once more.

[n00bl3t]

discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=73934

Any word on this continuing trend?

Interestingly enough, gravedigging a thread is neither explicitly nor implicitly in violation of the stated forum rules, which means we would be operating inside the "common law" area of Discovery, so to speak.
We would then have to question why a prohibition against gravedigging exists inside of Internet culture.

Well, since we just had a revision of rules and all, it does bear review. (Especially since the motivation seems to be less work/more efficiency.)

Previous precedent doesn't seem to be that good an argument for a subforum in which primarily nonsense is posted amongst the new posts anyway and +1 doesn't count.

[Mephistoles]

I think it's pretty simple

Things like the above link are just being an annoying little shit

Don't be an annoying little shit

---

Sigma & GMG Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/d4j3W4v

[n00bl3t]

I think it's pretty simple

Things like the above link are just being an annoying little *****

Don't be an annoying little *****

It's Flood.

If you're annoyed and it's not against the rules, don't click on it. It's like 200% optional to the game.

[n00bl3t]

I've erected this post for some clarification. It's been some time.

Maybe Hannibal can shed some light since he seems to search through several arcane posts in the subforums no-one cares about?

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[pillow]

I've erected...

see you in a day