• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 69 70 71 72 73 … 780 Next »
Official Notice - Development Team Strike

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (37): « Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 37 Next »
Official Notice - Development Team Strike
Offline Ramke
07-02-2016, 03:11 PM,
#151
Member
Posts: 1,771
Threads: 76
Joined: Dec 2008

This.. isn't really going to make the situation any better, but make the community more disinterested in a stagnant, conflicted mod... Way too extreme?

You could've just continued developing, but held back on actually implementing the changes until the admins sort their stuff through. I mean, they already told they're discussing what to do and realize the backlash.

I can't imagine developers going "fuck this, I'm done until you revert this" for any game having a positive effect on the situation... :|

[Image: Ramkerawr.gif]
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
07-02-2016, 03:14 PM,
#152
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Saying: "Active players cannot be banned because they create activity" is also totally wrong.
Just saying "The banned need to be unbanned because the damage was too large" is a total no go.

It would just say: If you are banned, make a huge mess and walk free.


What is needed:

> Careful and professional re-evaluation to see at which point the "target definitions" went wrong.
> Correction of those punishments that were undeserved.
> Personal consequences to keep this from happening in the future

"Too much damage! Unban!" is not the way to go.
What the community wants imo is action, but not random harsh secretive action, but well-defined, well-targetted, understandable action that at least a majority of players can get behind.
Reply  
Offline Shiki
07-02-2016, 03:27 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2016, 03:28 PM by Shiki.)
#153
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(07-02-2016, 03:14 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Saying: "Active players cannot be banned because they create activity" is also totally wrong.
Just saying "The banned need to be unbanned because the damage was too large" is a total no go.

It would just say: If you are banned, make a huge mess and walk free.


What is needed:

> Careful and professional re-evaluation to see at which point the "target definitions" went wrong.
> Correction of those punishments that were undeserved.
> Personal consequences to keep this from happening in the future

"Too much damage! Unban!" is not the way to go.
What the community wants imo is action, but not random harsh secretive action, but well-defined, well-targetted, understandable action that at least a majority of players can get behind.

So ban people, because "it's a hard decision that we made" is right?
So just watching half of the served being pissed off, some other people because quit and not doing anything about it is right?
So just watching server falling under DDoS, 30-50 people online at Friday evening and again not doing anything about is right?

I understand your point, but I see priorities a little bit different it's seems.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Hawk
07-02-2016, 03:29 PM,
#154
Ass Kickin Meanie
Posts: 2,637
Threads: 522
Joined: Jul 2008

I do understand priorities. If you think anything is going to change because someone is DDoSing the server, you need to think again.
Reply  
Offline Shiki
07-02-2016, 03:30 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2016, 03:39 PM by Shiki.)
#155
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(07-02-2016, 03:29 PM)Hawk Wrote: I do understand priorities. If you think anything is going to change because someone is DDoSing the server, you need to think again.

Taking one weak point and ignoring everything else is a very nice way to make a discussion.

edit: I actually log disco yesterday and today. I make the faction to log as well. When we coming to NY(!) in a front of hattan as unlawfuls and have to wait about 15 minutes for a fight (at the evening, yeah)... You know. Concerning? Concerning.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Hawk
07-02-2016, 03:34 PM,
#156
Ass Kickin Meanie
Posts: 2,637
Threads: 522
Joined: Jul 2008

Actually, it means I'm willing to discuss the first two points. The admin team is discussing them as we speak. However, no one is willing to be bullied into changing anything because of a DDoS. That does not even deserve consideration.
Reply  
Offline Shiki
07-02-2016, 03:39 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2016, 03:41 PM by Shiki.)
#157
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(07-02-2016, 03:34 PM)Hawk Wrote: Actually, it means I'm willing to discuss the first two points. The admin team is discussing them as we speak. However, no one is willing to be bullied into changing anything because of a DDoS. That does not even deserve consideration.

I agree that DDoS is the thing that not suppose to influence the decision, I've pointed the things that harm the server at the moment. I do not taking sides and actually NOT even blaming admins, I just want server and the community and be healthy and alive. This is some desire that we share and I hope that we will do everything to make it so.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline HassLHoFF™
07-02-2016, 03:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2016, 03:43 PM by HassLHoFF™.)
#158
Member
Posts: 1,064
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2012

Shut down the ooRP, OOC sections of this forum. It's quite obvious that it does only harm the mod currently. I would be interested to see counter of ooRP posts compared to RP posts.

[Image: xwkBvsU.png]
Information and Feedback - Recruitment


[Image: q5x9eiN.png]
Information - Feedback
Reply  
Offline Hawk
07-02-2016, 03:47 PM,
#159
Ass Kickin Meanie
Posts: 2,637
Threads: 522
Joined: Jul 2008

(07-02-2016, 03:39 PM)Shiki Wrote: I agree that DDoS is the thing that not suppose to influence the decision, I've pointed the things that harm the server at the moment. I do not taking sides and actually NOT even blaming admins, I just want server and the community and be healthy and alive. This is some desire that we share and I hope that we will do everything to make it so.

Fair point. I'm all for rational discussion. I will oppose anything that leads away from rational discussion on these issues.
Reply  
Offline Hawk
07-02-2016, 03:48 PM,
#160
Ass Kickin Meanie
Posts: 2,637
Threads: 522
Joined: Jul 2008

(07-02-2016, 03:42 PM)Genexus Wrote: Shut down the ooRP, OOC sections of this forum. It's quite obvious that it does only harm the mod currently. I would be interested to see counter of ooRP posts compared to RP posts.

As easy as that would make our lives right now, I still think people deserve to have their opinions heard. I realize that some of those opinions are not constructive, but silencing them will only make this worse.
Reply  
Pages (37): « Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 37 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode