• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 45 46 47 48 49 … 391 Next »
The Blood Dragon Feedback page

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (28): « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 28 Next »
The Blood Dragon Feedback page
Offline Divine
08-04-2016, 12:51 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2016, 12:53 AM by Divine.)
#91
Probation
Posts: 1,480
Threads: 40
Joined: Jul 2008

First that's neither meta- nor powergaming.
Second, you lot don't seem to understand how the RA works, what's wrong there with the wording for it to work and the fact that there's no actual rule about it doesn't help your cause. I've pointed that out years ago when the RA was changed but some people thought they'd know better. If you now try to also here pull your "the way it was intented" then you're dead wrong in handling your own board.

But hey, whatever strikes your fancy.

//Edit: Zeph, that link is not even closely relevant.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=151485
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Wildkins
08-04-2016, 12:55 AM,
#92
Freeport 3
Posts: 1,943
Threads: 175
Joined: Feb 2013

(08-04-2016, 12:51 AM)Divine Wrote: //Edit: Zeph, that link is not even closely relevant.

That link literally shows someone getting sanctioned because they edited their communication after it was responded to.

That's, essentially, a less severe infraction of the same thing we're talking about here.

RP Feedback
Reply  
Offline Zephyranthes
08-04-2016, 12:55 AM,
#93
Paste Purveyor
Posts: 514
Threads: 89
Joined: Jan 2013

mwerte Wrote:Editing posts after people have replied to cause confusion and harm.

Would one not argue that sabotaging past roleplay would be causing confusion and harm, @Divine?
Reply  
Offline Cardinal
08-04-2016, 01:05 AM,
#94
Member
Posts: 285
Threads: 21
Joined: May 2016

Several times now, it has been stated that threads were being retconned due to old age and seemingly dead roleplay, but somehow, you can't read that. There is no such thing as a sabotage of any sort. It is the removal of cluttering on the forums. This is in no way at all to cause confusion and harm, this is to remove outdated information and roleplays that haven't been attended to for a while. But of course you jump the gun because you want to see only what you want.
Reply  
Offline Zephyranthes
08-04-2016, 01:06 AM,
#95
Paste Purveyor
Posts: 514
Threads: 89
Joined: Jan 2013

(08-04-2016, 01:05 AM)Spook Wrote: Several times now, it has been stated that threads were being retconned due to old age and seemingly dead roleplay, but somehow, you can't read that. There is no such thing as a sabotage of any sort. It is the removal of cluttering on the forums. This is in no way at all to cause confusion and harm, this is to remove outdated information and roleplays that haven't been attended to for a while. But of course you jump the gun because you want to see only what you want.

Except you cannot retcon without the consent of all parties involved, period. Smile
Reply  
Online Kauket
08-04-2016, 01:08 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2016, 01:12 AM by Kauket.)
#96
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,583
Threads: 508
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

Except it wasn't outdated. It doesn't even remove clutter. This is redonkulous. I wanted to actually try and fix roleplay relations - but apparently, APPARENTLY, the logical storypoint won't happen because of oorp grudges and hate. Most of all, you didn't have my permission or anyone elses' to remove the communications rp.

Speaking of which, did you get Snake's permission for removing the relations thread?

Reply  
Offline Shiki
08-04-2016, 01:12 AM,
#97
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(08-04-2016, 01:05 AM)Spook Wrote: remove outdated information and roleplays that haven't been attended to for a while

Some faction writeups are kinda old and not being touched for a while, according to you, they are suppose to be removed. I can't see how that works to be honest.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Cardinal
08-04-2016, 01:22 AM,
#98
Member
Posts: 285
Threads: 21
Joined: May 2016

"Except you cannot retcon without the consent of all parties involved, period. Smile "

Even though you guys completely ignored the roleplay for about a month? Which is around 4 weeks if you can't count, either. Especially that post with the talk between Auxesia and the Blood Dragons. Shizune's character was contacting you on her own part in a search for information. Therefore he had the rights to do as he saw fit, and he saw that you were ignoring the roleplay. You don't just sit on a situation like that for a month. And what do you mean, we need YOUR permission? You were the ones who left the thread behind. Snake is also gone from the Blood Dragons, pretty much. He hasn't been active in it for a while, and he is no longer in leadership, if you didn't even notice that.

Shiki, if that's what you want to believe, your choice. I'm not directly saying all old roleplays should be deleted, hell no. Things such as history, info, and RP should always be kept unless there is a reason to delete it, which was, again, consistently stated by Shizune. The comm between Aux and Shizune was his choice as he was doing it only for his character and he made the comm in the first place. At this point it seems like you are all just starting to cast lies and slander, so this conversation WILL be dropped here, before the Blood Dragons Feedback Thread becomes an "Auxesia Complains Thread".
Reply  
Offline Vendetta
08-04-2016, 01:47 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2016, 01:48 AM by Vendetta.)
#99
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,688
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2013

(08-04-2016, 01:22 AM)Spook Wrote: Even though you guys completely ignored the roleplay for about a month? Which is around 4 weeks if you can't count, either. Especially that post with the talk between Auxesia and the Blood Dragons. Shizune's character was contacting you on her own part in a search for information. Therefore he had the rights to do as he saw fit, and he saw that you were ignoring the roleplay. You don't just sit on a situation like that for a month. And what do you mean, we need YOUR permission? You were the ones who left the thread behind. Snake is also gone from the Blood Dragons, pretty much. He hasn't been active in it for a while, and he is no longer in leadership, if you didn't even notice that.

(07-13-2016, 03:12 PM)Unknown Neural Net ID Wrote:


To whom it may concern.

I wish to notify the Shogunate that Keeper Raven is no longer with us, and that her title has been passed on to myself. In light of this, a meeting can be organized in the future, but bear in mind that there remains much for us to do before any confirmed date can be provided. Expect to be notified via a more secure network of our availability.
- Keeper Endurance








(08-04-2016, 01:22 AM)Spook Wrote: Shiki, if that's what you want to believe, your choice. I'm not directly saying all old roleplays should be deleted, hell no. Things such as history, info, and RP should always be kept unless there is a reason to delete it, which was, again, consistently stated by Shizune. The comm between Aux and Shizune was his choice as he was doing it only for his character and he made the comm in the first place. At this point it seems like you are all just starting to cast lies and slander, so this conversation WILL be dropped here, before the Blood Dragons Feedback Thread becomes an "Auxesia Complains Thread".

It doesn't matter if it was only for his character, as others were specifically involved in the roleplay in that thread. Deleting it rather than waiting, or you know, contacting us to remind us about it (which he never did, and no we didn't forget) is poor play and harmful all around. It's also stupid, and I'm with Auzari on this one. After all of the months of this behavior, I've had enough, and until he learns that the community doesn't revolve solely around his choices, then I'm not bothering.

You can also check your personal bias at the door.


Also Shiki left the faction half a month ago on the day he was going to be removed from it anyway.

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Reply  
Offline Divine
08-04-2016, 01:53 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2016, 01:54 AM by Divine.)
#100
Probation
Posts: 1,480
Threads: 40
Joined: Jul 2008

You can delete all your personal characters RP all you want at any given point. That's absolutely in accordance with the RA.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=151485
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Pages (28): « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 28 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode