• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules Faction Rules Faction Review and Feedback Archived Feedback Threads
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (122): « Previous 1 … 115 116 117 118 119 … 122 Next »
Thread Closed 
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)
Offline Shaggy
01-12-2017, 10:40 PM,
#1,161
#BlameShaggy
Posts: 2,073
Threads: 157
Joined: Oct 2011

So I hear talks about being "patient" and all but it seems both of my feedback posts have been completely and totally ignored which I don't see as fair or respectful. So here is a 3rd (Third) reminder for the admin team.

Post on update for requests from last year
1st reminder

I am still being ignored and it is kinda rude considering the admin team can answer everyone else. I have asked several admins via PM or Skype and the answer I am getting is rather pathetic. It does not take more than 2 or 3 months for a request that was already "processed"

The Reputation Sheet was proceed wrong and it was re-done by @sindroms so big thank you for that, I have also been told by the Dev team it will take 2 minutes to do a (Copy and Paste) for another part of our request. The only real problem with the request was the Tech Cell. So can I please get an update on these two main requests which were partially processed.

Not only that but I am still waiting on blueprints for Core 3 on Minerva Research Center.

Then I have my personal SRP that has 250mill which has been taken off the ship already but no update on the actually request. My money has been gone for weeks now and yet no approval or denied request so again can I please get an update on this without being ignored.

Thank you
Offline St.Denis
01-12-2017, 10:52 PM,
#1,162
Member
Posts: 100,614
Threads: 1,347
Joined: Dec 2011

(01-12-2017, 10:40 PM)Shaggy Wrote: Not only that but I am still waiting on blueprints for Core 3 on Minerva Research Center.

Thank you

I sent an pm to the Crayter Republic Account:

Blueprints Crayter Republic 6 hours ago

Stating:

The Blueprints have been delivered.

Have a good evening.

'I would like to be half as clever as some people like to believe they are'
Life is full of disappointments, it is how we handle them that helps to define us, as a person
Offline Shaggy
01-12-2017, 10:56 PM,
#1,163
#BlameShaggy
Posts: 2,073
Threads: 157
Joined: Oct 2011

(01-12-2017, 10:52 PM)St.Denis Wrote:
(01-12-2017, 10:40 PM)Shaggy Wrote: Not only that but I am still waiting on blueprints for Core 3 on Minerva Research Center.

Thank you

I sent an pm to the Crayter Republic Account:

Blueprints Crayter Republic 6 hours ago

Stating:

The Blueprints have been delivered.

Have a good evening.



Yes I just checked, thank you, I also sent you a PM from that account.
Offline Vendetta
01-17-2017, 09:24 PM,
#1,164
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2013

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1857883

Please don't delete obvious roleplay posts that fit within the forum boundaries.

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Offline Emperor Tekagi
01-17-2017, 09:26 PM,
#1,165
Niemann's legacy
Posts: 2,853
Threads: 267
Joined: Jun 2015

(01-17-2017, 09:24 PM)Vendetta Wrote: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1857883

Please don't delete obvious roleplay posts that fit within the forum boundaries.

I see no reason to delete it too.
The pictures spoke for themselves and there was nothing bad about them.
It was more entertaining than harmful (it wasn't harmful at all so pls)
Offline Vendetta
01-17-2017, 09:28 PM,
#1,166
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2013

(01-17-2017, 09:26 PM)Werdackel| Wrote:
(01-17-2017, 09:24 PM)Vendetta Wrote: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1857883

Please don't delete obvious roleplay posts that fit within the forum boundaries.

I see no reason to delete it too.
The pictures spoke for themselves and there was nothing bad about them.
It was more entertaining than harmful (it wasn't harmful at all so pls)

It was also fitting the size requirements of images on the forums.

645 x 550

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Offline Kauket
01-17-2017, 09:35 PM,
#1,167
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,564
Threads: 506
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

Quote:Dear Auzari

You have received a warning from the staff of Discovery Gaming Community.
--
Keep memes out of inrp forums and more so check their size
--

First of all, it was entirely in Roleplay. The character was venting their aggrovation for being unable to do anything.

Second of all, the dimensions were /clearly/ within the forum rules. It was 645x550.

Quote:2.1 Embedded pictures can't be wider than 700px



If you think it's a meme because it's a drawn image, clearly there's something wrong with these 'rules'. I could have written this out (despite being terrible at writing) and it would have passed as roleplay

Why does it being an image change anything?
Offline Hannibal
01-17-2017, 11:36 PM,
#1,168
Still a Pyromaniac
Posts: 875
Threads: 79
Joined: Oct 2012

(01-17-2017, 09:35 PM)Auzari Wrote: First of all, it was entirely in Roleplay. The character was venting their aggrovation for being unable to do anything.
also got a nice inrp explanation about another member posting a banana in coms, yeah.. very nice one, though i don't buy it .


(01-17-2017, 09:35 PM)Auzari Wrote: Second of all, the dimensions were /clearly/ within the forum rules. It was 645x550.

its a little over the limit, 3.225 pixels ,don't try to circumvent the limit by cropping the original into smaller pieces so it "fits" within limitations
Offline Vendetta
01-17-2017, 11:47 PM,
#1,169
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2013

(01-17-2017, 11:36 PM)Hannibal Wrote:
(01-17-2017, 09:35 PM)Auzari Wrote: First of all, it was entirely in Roleplay. The character was venting their aggrovation for being unable to do anything.
also got a nice inrp explanation about another member posting a banana in coms, yeah.. very nice one, though i don't buy it .


(01-17-2017, 09:35 PM)Auzari Wrote: Second of all, the dimensions were /clearly/ within the forum rules. It was 645x550.

its a little over the limit, 3.225 pixels ,don't try to circumvent the limit by cropping the original into smaller pieces so it "fits" within limitations

Are you absolutely serious? You deleted someone's art they created for their character in their OWN story thread because you couldn't be bothered to actually look at it?

Please stop.

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Offline Operator
01-17-2017, 11:53 PM,
#1,170
Member
Posts: 1,068
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2015

(01-17-2017, 11:36 PM)Hannibal Wrote:
(01-17-2017, 09:35 PM)Auzari Wrote: First of all, it was entirely in Roleplay. The character was venting their aggrovation for being unable to do anything.
also got a nice inrp explanation about another member posting a banana in coms, yeah.. very nice one, though i don't buy it .


(01-17-2017, 09:35 PM)Auzari Wrote: Second of all, the dimensions were /clearly/ within the forum rules. It was 645x550.

its a little over the limit, 3.225 pixels ,don't try to circumvent the limit by cropping the original into smaller pieces so it "fits" within limitations

(01-17-2017, 11:36 PM)Hannibal Wrote: 3.225 pixels

The original size of a pic doesn't matters if it was pasted in [img=wxh] where w and h were not out of rules. Hell it wasn't even that big on my cellphone.

Stop doing this, okay?

Okay.
 
Pages (122): « Previous 1 … 115 116 117 118 119 … 122 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode