• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 55 Next »
Can we please change the snub changes back?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Should the snub changes be reverted again?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
72.00%
54 72.00%
No
28.00%
21 28.00%
Total 75 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (17): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 17 Next »
Can we please change the snub changes back?
Offline Vendetta
01-22-2017, 04:02 AM,
#71
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 231
Joined: Sep 2013

(01-22-2017, 04:02 AM)Haste Wrote:
(01-21-2017, 10:56 PM)Vendetta Wrote: This is what makes it a problem. I'd love to see something to make those clases more attractive than VHFs being the end-all. Maneuverability just doesn't cut it when you get down to brass tacks.

Feel free to send me your suggestions. LF and HF "overhauls" have been planned for a century and, if we're perfectly honest, those classes deserve more love than VHFs.

(:

If I come up with anything that hasn't already been suggested, I'll message you on Skype.

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Reply  
Offline Radio Freies Rheinland
01-22-2017, 05:06 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-22-2017, 05:06 AM by Radio Freies Rheinland.)
#72
Member
Posts: 190
Threads: 55
Joined: Mar 2009

(01-21-2017, 03:06 PM)Corile Wrote: Disable vertical strafing on snubs, increase gun damage, lower the nanobots on snubs. Either one will work.

This is the single dumbest suggestion ive ever seen for snubs

(reee wrong acc change to wesker)
Reply  
Offline ASimpleMan
01-22-2017, 05:14 AM,
#73
Member
Posts: 292
Threads: 10
Joined: Jun 2016

The idea of the torp and cd on ships negates the use if light and heavy fighters. Agreed on that. And the whole "disable" movement on ships is absolutely stupid. I don't think you fully grasp the ramifications of doing such.

[Image: X8GovmR.jpg]
Cuttingham's Bio : Cuttingham's Logs
Reply  
Offline sasapinjic
01-22-2017, 01:59 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-22-2017, 02:00 PM by sasapinjic.)
#74
Member
Posts: 1,693
Threads: 32
Joined: Apr 2015

(01-22-2017, 04:02 AM)Haste Wrote:
(01-21-2017, 10:56 PM)Vendetta Wrote: This is what makes it a problem. I'd love to see something to make those clases more attractive than VHFs being the end-all. Maneuverability just doesn't cut it when you get down to brass tacks.

Feel free to send me your suggestions. LF and HF "overhauls" have been planned for a century and, if we're perfectly honest, those classes deserve more love than VHFs.

(:

Want ideas , how about this one :
-LF are the only ones that can use all CD types , so they will be used more in server as what should be used , Interceptors ,
- HF , VHF and all other ships can only use most crappy CD ( something like range only 1000 , CD speed 500 , they cant stop cloak or jump system charge ) ,
-LF and HF are only class that can equipped Mines ,
That will add a little more diversity , isn't ?

[Image: rRK7Pya.png]
[+]Spoiler
welcome to Loberty [Image: qmJkeAC.png][Image: 546f6d6e95.gif]
^ where you can get Freelancer ISO , in emergency

These two spoilers were too big so now they're both one ~Champ
Reply  
Offline Sombs
01-22-2017, 02:01 PM,
#75
Three orange cats in a mech
Posts: 6,829
Threads: 503
Joined: Feb 2014

Taking away mines from the VHF will piss of major parts of the community, even me.




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions



Reply  
Offline Operator
01-22-2017, 02:04 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-22-2017, 02:04 PM by Operator.)
#76
Member
Posts: 1,068
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2015

Wait what? Mines?!

I swear to god if it ever exists, don't change anything and leave it as it is!
  Reply  
Offline Epo
01-22-2017, 02:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-22-2017, 02:28 PM by Epo.)
#77
Member
Posts: 1,706
Threads: 109
Joined: Jul 2014

Possibility to equip only LFs with Train / Reinforced CD isn't that bad tho. VHFs/HFs would be meant for regular anti-snub and bomber pewpews with their Mosquitos or shorter-range CD, while LFs would run across the battlefields stopping crucial targets.

Speaking about mines... No, removal is a bad idea. Some kind of boost in thrusting for LFs and HFs could solve the problem instead.
Reply  
Offline Backo
01-22-2017, 02:34 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-22-2017, 02:35 PM by Backo.)
#78
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

HFs should just be removed or made into light VHFs. Smile

EDIT: I mean that's what they were in vanilla. They were the lower class VHFs. Plus I really doubt they can be given some worthwhile utility to make them worth it over their big brother.

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline Foxglove
01-22-2017, 02:36 PM,
#79
Actually Sombra
Posts: 2,461
Threads: 169
Joined: Dec 2015

Well, I personally would propose giving only HFs the ability to mount tracking missiles. That would necessitate them to be added again, however.

[Image: maYSx8o.png]
Reply  
Offline Epo
01-22-2017, 02:41 PM,
#80
Member
Posts: 1,706
Threads: 109
Joined: Jul 2014

(01-22-2017, 02:36 PM)Foxglove Wrote: Well, I personally would propose giving only HFs the ability to mount tracking missiles. That would necessitate them to be added again, however.

Or that. Lower hull for ability to use tracking missiles
Reply  
Pages (17): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 17 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode