(09-19-2017, 11:44 PM)Karlotta Wrote: Now that's just... unscientific.
I prefer creative. Also, you're fun. Let's chat sometime.
I've put it in slightly more patriotic rhetoric for the 5th fleet's digestion:
Oh, say! can you see by the heavy mortar's light
What so proudly we hailed at the pirate's last gleaming;
Whose broad shields and bright flacks, through the perilous fight,
O'er the secondaries we watched were so gallantly streaming?
And the missiles' red glare, the blues bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our ganksquad was still there:
Oh, say! does that e-chat yet wave
O'er the house of no-RP and the home of the brave?
In the badlands, dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty RP in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the playerlist, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the decloaker's first beam,
In fully glory reflected now shines in the stream:
'Tis the LNS- E-chat! Oh, long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A house and a server should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul roleplay's pollution!
No refuge could save the snub and slave
From the terror of respawns or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled e-chat in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of no-RP and the home of the brave.
Oh, thus be it ever, when memey toddlers stand
Between their loved dreadnoughts and the war's desolation!
Blest with no skill and numbers, may the heav'n-rescued land
Praise the noobs that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In playerlist is our trust":
And the star-spangled mortar in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the no-RP and the home of the brave.
It seems. I'm not gonna get the 2nd dreads name. Maybe because it wasn't there at all. But whatever. Also Tanei. Whatever drug you took before you came to texas today. I would suggest you stop using it because it made you see nonexistant ships.
EDIT: SEems i'M not gonna get anykind of usefull information or grown up conversation from you. So i will tell you once.
A firm reminder not to take these kind of stances and actions against one another in a feedback thread. Reprimands will be made accordingly. That being said, this thread is locked, again.
Hello, should I expect ganks on me and @Sici to happen in every possible fight versus 5th that we start winning? The 2v2 at start was a nice gesture, but the moment we started winning you threw everything you had on us. If that's how it's going to be from now on I'd be nice for us to know so we adjust appropriately to interacting with 5th.
I have to agree that the carrier was a bit Overkill. But it only focused on one person and the only reason it went in was because of the said person joining the fight.
(10-20-2017, 09:16 PM)Morosz Wrote: I have to agree that the carrier was a bit Overkill. But it only focused on one person and the only reason it went in was because of the said person joining the fight.
That third person was our only hope to even up the fight considering we had already lost a combined load of 60 nanobots in the 2v2 that happened prior that. @Sici was at 11 and I was at 49 when at that point there were 3 5th| people more or less at full regens against us.
Had it been any other character of said person the carrier would've stayed out. The simple fact that the character of said person was a navy officer not long ago and yet said character attacked provoked the carriers response.
![[Image: loyolabully.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/loyolabully.gif)
![[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Q5rd5YU.png)