• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 547 Next »
Carriers idea

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4
Carriers idea
Offline Spectre
06-22-2018, 06:44 AM,
#31
CR
Posts: 2,314
Threads: 347
Joined: Jul 2013

(06-22-2018, 06:04 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote: But we moved away from the topic: why did Atlantis get the name "carrier" if it has the characteristics of a battleship? Can it be much easier to weaken these characteristics? Or maybe just transfer the ship to the battleships?

I've been a huge opponent of this idea ever since the whole idea of nerfing BCs. Can we, for once, have an idea that dosn't in any way, shape or form involve the nerf of any more capital-class vessels for any reason other than testing?

The lib carrier, as stated countless times before, is a testbed. The server can only handle so many plugin-added NPCs, and in every way @DarkTails is right. She's a bloody fanatic on these types of things. Probably moreso than is healthy, but I digress.

Carriers are carriers because they're carriers. A battleship (with obvious exception to those who are designed with duel purpose, ie Valor/Redemption) isn't in anyway a dedicated strikecraft platform. I'm sure by now even you are aware of the potential that bombers are capable of. Having a ship that can carry a load of these inRP into a fight against a force that, I'll remind you, is literally a flat slice of bread, makes a load of sense.

#BringBackTheCommonwealth
[Image: mHWFxPI.png]
=CR=------*L|------TFP)
[Image: UuJsIzJ.png]--.--[Image: JBFuYKi.png]---.-[Image: PdU2YZD.png]

A plurality is not a majority, and a majority is not everybody.

Spec's RP Consortium
V-3X | CV-Montu | Fort Murray
Unum pro Omnibus, Omnes pro Uno

Your signature grew too big, I helped downscale it. ~Vex
Your adjustment grew too big, I helped downscale it. ~Spectre
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode