• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 46 Next »
Official Faction Activity Second Quarter 2018

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Official Faction Activity Second Quarter 2018
Offline Banned player t202085
07-02-2018, 12:10 PM,
#61
Member
Posts: 1,112
Threads: 121
Joined: Dec 2009

(07-02-2018, 11:35 AM)Karlotta Wrote: You're trying to fight a symptom with your requests for more OF perks, and you're drawing efforts away from fighting the cause. The cause of the decline of official faction population is the decline in server population. Instead of crying "I want a Megalodon" you should think about what every OF thinking they're entitled to something like a Megalodon will do. You are free to set your own goals. Set them to something realistic and fair and you'll be less frustrated.

This particular perk should go to any faction on the activity tracker, not official factions only.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202085
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline WesternPeregrine
07-02-2018, 12:18 PM,
#62
Kusari Vanguard
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 166
Joined: Oct 2013

Faction feedback threads attract mostly bad feedback, because all good feedback is siphoned into the Kudos thread, I would say.

[+]SIGNATURE
Kusari Former Mastermind
[Image: 5tZIDB3.jpg]
========================
| The Kusari Legal Codex |
| Character Profiles | The North Star Bulletin News|
Reply  
Offline Venkman
07-02-2018, 12:21 PM,
#63
Fellow Junker
Posts: 3,496
Threads: 222
Joined: Jun 2011

Right now feedbacks are only here so butthurt monglings could cry how they either got ganked or engaged with minimal RP. It's always the same story and it's boring.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Vexykin
07-02-2018, 12:22 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2018, 12:26 PM by Vexykin.)
#64
Member
Posts: 2,069
Threads: 194
Joined: Jan 2010

Also people are drawing conclusions over a rewarding system that isn't developed yet, i mean c'mon...The idea itself could work...We already did have a small rewarding system based upon gaining official status, why not give it a little twist, carefully think this through, and balance the outcomes, it would make a nice addition to an already working system.

Smile

Tutorial Database
Liberty Rogues Official Discord:
https://discord.gg/Wt2RqVJ

Feel free to PM this account if you have any questions, I'm here to help!

Reply  
Offline A.B.
07-02-2018, 02:14 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2018, 02:19 PM by A.B..)
#65
Banned
Posts: 76
Threads: 7
Joined: Nov 2016

(07-02-2018, 12:21 PM)Venkman Wrote: Right now feedbacks are only here so butthurt monglings could cry how they either got ganked or engaged with minimal RP. It's always the same story and it's boring.

Should faction not gank underpowered players or group (that obviously have no chance of winning), it would have little to no negative feedback. If an official faction cannot cope with negative feedback due to its poor actions or inability to play fair - maybe it shouldn't be a such in the first place?

It should be official factions' responsibility to show what kind of roleplay and behaviour is expected. Ganking the weaker is not a such.

User was banned for: User request
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Vendetta
07-02-2018, 02:19 PM,
#66
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2013

(07-02-2018, 02:14 PM)A.B. Wrote: Should faction not gank underpowered players or group (that obviously have no chance of winning), it would have little to no negative feedback. If an official faction cannot cope with negative feedback due to its poor actions or unability to play fair - maybe it shouldn't be a such in the first place?

Quote:Faction review and feedback is intended to provide a forum for raising out-of-roleplay issues concerning official factions on Discovery RP 24/7.

All discussions must be conducted in a reasonable manner. If you post while annoyed, it will most likely reflect poorly on you. This applies to all parties concerned.

3) Poor in-game behaviour, characterised by repeated incidents which are harmful to server gameplay, and not merely once-off incidents or the exercise of tactical advantage, such as outnumbering, outgunning or outthinking an opponent.

Faction feedback threads are a laugh. I didn't even take them seriously before they were mandatory and petitioned to have that reverted, because it's a stupid rule. People will find any reason to complain, and giving them a dedicated location to do so publicly is probably the worst thing you could do ever. There have been so few instances of feedback being conducted in a reasonable manner that it amazes me they haven't been outright shut down just to prevent the amount of work that comes out of cleaning up posts from angry, salty people.

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Reply  
Offline A.B.
07-02-2018, 02:22 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2018, 02:26 PM by A.B..)
#67
Banned
Posts: 76
Threads: 7
Joined: Nov 2016

@Vendetta My point still stands however. Official factions should be mature enough not to show that ganking is a "normal" behaviour. They simply do not hold such a responsibility.

As I said already - simply trash official factions idea, as they have very little influence over the storyline anyway - aside of drastically lowered standards when it comes to responsibility not to do certain actions. Not that some player factions (in general) went even further and refused to go along with the storyline.

User was banned for: User request
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Chuba
07-02-2018, 02:23 PM,
#68
uwu
Posts: 1,519
Threads: 40
Joined: Sep 2013

whiny people will classify anything as a gank

[Image: Chubix.gif]
Reply  
Offline fusedcheese
07-02-2018, 02:25 PM,
#69
Member
Posts: 212
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2017

(07-02-2018, 02:23 PM)Chuba Wrote: whiny people will classify anything as a gank

gank = Rp
I have the same thing in mind
hmmmmm.....
Reply  
Offline Vendetta
07-02-2018, 02:25 PM,
#70
Technocrat Overlord
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2013

(07-02-2018, 02:22 PM)A.B. Wrote: @Vendetta My point still stands however. Official factions should be mature enough not to show that ganking is a "normal" behaviour. They simply do not hold such a responsibility.

I've had people complain that a 4v4 was a gank before. I've also had people charge at nine enemies and complain when they were shot by all of them.

Complaining about it goes nowhere.

Stop it. Get some help.

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube
------
[Image: rherh3.png]
Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode