Release - Discovery 4.91: Pyres of Remembrance

[Antonio]

Seems solid for now, although there are some unmentioned balanced changes already. Can we please get full logs or a separate thread regarding those?

---

SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC

[Kazinsal]

• The team is aware of the POB issue and is looking into it (not me though since it's 2:30am and I'm going to bed
  
• Jump holes change because they're not actually stable, Ageira was right
  
• Someone else is gonna need to comment on that Picardy thing cause I got nothin'
  
• Full patch notes Soon ™
  

---

Retired, permanently.

[SnakThree]

• The team is aware of the POB issue and is looking into it (not me though since it's 2:30am and I'm going to bed
  
• Jump holes change because they're not actually stable, Ageira was right
  
• Someone else is gonna need to comment on that Picardy thing cause I got nothin'
  
• Full patch notes Soon ™
  

Network connection is not jump holes. It's jumpgates. Hiroshima gone. Okinawa connects to Honshu once again. Is it re-retcon or RP progression.

---

[Cursetantine]

Nice

---

ALG #1

[Thyrzul]

Is there a reason why, with the new layout of Picardy, why Guise (GMS NPC Base) is situated so that to get from it to anywhere else, you need to fly pass 2 Hostile NPC Bases and a Hostile Battleship (these 3 are grouped together at a Trade Lane Junction).

Wouldn't it have been better to have left the orginal TL configuration, and just move, as you have already done, the BS and the Shipyard to Saint Quentin.

Now GMS have to run the Gauntlet of Firepower (all concentrated at one point) to travel to one of their NPC Bases.

A possible solution I could imagine to that would be to set both GMS and Council mutually neutral/nodock (-0.55) to eachother. As populist revolutionaries it isn't in the interest of Council to harm civilians, and I assume GMS don't want to actively hunt us either.

---

[St.Denis]

Is there a reason why, with the new layout of Picardy, why Guise (GMS NPC Base) is situated so that to get from it to anywhere else, you need to fly pass 2 Hostile NPC Bases and a Hostile Battleship (these 3 are grouped together at a Trade Lane Junction).

Wouldn't it have been better to have left the orginal TL configuration, and just move, as you have already done, the BS and the Shipyard to Saint Quentin.

Now GMS have to run the Gauntlet of Firepower (all concentrated at one point) to travel to one of their NPC Bases.

A possible solution I could imagine to that would be to set both GMS and Council mutually neutral/nodock (-0.55) to eachother. As populist revolutionaries it isn't in the interest of Council to harm civilians, and I assume GMS don't want to actively hunt us either.

Even with the GMS restart being neutral to Brigands and Council, Marquis NPCs instantly turn Brigands and Council Hostile.

---

'I would like to be half as clever as some people like to believe they are'
Life is full of disappointments, it is how we handle them that helps to define us, as a person

[sasapinjic]

Nice Intro , it screams :
At last , we Gauls have crush home of those Bretonia weaklings !

[ONIKS]

Roussillon current situation is so confusing and frustrating to me. Why you deleted Le Boulou and its minefield, but left the Orkney one, which is now Tau-44? Jumpholes are unstable, okay. But this just defies logical sense to me.

---

On hiatus for unspecified amount of time

[Venkman]

Interesting.

---

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)

[Chronicron]

Added new Coalition fighter models.

---