• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Real Life Discussion
« Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 245 Next »
Gallic war

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Gallic war
Offline Omi
08-21-2019, 03:14 PM,
#31
By Unpopular Demand
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2007

Honestly, I can't help but agree with Lyth. I don't see the logic in the Leeds saturation bombardment -- which, unless I'm very much mistaken, is not just a surgical strike on infrastructure.

Quote:A concentrated force of the GRN's remaining Triumph Destroyers are now operating under firing orders in comms isolation, scouring the surface of Leeds. With multiple passes from many more beams than were available at the Burning of London even the planet's mega arcologies and underground cities are at risk of horrific devastation.

I expect to see the planet totally glassed & undockable after all of this, but I am very interested to see who winds up as the scapegoat for it when all's said and done.

[Image: omicega.gif]
Reply  
Offline Sombs
08-21-2019, 03:15 PM,
#32
Three orange cats in a mech
Posts: 6,806
Threads: 502
Joined: Feb 2014

(08-21-2019, 03:00 PM)Markam Wrote:
(08-21-2019, 02:18 PM)Madvillain Wrote:
(08-21-2019, 02:11 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: The bombardement aims for infrastructure, not for the entire destruction, which is a big and significant difference

I was not aware of this and stand corrected.

This is just Sombras opinion as of posting. Lanakov was absolutely of the opinion that New London was cruise missile precision level attacks on military and strategic targets, and yet it plain ended up being 4 cities, mostly civilian targets, getting attacked and killing three hundred million people.

You will see, at the end, that Leeds wasn't targeting infrastructure, but an exercise in genocide.

I think you have a misunderstanding for what infrastructure means.




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions

Alternative Soundtracks


Reply  
Offline JonasHudson
08-21-2019, 03:27 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 400
Threads: 70
Joined: Nov 2016

(08-21-2019, 11:40 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(08-21-2019, 11:20 AM)Markam Wrote: Basically Gallia is the Phantoms reincarnated.

Which is so stupid. The war concludes with Gallia turning into a cartoon villain just because. Nomads nuking Toledo made sense because they're literally aliens who hate humanity. And to be true, Phantoms were (AFAIK) to a degree alien as well. Maybe it could all be justified as King Charles suddenly going insane.

Gotta nuke something?

(08-21-2019, 02:11 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: Despite what most people complained about, the destruction of Leeds' infrastructure makes sense and isn't cartoon-villain-ish at all. Scorched-Earth-scenarios have been a thing for a looooong time in our history, and the bombardement of Leeds actually will put one hell of a stone into the "Allied" way. The bombardement aims for infrastructure, not for the entire destruction, which is a big and significant difference. Bretonia will need a shitload of resources just to maintain what is on Leeds, and even more to rebuild. Resources they can't spend on a new war machine. It puts a time buffer in place, while also serving as a testimony of what Gallia could have done literally any time already but did not.

But these ships are rigged with beams to effect plate tectonics, and I have been under the impression that as such, Leeds will be a total loss. as in, an inhospitable lava planet. Orbital bombarment could have always been done with normal ships but to level the whole surface would take a long time. So, scortched earth is a tactic they could have used but this isnt just going after inrastructure, will anyome confirm that or do we have to wait to find out? But I see it as unrealistic its even going on for many reasons, but bottom line is its about putting us in a written space novel. I will be avoiding involvement in storyline actions and activities from now on. Setting up a war to have team based competitions is one thing, but I can't say I'm a fan of elaborate situations that happen just for the sake of throwing it in there.

[Image: pYAPPbQ.jpg]
Leeds Resistance Forces | Tales of a Renegade |The Freelancer
<<<TAU ENTERPRISES>>>
Reply  
Offline Sombs
08-21-2019, 03:31 PM,
#34
Three orange cats in a mech
Posts: 6,806
Threads: 502
Joined: Feb 2014

There are more effective ways of rendering a planet uninhabitable than laser beams. But then again, the moment I got reminded this is written by the story devs, I got reminded of how, uh, experienced they are.




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions

Alternative Soundtracks


Reply  
Offline Foxglove
08-21-2019, 03:42 PM,
#35
Actually Sombra
Posts: 2,461
Threads: 169
Joined: Dec 2015

(08-21-2019, 03:31 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: There are more effective ways of rendering a planet uninhabitable than laser beams. But then again, the moment I got reminded this is written by the story devs, I got reminded of how, uh, experienced they are.

This is literally my only complaint as well. If you wanted to prevent the planet from being productive again, you could detonate warheads around the planet's fault lines, thus cracking the surface like an eggshell, similar to how the Nomads did it with Planet Toledo. This would take less than a day. Destroying a planet in the Freelancer universe ought to be really easy, actually.

[Image: maYSx8o.png]
Reply  
Offline Thunderer
08-21-2019, 03:43 PM,
#36
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,611
Threads: 463
Joined: Jul 2011

Or drop a teaspoon of Carlisle bacteria on it.

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Reply  
Offline Karlotta
08-21-2019, 03:51 PM,
#37
Banned
Posts: 2,756
Threads: 85
Joined: Sep 2016

Funny how nobody complained when nomads destroyed an entire snowy wasteland planet because the Order had one cave and two landing pads on it. Because aliens.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=200950
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Madvillain
08-21-2019, 03:53 PM,
#38
El Presidente
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 195
Joined: Apr 2010

(08-21-2019, 03:51 PM)Karlotta Wrote: Funny how nobody complained when nomads destroyed an entire snowy wasteland planet because the Order had one cave and two landing pads on it. Because aliens.

Because aliens is actually a pretty good motivation for doing things outside the scope of human understanding

[Image: zElBwT7.png]
Baila Morena | Toilet Trouble | Elder Presidente[TBH] | The Titan Combat Manual | Confession
♰ Join the Corsair Brotherhood ♰
Reply  
Offline Thunderer
08-21-2019, 03:54 PM,
#39
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,611
Threads: 463
Joined: Jul 2011

The staff of that time was stricter. You were among the rare ones who thought of criticizing them. And then you were banned.

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Reply  
Offline LaWey
08-21-2019, 04:01 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-21-2019, 04:11 PM by LaWey.)
#40
SCEC studying YOU
Posts: 1,270
Threads: 65
Joined: Jan 2018

Chough...chough...
[Image: Air_Chief_Marshal_Sir_Arthur_Harris.jpg]
Sometime, civillians were considered as infrastructure too, isnt?
Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode