• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules Sanctions and Warnings
« Previous 1 … 44 45 46 47 48 … 449 Next »
Players Warned: Bannorn, Exe, Greylock

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Players Warned: Bannorn, Exe, Greylock
Offline Ramke
01-06-2020, 08:10 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 1,771
Threads: 76
Joined: Dec 2008

Bannorn, Exe and Greylock has been warned for:

Quote: 0.0 The intent behind these rules are for everyone to be excellent to one another, and to use common sense. Consider the people around you. Keep fair play in mind. It's a game and nothing is gained, or lost, save the experience. Credits can be re-earned. Ammunition replenished. If you become infuriated step away. If you make a mistake apologize. If you wish to find a loophole in the rules, good luck.

1.5 Meta/powergaming

Consequences: Warned

We have found your recent behaviour regarding the Tsingtao GMG incident to be completely unacceptable.

Your attitude towards fellow community members has been incredibly toxic and condescending; You've taken ooRP posts to smear the opposing faction's reputation inRP and try to get allies to join your defence. From the very beginning, you've been sending accusations and sanction threats rather than trying to communicate with them in a civil manner. You've had a clear option to roleplay it out and find a solution, yet you've opted to try and bait the opposing faction into getting sanctioned and reported them instead.

All three of you have been sending in the same reports about various people at the same time, thinking this will expedite the process. I assure you this is not the case.

I can only hope that you'll reconsider your behaviour in the future, as any further incidents will lead to more severe consequences.



Original Link for GM/Mod Use | Discovery Server & Forums Rules | Before You Post Here



If you require evidence, you may request such via PM from a Staff member. Only the accused or an official faction leader of the accused person's faction may request such. Once you have the evidence, and if you wish to dispute it, you may post in the Sanction Thread below. Do not continue PM'ing a staff member, as that will result in your Appeal being denied. If you PM a staff or post in the sanction thread and you are not directly involved, you are consenting to be subjected to the reprisal of my choice which may involve in game repercussions up to a ban. Blaming members of your immediate family, neighbors, friends, pets, and assorted Orcs, Trolls and any other legendary creatures may result in the use of GM Right #CTE 750AE
Reply  
Offline Kaiserliche Rheinwehr
01-06-2020, 08:40 PM,
#2
Best Military in the game
Posts: 414
Threads: 92
Joined: Jul 2017

On behalf of the Rheinwehr HC, we would like all of the evidence sent to this account.

[Image: bwkM6Aq.png]
Reply  
Offline Timinator
01-06-2020, 08:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-06-2020, 09:02 PM by Timinator.)
#3
Member
Posts: 173
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2015

It's not like GMG got the entire hater base to destroy not only Tsingtao but now every other Rheinland faction pob out of oorp grudge. In addition i made as 2IC sure that no one of RM dropped any sanction threat on neither the forums nor ingame. So GMG can call the coalition for help and RM isnt allowed to defend its affiliated PoBs?

Good luck on this server
Reply  
Offline Kaiserliche Rheinwehr
01-07-2020, 08:08 PM,
#4
Best Military in the game
Posts: 414
Threads: 92
Joined: Jul 2017

We would like to gently remind that we are still waiting for the evidence.

[Image: bwkM6Aq.png]
Reply  
Online Emperor Tekagi
01-07-2020, 09:20 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-07-2020, 09:29 PM by Emperor Tekagi.)
#5
Niemann's legacy
Posts: 2,927
Threads: 276
Joined: Jun 2015

In accordance to the private inquiring done by my 2ic, @Promotheus and @Ramke 's reply on the matter (giving us the ok for this here), I request kindly to receive the evidence as Kishiro| 1ic over the fact that we as faction were co-owners of Tsingtao Station, the PoB which existance derailed into an ooRP matter we preferred to stay out ourselves then.

It would be very appreciated if the evidence could find its way into my inbox, as seeing the bigger picture could help all sides involved to understand how, why and where mistakes were made from players involved into RPs we take part in such as the @Saigon Autonomous Council. In order to keep this process clean, I promise that there will be done no misconduct with the sensitive data provided and that it will only be used to analyze the situation and possibly assist our RP partners and all involved sides to avoid such grave matters, as this ooRP mess appeared to us, to repeat. The data provided will only be used within the Kishiro HC and the Saigon Chat by my side under the strict agreement of all chat members to keep it to themselves. What we do not require here is evidence resulting in a warning to leak all over the place and fuel fires I would like to extinguish.

Thank you for your reply.

With kind regards,

Werdi.
Reply  
Offline Ramke
01-07-2020, 09:46 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 1,771
Threads: 76
Joined: Dec 2008

(01-07-2020, 08:08 PM)Rheinwehr Wrote: We would like to gently remind that we are still waiting for the evidence.

Thank you for your reminder. It's been less than a day.

Evidence has been sent.

[Image: Ramkerawr.gif]
Reply  
Offline Kaiserliche Rheinwehr
01-07-2020, 09:49 PM,
#7
Best Military in the game
Posts: 414
Threads: 92
Joined: Jul 2017

To begin with we would like to see the evidence of the named offenders threatning with sanctions please. We havent found such in the provided data package

[Image: bwkM6Aq.png]
Reply  
Offline Ramke
01-07-2020, 11:59 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 1,771
Threads: 76
Joined: Dec 2008

(01-07-2020, 09:49 PM)Rheinwehr Wrote: To begin with we would like to see the evidence of the named offenders threatning with sanctions please. We havent found such in the provided data package

This sanction is primarily in regards to general behaviour witnessed from a certain group of players over an extended period, the recent event which invoked the metagaming claim is what triggered this warning. While it is true that in the most recent circumstance only one of the named players is responsible for directly threatening another player with a report, this happened over Discord and only serves as background information for the sanction. You may notice that Threatening with Sanctions is not in the list of rules broken.

Being careful to remain technically within the rules is not an excuse to treat your fellow players with hostility and threats, and sending in massive amounts of reports over everything you don't like, is not a good strategy to win over the staff.

This is only a warning, we recommend you reconsider the way you engage with your fellow community members, and if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

[Image: Ramkerawr.gif]
Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode