• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 780 Next »
JD4 and transports

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
JD4 and transports
Offline Lemon
10-01-2020, 08:42 AM,
#11
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,392
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

Ironically
My jump trading Bustard has more RP in the couple weeks it exists than most of my traders combined :]
Reply  
Offline darkwind
10-01-2020, 08:49 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-01-2020, 08:51 AM by darkwind.)
#12
Frontier Sheriff
Posts: 1,246
Threads: 144
Joined: Oct 2019
Staff roles:
Coding Developer

(10-01-2020, 08:42 AM)Relation-Ship Wrote: Ironically
My jump trading Bustard has more RP in the couple weeks it exists than most of my traders combined :]

Because we jump between systems often concentrated with players
With missing all empty systems between.
Actually I can probably tell the same for my Bustard too. it is my the only transport that even has forum roleplay at all.

In any case proposal I suggest, will not make possible for ore traders to delivery their stuff without having 'full screensaver interaction'.
Reply  
Offline Lemon
10-01-2020, 08:51 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-01-2020, 08:53 AM by Lemon.)
#13
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,392
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

Ah yeah
That's true
Like when I do sarcelles runs through Zurich I hauled billions
And had probably 3 interactions on the way
5 if you include nb. Virtually nobody pirates those transit systems so you avoid RP naturally
Reply  
Offline Binski
10-01-2020, 11:03 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 1,531
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2013

(10-01-2020, 08:21 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: Jump trading is inherently about making the maximum about of profit with the least interaction. IMO it should never be brought back in any capacity.

Limitations can keep it reasonable. A few transports per jumpship isn't crazy. A group of 5-6 transports would require 2 jumpships. To me, it was a thing you'd do in a space world that was enticing to people, got them to come and play here. Removing transports from being able to be jumped undoubtedly killed a great aspect to the mod. You really think it saved the server to have ruined jumping transports? It just ruined jumping on many people, who invested a lot in them for that purpose, which took a lot of regular trading. The solution was to sort it out, not axe it for those who only ever see worst case scenarios.

With the suggested changes, there would still be plenty of opportunity for interactions regardless of using jd's to jump small groups. Jump trading was a 2nd tier to trading/supplying, and made a lot of sense that it be something to be earned.

(10-01-2020, 08:49 AM)darkwind Wrote:
(10-01-2020, 08:42 AM)Relation-Ship Wrote: Ironically
My jump trading Bustard has more RP in the couple weeks it exists than most of my traders combined :]

Because we jump between systems often concentrated with players
With missing all empty systems between.
Actually I can probably tell the same for my Bustard too. it is my the only transport that even has forum roleplay at all.

In any case proposal I suggest, will not make possible for ore traders to delivery their stuff without having 'full screensaver interaction'.

Sure but like how much can you haul? 1200 units of cargo at most? with a cost of 4.5 mil per jump? Is it cheaper if you use a JD3? Jump trading with a bustard for small amounts is possible but not very practical.

I envison using Bustards to offer jumps to small groups of ships seeking ore. You could jump them to the ore field to meet a miner, or bring one. They still sit there to fill up. Once done, they jump out. How long does it take to fill 3 transports, then charge a few mins for a jump? Mining is mining, and it only takes a CD to interrupt a jump. Seems like plenty of time to go pirate a group while mining.

And on the other end, the group arrives at the destination, and is there for several minutes. But in theory, if notices go out of the jumps and their locations, eventually ships may be in or near that system waiting. They say it avoids certain territory, but you can't avoid your origin and destination. For the cost you should be able to earn that small jump convoy ability. There are plenty of reasons to bring people all over the server for various commodities, giving plenty of chances for interaction.
Reply  
Offline RedEclipse
10-01-2020, 11:19 AM,
#15
Phoenix Godfather
Posts: 1,623
Threads: 178
Joined: Nov 2008

(10-01-2020, 08:21 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: Jump trading is inherently about making the maximum about of profit with the least interaction. IMO it should never be brought back in any capacity.
Amen.
  Reply  
Offline Groshyr
10-01-2020, 12:28 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 3,885
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2018

Maybe make special liners, capable to mount and use JD? Perhaps make them fragile, slow, huge, defenseless. This is what I'd like to have in the case of jumptrading and jumpsupplying.
Reply  
Offline Matthews
10-01-2020, 12:42 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 324
Threads: 13
Joined: Sep 2010

(10-01-2020, 12:28 PM)Groshyr Wrote: Maybe make special liners, capable to mount and use JD? Perhaps make them fragile, slow, huge, defenseless. This is what I'd like to have in the case of jumptrading and jumpsupplying.
Sooo... a barge? xD

[Image: IG7h5oH.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Groshyr
10-01-2020, 12:44 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 3,885
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2018

Barge is a mistake of development and design, that should be removed for good and never ever to be used again :rage:
Reply  
Offline Matthews
10-01-2020, 12:52 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 324
Threads: 13
Joined: Sep 2010

Ye that was irony Big Grin. But you gotta admit, your description fits.

[Image: IG7h5oH.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Groshyr
10-01-2020, 12:58 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 3,885
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2018

Unfortunately you are indeed right. Barge's concept is a good one but the way it was made...
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode