• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Community Feedback
1 2 3 4 Next »
Staff Feedback Thread

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 0 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 0 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (105): « Previous 1 … 76 77 78 79 80 … 105 Next »
Staff Feedback Thread
Offline Megaera
11-23-2023, 05:20 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-23-2023, 05:20 AM by Megaera.)
#771
Most Wanted
Posts: 2,764
Threads: 270
Joined: Dec 2017

(11-23-2023, 05:01 AM)Wildkins Wrote: Okay I guess we're doing this here then

(11-23-2023, 04:29 AM)Kauket Wrote:
(11-23-2023, 04:01 AM)Megaera Wrote: Essentially the choice right now boils down to: Torch your Core 5 POB in order to keep your NPC station.

Did you not submit a canonisation request of said station before? Asking out of curiosity.

The request was never made overtly, but feelers were put out to the previous dev team as far as I can tell, and the opinion at the time was a resounding no. At least, that is what I can gather from the extant request threads and the developer discord - what overtures were made in working groups or DMs, I can't say. The custom model request was made, and approved by the staff team, and when it was passed on to implementation by the dev team, they basically decided to go ahead and make an NPC base essentially purely to make it easier to implement the model, because the alternative would be to actually, y'know, model the base.

Kinkaku-ji was never meant to be canonized, as far as I am aware. The fact that it ended up as an NPC base happened pretty much exclusively because the developers at the time were unable or unwilling to implement the change the way it should have been done (purely as a custom model). The current system of custom models (where the POB is simply one piece and several system objects are tacked onto it and parented, see: Isle of Skye, Nichols, etc.) is understandably untenable, because it means every systems change then has to involve admin work of moving the POBs in place, and it also likely causes issues with sieging those bases because the damage may not propagate properly. The only "proper" way to do this system would be to actually create a custom model (rather than stapling pieces together in the system INI), but that requires modeling work that is ever in short supply.

I made the suggestion of keeping the custom model on the POB - because that is what was requested - and recycling the NPC base into a drydock extension or something of the like, something that would be much lower impact but still maintain some of the story beats from KKJ that are acceptable by the story team, and maintain the same gameplay effects of having another ship sale point.

So it was a miscommunication and a screw up on all sides then. The general consensus at GC is that we prefer to keep the NPC station and canonise that completely. The whole thing is arguably as frustrating for the staff as it is for us.

It is a mess in general.

In any case, we want the Kinkaku-ji NPC base to persist, because the afformentioned reasons. You would have to replace the missing docking bay on the model though, but I am sure that won't be too much work. If we have to sacrifice the pob for that, then that would be the lesser evil. Not something I like, but if I have to swallow that to keep the NPC base standing, so be it.

It still feels like a problem the staff has created and I am now retroactively punished for. It was never an issue until now.


Matriarch Of the Gen'an Chrysanthemums - Ishikawa Aya
Gen'an Cell Information - Recruitment - Communications Network

Megaera - Ishikawa Masako
Feedback - Data Storage - Birth of a goddess

Reply  
Offline Megaera
11-23-2023, 05:29 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-23-2023, 05:31 AM by Megaera.)
#772
Most Wanted
Posts: 2,764
Threads: 270
Joined: Dec 2017

To add to the above:

KKJ was questioned as canon before, when I first attempted to get our cruisers, and I had to dispell it back then too:



Matriarch Of the Gen'an Chrysanthemums - Ishikawa Aya
Gen'an Cell Information - Recruitment - Communications Network

Megaera - Ishikawa Masako
Feedback - Data Storage - Birth of a goddess

Reply  
Offline The_Godslayer
11-23-2023, 06:12 AM,
#773
Troll Mastermind
Posts: 804
Threads: 95
Joined: Mar 2019

(11-23-2023, 04:18 AM)Megaera Wrote: Blood dragons, Outcasts, GC, the occasional lane hacker, other freelancers who occasionally pass by.

It is true that the economy changes devaluated it, but it still is a prime staging area for raids, with good missions. Out of all GC bases, it is the most used by far. Preferably I would like to see its smuggling routes return as well of course, but the economy as a whole needs work.

My question was unclear. In terms of story/logistics, what purpose does it serve that Noshima for unlaw-quasilaw and Golden Dragon for law-quasilaw don't serve? Noshima is the smuggling/unlawful staging point, and Golden Dragon is the smuggling/lawful staging point. KKJ was the production point for the cardamine tea, and it was a Chrysanthemum base, but in other points it's just a Noshima that isn't nice for quasi-lawfuls to James Bond at because everyone who's going to be there is absolutely going to be unlawful.

I'm all for canonization of the base if it can serve a good purpose in the system. The tea needs to come back tbh.

I'll do something about my superiority complex when I cease to be superior.

"Whatever happened to catchin' a good old-fashioned passionate ass-whoopin and gettin' your shoes, coat, and your hat tooken?"

Reply  
Offline Jayenbee
11-23-2023, 11:36 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-23-2023, 11:43 AM by Jayenbee.)
#774
Maker of Ways
Posts: 402
Threads: 19
Joined: Aug 2011

(11-22-2023, 10:43 PM)Cpt. Dylan Hunt Wrote: Dylan Hunt isn't a widely recognized character, as only one person in the community seems to know its origin (shoutout to you, bro <3).

You wound me.
Any self-respecting Sci-Fi nerd has at least heard of these; Babylon 5, Andromeda, Farscape, V, Star Trek, Stargate, Star Wars.

Your continued existence was thanks to the graces of people like me who didn't care to stamp on your parade, despite it being obviously rule breaking. The fact you knowingly continued to break the rule was done so at your own peril.

Edit: Kudos to the Staff for finally having a spine to enforce this rule. It's been brought up in the past, but people have never wanted to touch it, for fear of reprisal or something.

When contending with a monster, you'd be wise to give the devil his due.
Reply  
Offline Chronicron
12-23-2023, 05:54 AM,
#775
Assuming direct control
Posts: 1,450
Threads: 131
Joined: Aug 2017

It's been well over a month since I submitted my dev application and I haven't heard a word since. If you won't process people's applications, then at least have the decency to tell them "no".

[Image: uXIwfFB.png]
  Reply  
Offline The_Godslayer
12-23-2023, 06:39 AM,
#776
Troll Mastermind
Posts: 804
Threads: 95
Joined: Mar 2019

(12-23-2023, 05:54 AM)Chronicron Wrote: then at least have the decency to tell them "no".

Please. I know the answer is no every time, but actually getting a no at least lets me stop paying attention to DMs and random forum posts.

I'll do something about my superiority complex when I cease to be superior.

"Whatever happened to catchin' a good old-fashioned passionate ass-whoopin and gettin' your shoes, coat, and your hat tooken?"

Reply  
Offline Major.
12-23-2023, 05:45 PM,
#777
Imperial Veteran
Posts: 903
Threads: 65
Joined: Jun 2015

(12-23-2023, 05:54 AM)Chronicron Wrote: It's been well over a month since I submitted my dev application and I haven't heard a word since. If you won't process people's applications, then at least have the decency to tell them "no".

Give this man a answer.

[Image: R5zSdBa.png]
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
01-08-2024, 07:25 AM,
#778
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

Staff, do you think that new government oversight was beneficial now that some time have passed?

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline SnakThree
01-17-2024, 04:21 PM,
#779
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

Very inactive staff, can't respond to feedback. Should probably lose official status.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline NOVA-5
01-17-2024, 05:20 PM,
#780
Smegger
Posts: 1,389
Threads: 63
Joined: Jan 2009

Spec savers would be a start.
Reply  
Pages (105): « Previous 1 … 76 77 78 79 80 … 105 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode