• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
1 2 3 4 5 … 46 Next »
Announcement: Interspace Commerce ID

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (10): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 10 Next »
Announcement: Interspace Commerce ID
Offline Sally
07-12-2025, 01:59 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-12-2025, 02:02 PM by Sally.)
#21
Member
Posts: 380
Threads: 62
Joined: May 2022

Cool and based change, I approve.

(07-12-2025, 10:22 AM)LuckyOne Wrote: So, doesn't this make IC the better ID for credit piracy than the actual pirate ID?

Yes, and it should since bankers are among the biggest thieves in civilized society, only surpassed by governments.

(07-12-2025, 10:22 AM)LuckyOne Wrote: Maybe the Pirate ID should then get buffed by allowing piracy of combat ships in House Space.


Generic pirates are extremely poor and they sortie to bring some booty back (or at least that's the way they're being portrayed in Disco), not to demand snubs to leave the system which is realistically the sort of thing you'd demand to a combat target. The ID already allows to shoot lawful targets through bounty claims which makes sense since they would do mercenary job for money.

(07-12-2025, 01:25 PM)Nodoka Hanamura Wrote: How about allowing the ability to engage law enforcement/military in House Space?

You already can do that with the current ID writeup allowing to claim bounties against lawfuls. Pirate ID used to be an awful, extremely limited ID and them getting bounty hunter lines, combined with the fact that now everyone can post blanket bounties without officials being involved means it can be a very powerful terrorist ID, if you care to do some forumlancing about it.

"I suppose many people will continue moving towards careless computing, because there's a sucker born every minute." - RMS
Reply  
Offline Xenon
07-12-2025, 02:47 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 2,349
Threads: 190
Joined: Feb 2016

(07-12-2025, 10:00 AM)Karst Wrote: Cannot use ships with more than 3,600 cargo space.

[Image: mr-bean-shocked.gif]

[Image: 2aD52st.png]
NEBULA INFORMATION BOT ☆ NEBULA DISCORD SERVER
XENON WEAPONS MARKET ☆ NEBULA GRAND PLAZA ☆ NEBULA TECHNOLOGIES

THE DISCOVERY POBCAST ☆ DISCOVERY SERVER RULES

Reply  
Offline Lusitano
07-12-2025, 03:15 PM,
#23
Storm Chaser
Posts: 1,806
Threads: 192
Joined: Feb 2011

so ... 3.6K cargo ship ... many 5k will be gone or fly with another id. but honestly ... without the one that is made in pob, i don't see any 3.6k ship, that a corporate liberty "can have", and i don't think that many IC indie players, are willing to pay so much for a small ship like that. what about a lawfull liberty 3.6k ship, like gallia has, the Aubrac?
Reply  
Offline jammi
07-12-2025, 03:22 PM,
#24
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,544
Threads: 360
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

(07-12-2025, 01:25 PM)Nodoka Hanamura Wrote:
(07-12-2025, 10:22 AM)LuckyOne Wrote: So, doesn't this make IC the better ID for credit piracy than the actual pirate ID?

Maybe the Pirate ID should then get buffed by allowing piracy of combat ships in House Space.

How about allowing the ability to engage law enforcement/military in House Space?

Pirate ID is limited precisely because we don't want that. If they want to attack the authorities, pirates need a genuine motivation, i.e. unlawful bounty hunting, not just because they feel like it.

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline Amba
07-12-2025, 03:34 PM,
#25
Member
Posts: 255
Threads: 68
Joined: Dec 2023

Being able to straight up attack competitors (i.e. Samura/IDF) in ZOI outside of house space feels like its a bit much but other than that seems like a good change. Liberty already has plenty of bloat with corpo IDs that are functionally identical and Interspace never should've been a stereotypical shipping ID to begin with imo
Reply  
Offline Karst
07-12-2025, 04:00 PM,
#26
Chariot of Light
Posts: 2,984
Threads: 214
Joined: Sep 2009

(07-12-2025, 03:34 PM)Amba Wrote: Being able to straight up attack competitors (i.e. Samura/IDF) in ZOI outside of house space feels like its a bit much but other than that seems like a good change.

That wasn't changed. They already had that line, and so do (almost) all other Corporate IDs.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  
Offline Petitioner
07-12-2025, 04:17 PM,
#27
a e s t h e t i c
Posts: 3,354
Threads: 292
Joined: Dec 2009
Staff roles:
Server Administrator

(07-12-2025, 11:03 AM)R.P.Curator Wrote: For me Ship is Ship, ID is ID.
I've been shot at for flying the wrong ship with the right ID.
If thats the staff position - ship = ID; then this changes things.
Thank you for the clarification on this.

Ship does not equal ID. If the two were the same thing then there wouldn't be two different words.

In the rules and in ID lines, "ship" is more like "player character". For example, "can engage any ship carrying Nomad materials" = "If you target someone flying around and scan them and they have Nomad materials, then you can engage them". This has very little to do with what vessel the player's flying.

[Image: gamer5000.gif]

Recruitment | Task Force Prometheus | ICN FIRESTORM
  Reply  
Online Synts
07-12-2025, 06:01 PM,
#28
Member
Posts: 114
Threads: 5
Joined: Dec 2011

IC, one of Liberty's "Big Three" , so that means rest Liberty's Two should get cargo nerf too soon ?

I am not a native English Speaker, so i make grammar errors.
But it annoys me when people make silly comments about that... especially brits who for the most part can't speak their own language let alone anyone elses!
  Reply  
Offline Sam101
07-12-2025, 06:17 PM,
#29
Member
Posts: 70
Threads: 15
Joined: Oct 2013

everyone always seem so confused when Dev's change things.........perfect way to look at this is.....change Dev with "pirate" and then change the word "fun" with "control and restrictions", then you no longer will have anything to complain about.
Reply  
Offline Sand-Viper
07-12-2025, 06:24 PM,
#30
Member
Posts: 1,937
Threads: 102
Joined: Nov 2007

Oh.

Can engage in piracy against non-Gallic Corps.. Within ANY system containing a Sirius trade lane.

Including... within House Space!?

That is a HEKK of a buff, woof!

That feels a little powerful, but let's see how this goes! Can always adjust it back to "Outside House Space" if needed, later.

Meanwhile, I feel as though the cargo limit should have an exception:
The Shukensha Renzu Liner?

After all, Renzu is very much a subsidiary of Interspace!


R.I.P. My Interspace Kujira. Ah well - Time for the Red.Tape.Rambler to become a Grouse or Bottlenose maybe to sell some "Limted Extended Ship Warranties" to other corp transports, hyeh heh heh~

The Gaelic Wyvern Inn
If you've interacted with us recently, please consider checking out our in-character Public Guest Reviews thread!
Reply  
Pages (10): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 10 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode