• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 443 444 445 446 447 … 547 Next »
Destroyer

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Destroyer
Offline Linkus
09-14-2008, 03:33 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-14-2008, 03:34 AM by Linkus.)
#1
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

I took one of my earlier vessels and redid it to make this. It draws on a few different sources but is in itself unique.

[Image: destroyerdg6.jpg]
[Image: destroyer2xb6.jpg][Image: destroyer3zh0.jpg][Image: destroyer4bg9.jpg]

Now I am having issues with the front of the ship. I'm unsure whether or not to keep the parts that jut out horizontally from it. Without them, it looks like this:

[Image: destroyerrzh7.jpg][Image: destroyerr2mu5.jpg]


Once again, thoughts/suggestions etc etc are always welcome!:)





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline Turkish
09-14-2008, 03:42 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2007

I think it looks brilliant the way it is!

[Image: LibreIISuper_Small.png]

I have a fetish for all things Norse.
  Reply  
Offline Xing
09-14-2008, 03:44 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 5,274
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2007

quite interesting. But, which affiliation?

[Image: audrey03a.png]
  Reply  
Offline Linkus
09-14-2008, 03:51 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

I was thinking of a private development. The idea behind it being that there are many civilians out there with wealth but little help to back it up. Most could bring 20 fighters to a fight say but with nowhere to command from, things get a bit risky etc.

It's long slim profile suits asteroid fields etc quite well so it could be Zoner affiliated. Designed to better converse the fields than the lumbering Battlestars etc.






Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline mwerte
09-14-2008, 04:17 AM,
#5
Old Man
Posts: 4,049
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2007

looks like a ****** to manuver through TLs though.


  Reply  
Offline ferongr
09-14-2008, 06:49 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 139
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2008

A light destroyer?

Mhm... It kinda looks inline with Jinx's Order and Zoner capships... Perhaps the new independent cruiser... 165K of armor, 8 turrets, and agility similar to the Kusari one?

[Image: sigsg8.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Generation
09-14-2008, 08:55 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 443
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2008

It looks sweet.


I reckon it should have insanly powerful shields and a realy strong hull.

But it only has say 4 guns and they do bugger all damage.

basically make it a real civi ship.


Ok sorry, any way its a real nice ship.

[Image: .gif][Image: .gif]

[Image: lwb_crawford.jpg]


[Image: userbar654969ky7.gif]
[Image: s3f3hs.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
09-14-2008, 09:19 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:It looks sweet.
I reckon it should have insanly powerful shields and a realy strong hull.

But it only has say 4 guns and they do bugger all damage.

basically make it a real civi ship.
Ok sorry, any way its a real nice ship.

I'd support stronger armour and less weapons for it, if it is civilian.

(Shields are same for all Cruisers yes?)

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline Generation
09-14-2008, 09:22 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 443
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2008

It needs to be dammed hard to kill, but allmost no guns.

The only Cruised I'd ever buy.

[Image: .gif][Image: .gif]

[Image: lwb_crawford.jpg]


[Image: userbar654969ky7.gif]
[Image: s3f3hs.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline ferongr
09-14-2008, 10:31 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-14-2008, 10:33 AM by ferongr.)
#10
Member
Posts: 139
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2008

' Wrote:It looks sweet.
I reckon it should have insanly powerful shields and a realy strong hull.

But it only has say 4 guns and they do bugger all damage.

basically make it a real civi ship.
Ok sorry, any way its a real nice ship.


' Wrote:I'd support stronger armour and less weapons for it, if it is civilian.

(Shields are same for all Cruisers yes?)

Why should a civilian ship have strong defences? It's supposed to have lower quality and technology than a military vessel. I'd say, give it 7-8 guns, low armor, but make it compact and fast, reflecting the low mass and volume by it's reduced armor.

Edit: Not to mention, the model looks light and fragile, not a super-armored beast.

[Image: sigsg8.gif]
  Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode