• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Stories and Biographies
« Previous 1 … 659 660 661 662 663 677 Next »
Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 0 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 0 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 0 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread.
Offline Koolmo
11-26-2006, 02:13 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 1,662
Threads: 65
Joined: Sep 2006

Well, I'm actually here as the 'voice of military matters' for the parties, and you got it wrong Mal, its Aeon who's retired.

So, here goes: I think that this war should be fought over 4-6 neutral/contested systems and 2 "base systems". For the SCRA, the base system should be either O-49, or O-50. O-50 is empty, so it would make the RP a little hard. For the Helghast, i really don't know enough about your area, perhaps a system with a junker base in it would be appropriate. The 4-6 "contested" systems should be in the immediate area of those 2 systems, preferably offering multiple routes to get to each. The omegas would offer the perfect battleground in my opinion, they would restrict the use of capships, but still allow for a good fight, with loads of NPC's around. There should be a limit on the number of allies avalable, 2v2 sounds good to me. I assume the SCRA will be re-hiring the SSO|, as they were the only ones that were fully into the fight with us, and it would save the ELF and the SF the trouble of fighting a war that isn't theirs.

So, there should be several guidleines for the War:

1) Dead is dead. If you get blown up, you are out of the fight for good, no best out of 3 avalable. his adds an RP element to the combat, and makes it more likely for players to use reasonable tactics. IF the combat starts up again within 10 minutes, you are still dead, beyond that, feel free to regenerate.

2) Combat in DESIGNATED SYSTEMS ONLY. Also, traders WILL NOT be attacked, otherwise the war will get bogged down due to lack of funds.

3) Capital ships can not be used in groups larger then 2. this saves everyone sitting at home blazing away in their BS at each other, and adds some realism to the fight. Most navies in Sci-Fi have alot more fighters than cruisers.

4) If there are 3 SCRA on, and 1 Helghast, Only 2 of the SCRA may fight. This way, it saves us the problem of overwhelming forces crushing the opposition. Let us say that each side may only have numbers +1 than the force opposing them. So, 3 vs. 4 is acceptable, but 3 vs. 6 is not.

I might upgrade this list if i think of something else, but that all I have for now. I believe that this war can be turned into a recruitment tool for al factions involved, but still retain an element of real combat.

Koolmo

<span style="color:#FFFF00">&quot;General Solo, is your strike team assembled?&quot;
&quot;Barely, they're pretty drunk.&quot;
</span>
SCRA Recruiting--SCRA Feedback--SCRA Message Dump--SCRA Faction Status
Jack Handey Wrote:I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.
  Reply  
Offline Ant
11-26-2006, 02:22 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-26-2006, 04:21 AM by Ant.)
#12
Member
Posts: 413
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2006

Koolmo has obviously given this more thought than me. Please take my motion off the table unless it can be incorporated into Koolmo's ideas.

Apologies for speaking out of turn. :)
[Image: scra_ad_003.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Malaclypse 666
11-26-2006, 02:26 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 3,634
Threads: 87
Joined: Sep 2006

Ant,Nov 25 2006, 06:22 PM Wrote:Koolmo has obviously given this more thought than me.&nbsp; Please take my motion off the table unless it can be incorporated into Koolmo's ideas.

Apologies for speaking out of turn. :)
[snapback]45972[/snapback]

@Ant. Was about to suggest withdrawal. Thanks.

@Koolmo: I am a blithering, bibbling idiot, Mcintosh. I should let Dis do the talking as well as the recording.

Agenda updated. Guidelines presented by Mcintosh added. Discussion open.
  Reply  
Offline Qunitinius~Verginix
11-26-2006, 03:14 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 2,777
Threads: 61
Joined: Aug 2006

I second that. But the Helghast would choose an area more valuable to us then Sigma 17

[Image: qvsigaz9.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Aeon
11-26-2006, 04:40 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 237
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006

well, besides Bretonia, where does the Helghast operate the most?

the omegas sounds like a good battlefield to me.

ill list the main omega systems here:

omega-5, omega-41, omega-47, omega-49, omega3, and omega 7.

if there are any ive missed, please post a correction.

the 2v2 is the most factions i want involved. so for instance, i dont want the AW in this. Dab pm'ed me to post in here. so let him say what he wants to say.

but even though they are the HF's allies, the AW will NOT be participating in this.

the "if you die your dead" rule sounds good to me, let it be in effect from this point in time on.

ideally, i would like this to be a gentleman's war, so no unnecesarry insults and provocations.

im glad we can do this cordially and amicably and maturely.
  Reply  
Offline TankTarget
11-26-2006, 04:43 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-26-2006, 04:43 AM by TankTarget.)
#16
Member
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 34
Joined: Jun 2006

Well for one I thought the war had ended if I was wrong then correct me. Personally I think we should set up a series of battles fight them then call it over unless QV wants me to earn my pay then we can have whatever but personally I want this war to be over collect my payment and put it all behind me and get back to having fun (psst maybe we can unite again and delcare war on some big faction????) This is a war born out of an arguement why don't we all just kill someone else to get the anger out?
  Reply  
Offline Aeon
11-26-2006, 04:49 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 237
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006

It appears that the HF dont want to participate in this war. ill await further clarification.

i think that there are no longer any hard feelings between the parties, so im rather confused.
  Reply  
Offline TankTarget
11-26-2006, 04:58 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 34
Joined: Jun 2006

I can't understand why the war is going on as far as I am concerned we won the war not militarily but politically I don't want a rehash hey here's a surprise why not negotiate Helghast pay me I or will smite thee and can we all be allies and better allies to each other than before and just go to war with some lawful faction for kicks and giggles?
  Reply  
Offline Lt.Cmdr.Olsav
11-26-2006, 05:04 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 601
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2006

Whatever everyone else wants im fine with.

RAHF.Lt.Karol.Olsav
fmr Lord Solar Admiral of the Helghast, fmr.RAHF-Olsav-[Cpt], fmr. {Helghast}(LSA-vhf)~Olsav, fmr.{Helghast}(LSA)~Olsav, aboard HCS. Kesselring
[Image: oslav0001copiesj1.png]
  Reply  
Offline Qunitinius~Verginix
11-26-2006, 05:04 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,777
Threads: 61
Joined: Aug 2006

There was really only one abttle and the helghast had no part in it. I think the war should be fought in the omega systems for one. And that battle definetly did not qualiy for 500 mil worth. Let us have so good battles and then finnish this. We need to set boundaries and such first though.

And what do you mean; 'when you die your dead' Aeon

[Image: qvsigaz9.gif]
  Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode