• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 410 411 412 413 414 … 547 Next »
Capital Ship Point Defense

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (32): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 32 Next »
Capital Ship Point Defense
Offline Grumblesaur
03-15-2009, 02:53 AM,
#11
Fleet Tender
Posts: 2,742
Threads: 56
Joined: Sep 2008

' Wrote:Kurosora:

It's not just the juggernauts that are affected, it's ships like RM BS, Spyglass, OC Dread...
That was merely an example, no need to ask for a "lock"...

People should know what they're getting into when they buy those ships. They're -Heavy- battleships for a reason.

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
Reply  
Offline zeinstruktor
03-15-2009, 02:55 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 277
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2008

Well yea I agree. If I were to buy an RM BS, I'd have a full cap-raping setup and rely on fighters to do my bidding...
  Reply  
Offline Cosmos
03-15-2009, 02:56 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,208
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2008

i can has Harvester Cruiser?

Yus! Harvester Cruiser it is, therefore.... RAZOR SPAM...

[Image: .png]
[22:50:33] ☆ҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳEternal†Nightmareҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳ☆(illi): i cyber with leather torps (smoking)
  Reply  
Offline Tenacity
03-15-2009, 02:57 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-15-2009, 05:20 AM by mwerte.)
#14
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:Well yea I agree. If I were to buy an RM BS, I'd have a full cap-raping setup and rely on fighters to do my bidding...

If only everyone on the server who flew a capship had an army of fighter minions to follow them around 24/7...

Does everyone don a clock blindfold when discussing capship balancing issues?

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Blackvertigo1
03-15-2009, 03:03 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 681
Threads: 40
Joined: Jun 2008

[rant] ...I hate these modified missile turrets, the only cool part about em is the effects and the instant-rape of NPC fighters (thats if your shooting at them strait-on, other than that your draining energy). Flaks, hear they suck, thats a -have-been- and solaris turrets... yeah. [/rant]

"The path to hell is paved with good intentions."


Quote:* Nodoka Hanamura is all about that SSH life
If you can't RP then 1.0

"There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy - from our odyssey into Hell, we have returned with a gift."
Reply  
Niezck
03-15-2009, 03:30 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-15-2009, 05:21 AM by mwerte.)
#16
Unregistered
 

Not adding to the constructive debate going on. *poof*
Reply  
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
03-15-2009, 03:30 AM,
#17
Unregistered
 

Ugh, the missle turrets suck, hey if we got the old ones back, i would be happy, and the LPI would have donuts and the RM would have vodka and life would be good.
And, Niezekc, Try to fly a battleship with a load of nomad NPC's that you can do nothing about besides a couple fail turrets. really, go try it, you need to.

btw,

WAHH I WANT MY BOMBER TO BE ABLE TO SN LF's WAHHHH
Reply  
Offline stewcool
03-15-2009, 03:34 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 1,969
Threads: 275
Joined: Nov 2007

My little rant about large ships

My destroyer needs escort destroyers to take on 4 BHG destroyers.

2 alone can barely take em on and even when theres 4 v 4 they still almost kill someone.

[Image: kelsieicsig.png]
Reply  
Niezck
03-15-2009, 03:35 AM,
#19
Unregistered
 

Quote:My destroyer needs escort destroyers to take on 4 BHG destroyers.

I lulz'd.
Then I serious'd.

Say that sentence back to yourself.
Infact, I'll add in some key words that make it clearer.

"My ONE Destroyer needs escort destroyers to take on FOUR BHG Destroyers."

What part of that seems unbalanced?
Reply  
Offline Grumblesaur
03-15-2009, 03:37 AM,
#20
Fleet Tender
Posts: 2,742
Threads: 56
Joined: Sep 2008

' Wrote:Waaaah. I want my winship to be able to beat anything! Waaaah. I want to be able to destroy anything without dying! Waaaah. Why won't you let me proclaim myself the uber lord of all and go around sirius, blowing everything sky-high for the lulz? Waaaah.

/signed

Heavy Battleships aren't meant to be shooting fleas. It's like using a shotgun to kill a fly - not going to work well.

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
Reply  
Pages (32): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 32 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode