• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 380 381 382 383 384 … 547 Next »
Developments of the Bretonian Region

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 12 Next »
Developments of the Bretonian Region
Offline Seth Karlo
04-08-2009, 12:07 PM,
#61
Member
Posts: 2,985
Threads: 141
Joined: Apr 2008

*Sighs*

Ok, when you're done arguing, come and tell me what you want and I'll make it so.

[Image: SethSig.png]
Signature by Sleipnir.
  Reply  
Offline jammi
04-08-2009, 12:35 PM,
#62
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,561
Threads: 361
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

Could you start with Katlyn's Swansea system, because no-one seems to be contesting that. After that's done, I suppose Edinburgh could be started. The time it takes to mod Swansea might mean that this lot will have resolved itself too. Hopefully.

Oh, and Seth... Bretonia Loves yoooou!:ylove:

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline pbrione
04-08-2009, 02:35 PM,
#63
Member
Posts: 502
Threads: 41
Joined: Jun 2008

Alright, well if we don't touch any unlawful bases, apart from Edinburgh there don't seem to be any objections to the rest of the plan, so here it is again:


Changes we're proposing/requesting are:

In Cambridge:
The Line in Cambridge should be extended/Beefed up. If you don't know what it its, the Line is all the weapons platforms beside the tradelane from Planet Camb to Battleship Norfolk. It is a vanilla object, and in rp, ineffective(against vanilla ships, in Bretonia, this means it targets mkI HF, and it sees VHF every day). I'd like to see it at least noticeable...denser Weapons Platforms would be great.

In New London:
The Molly Destroyer moved again, because, well, it should keep moving around.
Kensington...Could use a bit more substance than just a chain of docking ports...more towers, or..something. Its just shabby.

In Leeds:
An ALG base of some sort, for cleaning up the mess. They're getting a zone for mining toxic waste there, and they're a vanilla ally of Gateway.

Edinburgh:
The Edinburgh Project. See thread: http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=35659

Dublin:
A gate to Chester, in the top right corner, and lane project down towards the Essex

Chester:
A terraformable moon for that gas giant, and a Planetform survey station, a BMM military shipyards, as well as a gate project.

Manchester
Addition of a Gateway Base, opposite Sheffield.

Newcastle
Lane and gate to Cortez, Carlile eventually habitable. There's rumors about work being done on Carlile, and the Cortez gate would improve playerflow through newcastle. Kuriane suspects it wont mess up the trade routes much because of the size of Newcastle


All of the tradelanes/Gates should start as projects for a mod, then later become active bit by bit. The bases should hopefully expand over time, as well.

=========================================

We are open to discussing changes to unlawful bases however the community believes they might work.

Anything related to Edinburgh, please discuss in the seperate thread here: http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=35659

If Seth would care to make a start on the above, we can see what the results look like and then discuss them in more depth. An additional Swansea system is also an interesting idea worth looking at. I beleive Baconsoda also has plans for Poole, which should eventually be included into the whole project.

Sir Stanley Nelson
[Image: kbeb.png][Image: dscz.jpg][Image: 19979982.jpg][Image: nsm.png][Image: gcak.jpg][Image: harvsu.png][Image: taui.png][Image: frcl.png]
[Image: BAF_1_FltAdm.jpg]
[Image: BAF_2.jpg]
[Image: BAF_3.jpg]
<span style="color:#000066">Charles Canning [Image: 1-2.png]</span><span style="color:#000066"> Foreign Secretary</span>
  Reply  
Offline mwerte
04-08-2009, 02:38 PM,
#64
Old Man
Posts: 4,049
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2007

sounds fun. After Liberty got zomg lots of new systems, this is very welcome.


  Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
04-08-2009, 02:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-08-2009, 02:46 PM by bluntpencil2001.)
#65
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

Also on the Gaians, they're often used as an excuse by Planetform for their own screw ups, despite them not being as big a threat as they think.

'Ah, well, work is behind schhedule...'

'Why?'

'Terrorists?'

'Right, okay, I'll let you get back to sleep then.'

Also: LOL @ public support. They're treasonous, murdering terrorists, as well as being the educated elite, who are never popular.

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Xing
04-08-2009, 03:13 PM,
#66
Member
Posts: 5,274
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2007

Aren't people educated to be eco-friendly? Well anyway... not worth dying for certainly.

[Image: audrey03a.png]
  Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
04-08-2009, 03:17 PM,
#67
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

Not everyone is educated.

Regardless, the people would see the Gaians as lunatics that were bombing things to achieve something the government is already trying (New London used to be almost as bad as Leeds on the Planet, for instance). And I doubt they care about the evils of terraforming, seeing as Harris and Ayr were uninhabited by any lifeforms beforehand (OMG, they're bringing life to a rock! I'm going to give money to terrorists! Whoo!).

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline beander2
04-08-2009, 03:18 PM,
#68
Member
Posts: 759
Threads: 38
Joined: Mar 2008

I think the list of noncontroversial items is an excellent starting point. Most of this discussion has been over only one set of items; there's plenty else to do in the meantime.

On the Swansea idea, let's at least allow the shipyard to be general and not a Bowex shipyard. It's awkward enough that Gateway has to go to Scarborough to get its larger vessels.

[Image: kbeb.png] Sir Alisdair Buchanan, KBE ~ Gateway)Trafalgar

[Image: Gateway-fin.png]
  Reply  
Offline Kambei
04-08-2009, 03:22 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-08-2009, 03:23 PM by Kambei.)
#69
Member
Posts: 1,115
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:In Leeds:
An ALG base of some sort, for cleaning up the mess. They're getting a zone for mining toxic waste there, and they're a vanilla ally of Gateway.

ALG is private company same as in RL for example Nokia. I am not sure if it is in their interest invest money in warzone where can be easily harmed/destroyed their facilities and injured/killed their employes. Also clean mess of war during war is little bit senseless. Maybe after war but not now. I dont see any ZOI or lore problem for ALG here, but logic of that now during invasion is phail.

Leeds was changed enough imo in .85.

[Image: velryba5eo0.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Seth Karlo
04-08-2009, 03:38 PM,
#70
Member
Posts: 2,985
Threads: 141
Joined: Apr 2008

I'll make a start.

[Image: SethSig.png]
Signature by Sleipnir.
  Reply  
Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 12 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode