• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 28 Next »
"Cutlass" Bomber

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (17): « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 17 Next »
Thread Closed 
"Cutlass" Bomber
Offline Seth Karlo
05-31-2009, 08:45 PM,
#91
Member
Posts: 2,985
Threads: 141
Joined: Apr 2008

I think it should be heavier than the current model.

I personally didn't like the LPI bomber at all, I thought it was pretty ugly to be honest, but you are getting a lot better with every model you make. My suggestion would be to add a few more bit onto it. The Stilleto isn't a straight down bit from the dagger, it has a wide bit on the bottom... Perhaps adding small sticky out bits might work? I'm not sure, but it's a Sabre with a bomber powerplant in my opinion, and it will have bomber strafing and turning, which will just be weird on such a light ship.

Seth

[Image: SethSig.png]
Signature by Sleipnir.
 
Offline gezza999
05-31-2009, 09:09 PM,
#92
Member
Posts: 935
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2006

' Wrote:I think it should be heavier than the current model.
Err, the Falcata in use now or the latest model that Nighthawk has designed?

This is my signature.
 
Offline Grumblesaur
05-31-2009, 09:28 PM,
#93
Fleet Tender
Posts: 2,742
Threads: 56
Joined: Sep 2008

Maybe move the torp pods in the space between the wings and the fuselage?

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
Offline n1kodemus
05-31-2009, 09:41 PM,
#94
Member
Posts: 394
Threads: 17
Joined: Apr 2009

Looks way better than the Falcata.
Fits the BW series fighters very well, as it's meant to.

I'd love to see the Falcata replaced by that.
Offline Eppy
05-31-2009, 10:00 PM,
#95
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

' Wrote:Cinquedea (long dagger/short sword).
Curtana (ceremonial sword).

Curtana's taken, that's what I'm using for my bomber.

Anyways. I actually really like this model, and I think it will make a fine Borderworlds Bomber (which is great as long as it doesn't intrude upon the Outcasthood of my bomber). I will agree with the statement that it needs to be bulked up, though, and also, I think it would be advantageous to connect the new upper extension of the spoilers to the hull via some miniature analogy to the larger protrusion below the Boderworlds base, as well as move the upper parts forward a bit so it isn't so heavily angled. I really like the way you've replaced the natural protrusions on the Sabre's spoiler with the torpedo pods, that's a very nice tough. You shouldn't add any additional engines, though, as beyond a certain size I think it just becomes wasteful and ruins the nice balance the model has. Besides, it's a bomber, it has to be marginally slower than its VHF counterpart.

For the record, since the Waran is the true Borderworlds bomber and the only reason anybody flies that thing is for shock value, I think it should replace that, and my bomber replace the Falcatta. The Outcasts that don't like mine can have their pick of the two, since they're both certainly within the Outcast's traditional purchasing reach, and nobody has to buy the Waran anymore.

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Offline Benjamin
06-01-2009, 02:17 AM,
#96
Member
Posts: 1,794
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2009

There's a bunch of problems with that Eppy. For one, the falcata is a borderworlds bomber, so replacing it with your own would, as petr pointed out, force all non-outcasts who currently have the falcata to switch and buy a new one, not to mention replacing the ship on eltmann with something else that fits.
Plus replacing the Waran with this one would require a lot of stat changes, since the Waran is an extremely heavy bomber. And, with the Waran being a really heavy bomber, it has different uses to this little 48k thing, and it's actually a very good anti-cap bomber now, that is being used by a bunch of people.

Whereas replacing the falcata model with this one, and then putting your one in as a new ship, requires no changing of currently existing stuff.

Join Cryer Pharmaceuticals
Offline tansytansey
06-01-2009, 05:09 AM,
#97
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:Curtana's taken, that's what I'm using for my bomber.

Anyways. I actually really like this model, and I think it will make a fine Borderworlds Bomber (which is great as long as it doesn't intrude upon the Outcasthood of my bomber).
I can see it being a problem, if one of the two bombers is better than the other. Might I suggest we give your bomber slightly better stats (To encourage Outcasts to use it over my model.) but make it Outcast-Only in the info card? That way folks won't lean towards either the OC bomber or the BW bomber for PvP advantages.

Quote:I will agree with the statement that it needs to be bulked up, though, and also, I think it would be advantageous to connect the new upper extension of the spoilers to the hull via some miniature analogy to the larger protrusion below the Boderworlds base, as well as move the upper parts forward a bit so it isn't so heavily angled.
I understand what everyone is saying about beefing up the model. But I honestly don't see a reasonable way to do it without making the model look like crap. The BW design is sleek and pointy, I don't want to draw away from that. I've already made the upper spoiler thicker (though haven't uploaded a new picture of that, since it's a minor change) but other than that, I don't know what to do.

Quote:I really like the way you've replaced the natural protrusions on the Sabre's spoiler with the torpedo pods, that's a very nice tough. You shouldn't add any additional engines, though, as beyond a certain size I think it just becomes wasteful and ruins the nice balance the model has. Besides, it's a bomber, it has to be marginally slower than its VHF counterpart.
They're not torpedo pods, they're engines D:
The current Falcata has 4 engines and no torpedo pods. I intend to keep it that way. If you check the comparison with this model and the current Falcata, you can see that they're not that much different in size from each other. I really don't think it's going to be a problem., this is just a more 'streamlined' Falcata.

' Wrote:There's a bunch of problems with that Eppy. For one, the falcata is a borderworlds bomber, so replacing it with your own would, as petr pointed out, force all non-outcasts who currently have the falcata to switch and buy a new one, not to mention replacing the ship on eltmann with something else that fits.
Plus replacing the Waran with this one would require a lot of stat changes, since the Waran is an extremely heavy bomber. And, with the Waran being a really heavy bomber, it has different uses to this little 48k thing, and it's actually a very good anti-cap bomber now, that is being used by a bunch of people.

Whereas replacing the falcata model with this one, and then putting your one in as a new ship, requires no changing of currently existing stuff.
Makes a lot of sense, I can't really argue with that.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Offline tansytansey
06-02-2009, 12:00 PM,
#98
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

The model is now fully hardpointed, hitboxed and working in-game.

Here's a little preview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JT6GtuZk82s

and here's the hitbox I made for it. How well do you think I did for my first try? D:
[Image: hitbox1.png]
[Image: hitbox2.png]

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Offline n00bl3t
06-02-2009, 12:09 PM,
#99
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

Is the hitbox large?

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Offline tansytansey
06-02-2009, 12:11 PM,
#100
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:Is the hitbox large?
No, it fits snuggly around the model. The large oval you see around the model is the shield hitbox, if you look closer at the model you see a faint outline which represents the ship hitbox.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
 
Pages (17): « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 17 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode