• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 726 727 728 729 730 … 780 Next »
INVOLNERABLE SHIELDS USED BY SF|

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »
INVOLNERABLE SHIELDS USED BY SF|
Offline Aeon
01-18-2007, 05:37 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 237
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006

actually, i have nothing against mmz.

oh, and he forgot to mention that he f1'd in the middle of the combat. i guess having his hull down by about a quarter and him using bots was a bit too much for him to handle...
  Reply  
Offline Dab
01-18-2007, 05:38 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 9,570
Threads: 320
Joined: Aug 2005

Errr, might have missed this, but is there any point where the trader actually consorted with pirates? Like same group, gave money, etc? If there is no explanation other than the same person, then thats not a reason.

I once had an AW and a Phantom char. That didn't mean my Phantom was an AW.

[Image: DFinal.png]
Reply  
Offline onca
01-18-2007, 05:44 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,370
Threads: 70
Joined: Jun 2006

Ok sorry I gonna stick my nose in.

Warhorse, if you accuse someone of cheating:

1. PM to the admins. Do not post in on the forums. Why? Because a flame war is the only result!

2. If you accuse someone you must have evidence. Ie. screenshots.

3. Don't get pissy with everyone in a clan just b/c of one rotten apple. (not saying Cricket is)

4. Don't swear.

5. Don't tell the admins their business. I'm sure that know it very well.

6. Remember this is RP.... [SF] has every right to kick you out of Cambridge no questions asked. If you consorting with pirates or carrying contraband its lucky they didn't shoot first and ask questions later.

Hope all this makes sense.
Reply  
Offline Ant
01-18-2007, 06:38 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-18-2007, 06:39 AM by Ant.)
#14
Member
Posts: 413
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2006

Guess I should post my point of view seeing as I was responsible for the SF order for Warhorse to leave... *sigh*

The situation was that we had known hostile ships, Phantom and HF in Cambridge. Positions unknown.

[HF]Steve.McCloud was asked to leave but wished to switch ships in system.
The request was to leave Cambridge before switching ships.

Warhorse, your support for HF was undermining a valid SF request.
You were asked your purpose in Cambridge and told you could leave when ready. An escort(Cricket) was provided to see you safely out of the system.
If you wished to stay and listen to the RP you could have remained docked at that point until you were ready to depart or the threat was over. The last thing we wanted at that point was more potentially hostile ships in the area, especially a Rheinland Cruiser. We didn't know if there was going to be a shooting match or another attempt at a MOX bomb attack on Cambridge.

As to the modding question, I think Aeon has already explained that he was dodging. Not that hard to do with thrusters.

I have a different loadout that requires frontal attack. That would be why I was much easier to hit.
  Reply  
Guest
01-18-2007, 06:42 AM,
#15
Unregistered
 

I realize That , I Normly have a Decent Temper , And it takes alot Normly To get it to that point .

The Pirate that was thier , was Asked to leave system and on his way out he was telling them that hes going to run cargo , with his Trader Fraction ship . But the SF basicly Kept telling him NO ! That he will be shot on sight should he return to cambridge !

So thats what got me sparked up a little , I had simular problem with =Bsg= Where 1 ship was a pirate and My other was a train . Yet Once a pirate Always 1? ..
Well the =BSG= did see this after , and let it go.
But the SF in this case no.
So i had said in server in system to let him go. They told me i got no athority in system . I said fine !
I also said That I have a Pirate Ship as well , And on this ship my role play is Bounty Hunter Or policing ! I asked am i a Pirate in this ship to, because i have a pirate Ship on a dif charactor?

I Just asked Why? And My Reply was " what buisness you got here ?
My Reply was my roleplay here is bounty Hunter & police , my id tag is BOunty hunter .
Thier reply Was : Ok warhorse Your free to leave system when u are ready !
Everythings fine , till i undock from station !!

Next thing you know i was orderd out of system. So like Wheres the role Play in that?
Next thing you no i was Being harrased and tailed , so yah of coarse i fired to get away.
Next thing you No thiers more of them.
1 other thier more on way , the crickets guys Shields would not go down in the least , the other guys did.
& i Know it was a mod , i cant prove it as i was to pissed to hit print screen , so after a bit i just left server.

Now as far as me swearing in forum , that i am sorry for.
I dont have Proof of this.. As i never took screenshots .. But will next time if thier is 1 !

Im Basicly Not mad at all of SF|CLAN Mainly Crickey & his acumplis , for i dont even remember who he was , but SF tagged !

I had Nothing to Do with any other hostil Ship in the area Or was unaware !

And its Kinda Late For my Warhorse Chars "WarHorse" & "MMZ>Warhorse " As they have Been Deleted from server & starting them over would be Phewww !

I have 1 Other Char Left .. But at this point i Wont disclose who it is..
But i will still play here.

And for Msging admin over this i have .. on the hopes he was online he coulda logged in and checked Crickets ship out for mods..

&
To the rest of you here that realy i guss shouldent of had to read all this stuff , as i was wrong for posting it all the way i did.
Im sorry guys..
chris
Reply  
Offline Ant
01-18-2007, 06:54 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 413
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2006

Sorry Warhorse.

I guess I misinterpreted your response when you said you were a pirate. If you need funds to make up another character to replace those deleted, PM LoganKell ingame.

Hopefully someone else will get promoted soon in SF so I don't have to make these decisions.
  Reply  
Guest
01-18-2007, 06:55 AM,
#17
Unregistered
 

so ant was the other guy?

as this thing with thrusters i dont realy think i understand , as i was hitting him more than you ! and his shields never flinched , yet yours did, and for being hit much less...
thats what makes me suspect a mod. as his shoulda droped as well , and they did not , not 1 little bit.

i had no idea that thier was other hostil ships in area , that hf guy that was thier i understand u asking his pirate ship to leave , but not a trader ship if he so wanted to trade , as than it would be a difrent roleplay. & i felt that to be unfair.

i never saw in chat where u said he leaves system first , than it was ok .. i seen down right no! if you return here you will be shot on sight .. that is what i read..

not to worried about cash.. my other has a bit.. can rebuild rathier quikly

thx n way
chris
Reply  
Offline Ant
01-18-2007, 07:03 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 413
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2006

We wouldn't ask an untagged trader character to leave unless they were openly hostile.
A tagged KoS or hostile character, we would.
In this case, the tagged character was asked to leave. The OOC stuff can wait until the RP is done.
  Reply  
Guest
01-18-2007, 07:12 AM,
#19
Unregistered
 

humm well i dident c his other char.. but he did say its role play was trader..

so what was i to believe?

like my other ship was a pirate the 1 i was in was oposite police/bountyhunter..

missunderstanding?
Reply  
Offline Ant
01-18-2007, 07:24 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 413
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2006

Undoubtedly.
I was trying to think about 3 different things at once and probably wasn't paying enough attention to what you were saying.
  Reply  
Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode