*coughs* Gentlemens, the same happened to RepEx not so long ago. Only that it was GMG which was suddenly bright hostile, kinda making a trip to Kusari a little.... interesting.
Now what, PMed an Admin, got fixed the same or the next day. Please do the same, don't scream around here like that. Thank you.
In a brilliant tactical movement, i charged backwards.
Wait, no, that would be evidence that the admins are doing their job right, and stopping people from having the wrong rep.
Uhuh - and the thing about rep-ninja is that it's tweakable, which means that when things slip under the radar, which can happen - we are able to ammend it accordingly, Like many things round here, things evolve and are works in progress.
But what it can also do is stop folks having a rep they shouldnt have, and getting away with it via loopholes in the rep system.
' Wrote:Now what, PMed an Admin, got fixed the same or the next day. Please do the same, don't scream around here like that. Thank you.
The reason they made a thread rather than a PM is because this keeps happening. None of us have anything against admins putting these into effect, so long as they talk to the PLAYERS who it affects first. That hasn't been happening.
Now that we're discussing rep hacks, how about giving the Xenos one as well. I'm having a hard time keeping both the lawfuls and the unlawfuls hostile, for some reason, the Outcasts are neutral to me, while the Rogues are bright red.
Just noticed those lovely lads the Colonial Remnant have become bright red on my listings...
Amusingly enough, when I researched a bit, instead of a list of their "allies and enemies", FnordNet reports "New Smuggling Route detected".................
Now, the TAZ and the CR have been chatty ever since the time we considered buying neigboring systems, years ago. Even recently we've been on speaking terms..
Someone care to explain, or should I just blame my namesake, Eris?
Wait, no, that would be evidence that the admins are doing their job right, and stopping people from having the wrong rep.
Are you daft? You go into your F8 in game and take another look at lists of allies and enemies. Other than Hogosha, none list Junkers. NONE
I can see, as a way to keep rogue Junkers that don't know how to RP from landing in Kusari, to make a case for KSP. FA and GC have no reason to be hostile with Junkers and KNF makes it extremely difficult to land on FP6 or get to Gallia without getting anally raped by KNF battleships and squadrons.
If one were to make a case for KSP to dislike Junkers, I would hope that it would, at least, be given some kind of role play in the forum that we could all contribute to. KSP is the only one that would need to be wrecked to keep junkers out of Kusari bases, or, at least, the profitable ones.
You do realize the relationship between the Hogosha and the rest of Kusari, right? For example, Hogosha and FA are the closest of allies, therefore FA would refuse to let Junkers dock. Hogosha has their hands in Kusari government, so KNF and KSP would be strongly encouraged to shoot junkers. Blood Dragons are just as nationalistic as the Hogosha, just in a different direction, and they don't want to see Junkers invading either. Hostile. The only Kusari faction I can see allowing junkers to dock is the GC.
If you'd like to do some Junker/KSP roleplay to help set this up or explain it, I'd be happy to do the KSP part.
![[Image: DFinal.png]](http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b328/Luciaden/DFinal.png)
![[Image: malsig_alt1.png]](http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o108/Shamus_FL/malsig_alt1.png)
![[Image: Ocm_siggy.jpg]](http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh305/Gemini893/Freelancer/Ocm_siggy.jpg)
