• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 372 373 374 375 376 … 547 Next »
ENGINE's Idea

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
ENGINE's Idea
Offline Agran Harper
08-26-2009, 12:35 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 60
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2009

Mind, I was only thinking out loud about the possibility of implementation, no tthat it would be acknowledged by anyone, really:D
I don't see different propulsion stuff coming to Discovery as long as somebody agress to free up modders for it.

To hunt the prey is life,
to lose the prey is death,
to hunt the loss is insane...
Reply  
Offline sobuor
08-26-2009, 01:45 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 222
Threads: 53
Joined: Jun 2008

' Wrote:No.

Changing a core aspect in the gameplay and fighting? Noooo. Hard to code and IMPOSSIBLE to balance, we can't even do it with thrusters, because, come on, when was the last time you saw a dude with a cheetah thruster?

cheetah thrusters are the best i us them when ever i can in rp and i used to see them all the time but of lately yes less so and i'm not sure why but any ways yeah i no if not done right it could screw the game and i always said to balance it would not be easy but i feel it would be worth it
' Wrote:Cruise Engine reactivation cooldown: rather unlikely but; perhaps?

reactivation would be a small part but i was thinking if you could stop and start right away
but it would cool faster when shut down and the better the cooling system the longer it would take to over heat
so only fear would be burning out engines from running full out for 2 long
but as i said it needs work

[Image: DRclark2.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline reavengitair
08-26-2009, 01:52 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 108
Joined: Dec 2008

Its not a bad idea - but I would put it only for battleships.

I have a small idea myself that might work... but ill post it later:D
  Reply  
Offline airage
08-26-2009, 02:15 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 99
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2008

Good idea and it would be nice to see but in another game, not FL.
I love the way it is now....
Maybee, but only mayBE there should be upgrades like armor only for engine. Capitals only.

[Image: ordersiggeh.jpg]-
  Reply  
Offline Jamez
08-26-2009, 02:34 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 1,571
Threads: 80
Joined: Feb 2006

Just because Digital Anvil didn't do it doesn't mean we can't. We don't have deadlines.

Upgradeable engines would be an interesting addition.

P.S. AiRaGE, that sig is fantastic.

Andrew Skye
Starflier thrill-seeker

Evangeline Knight
Seasoned fighter pilot

Shinji Takeda
Renzu Corp ex-COO
  Reply  
Offline airage
08-26-2009, 03:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-26-2009, 03:37 PM by airage.)
#16
Member
Posts: 99
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:P.S. AiRaGE, that sig is fantastic.

//sorry for OT

thanks Jamez:)

Anyway, I like the idea of engine upgrades but Id keep it rather simple

[Image: ordersiggeh.jpg]-
  Reply  
Offline Agran Harper
08-26-2009, 04:24 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 60
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2009

Quote:but it would cool faster when shut down and the better the cooling system the longer it would take to over heat
so only fear would be burning out engines from running full out for 2 long
but as i said it needs work
I just browsed the entries of engines and thrusters and the likes of that, and it will be a tad tricky with the running time of the cruise engine. Please note, it was just a quick browse, so that means I could have missed something. Perhaps there could be some timer based stuff, I hope this is doable client-sided and not FLHook dependant.

Other ideas which are possible; you can increase or decrease the time it takes to go into cruise speed, if I didn't misinterpreted the parameters I just browsed through. That could mean slightly decreased into-cruise time for smaller vessels, and slightly longer time for larger vessels, as it takes significantly more juice to thrust a Battleship, than thrust a light fighter. Please bear in mind the keyword "slightly".

What also might be doable is; the energy to fly with cruise engines is derived from the energy that is normally used to fuel weapon systems, hence we cannot shoot while cruising. So, perhaps we might link our yellow energy bar with the cruise engine, and if it runs dry, you stop. This COULD lead to the interesting szenario, that you don't really get far if you try to flee from a fight, as you barely have enough energy to sustain a lengthy flight. On the other hand, I do not want to have cruise engine severely suck away power. I can imagine it to be very exhausting if you have to attempt several cruise activations to get from one end of a system without tradelane connections to the other one... So there has to be enough power that you do not start to hold a grudge against the game.
However, I am not very convinced that this idea would be acknowledged, even though it would perfectly fit into the game, lore-wise (energy from weapons transferred to cruise engines).

On the long run, we might as well as pool ideas, check for possibility, and then consider what might be good, and what not, including balancing attempts, and last but not least; what would be PERMITTED by the Mod Supervisor.

(( offtopic; AiRaGE; thats by far the best signature I've seen in this forum *drool* ))

To hunt the prey is life,
to lose the prey is death,
to hunt the loss is insane...
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
08-26-2009, 05:11 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

The general concept isnt bad but I dont exactly agree with some of your specific ideas, particularly overheating or increasing max cruise speed (if we do this, then players in formation flight will be kicked off the server for speed modding).

My suggestion would be to have several different items which occupy the armor upgrade slot, and provide differing benefits.

Right now we just have armor upgrades, sure they improve survivability, particularly on capital ships and bombers, but there are other tactical approaches to combat which would benefit from something other than an armor upgrade.

So here's my suggested items:

1. Shield Capacitors

Shield Capacitors would replace the armor upgrade when used, and would increase both the regeneration rate and maximum damage absorbtion of the player's shields. There would be tiered improvements, just like we have for armor upgrades, like so:

Fighter Shield Capacitor Mk1:
Increases maximum shield capacity by 20%
Increases shield regeneration by 10%
Occupies 20 cargo space

Fighter Shield Capacitor Mk5:
Increases maximum shield capacity by 100%
Increases shield regeneration by 10%
Occupies 20 cargo space

Capital Shield Capacitor MK1:
Increases maximum shield capacity by 20%
Increases shield regeneration by 10%
Occupies 300 cargo space

Capital Shield Capacitor Mk5:
Increases maximum shield capacity by 100%
Increases shield regeneration by 10%
Occupies 300 cargo space

Of course mark 2 through 4 would be 40/60/80% respectively.

2. Power Cells

Power cells would, again, replace the armor upgrade when used. Rather than increasing survivability, the power cell would increase the weapon energy regeneration rate of a craft, allowing for more constant use of weapons. Obviously we cant make power cells increase maximum energy, because we'd end up with 2-3 SNAC bombers firing all of them at once, or capships firing off 2-3 heavy mortars at a time... way too much burst damage potential. Regeneration, on the other hand, just allows for quicker refire (which is still limited by the individual weapon's refire rate).

Fighter Power Cell Mk1:
Increases weapon energy regeneration by 5%
Occupies 40 cargo space

Fighter Power Cell Mk4:
Increases weapon energy regeneration by 20%
Occupies 40 cargo space

Capital Power Cell Mk1:
Increases weapon energy regeneration by 5%
Occupies 500 Cargo Space

Capital Power Cell MK4:
Increases weapon energy regeneration by 20%
Occupies 500 Cargo Space

Nomad Power Cell:
Increases weapon energy regeneration by 30%
Occupies 50 Cargo Space

The Nomad Power Cell would be usable by any ship, cap or fighter/bomber. Of course, use of such an item would be controversial for any house ship or civilian craft, and it'd go along with the house laws against use of nomad weapons or carrying nomad specimens. Such an item would be more common in the borderworlds for outcast, corsair, zoner, BHG, or order craft, but once again The Order would be able to add that to the list of nomad contraband they are able to demand from a ship (now, being an equippable item, the scanned craft couldnt jettison it - but the order player could force the target to land and unequip the device).


[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode