RP: Presence or quality?

[stardust47]

I was having a think and thought about whether the presence of Rp or the quality of it matters.
To be honest, I prefer the presence of roleplay. Bad RP is better than no RP.

---

[Birdtalon]

Both.

"I KIEYL YOU" Is roleplay. But it sucks, still present though.

---

[Akura]

Want both, the ability to not shoot at red things is nice.

[Alex.]

I'm quite happy with decent quality role play.

[jxie93]

Good RP is always satisfying and rewarding when it happens, but the more it happens obviously the better.

---

*Signature Walkthrough* | *deviantART Gallery* | *Graphics Repository*

[AJBeast]

There is no such thing as "bad" RP. Either you RP or you don't. What most of you consider "bad RP" I consider it as not being RP at all. Having people running around yelling "I KIEL YOUUUUUU", as in-character as it may be, does not indicate the presence of RP but of idiocy.

Meaning I vote Quality.

[Dab]

Depending on just -how- bad the RP is, I sometimes prefer people not talk rather than do such horrible jobs at RPing.

Quality.

Mediocre+ I can deal with. But when it's so bad it's painful, just don't talk, mkay?

---

[Elrainn]

I'm going to have to go with Quality. I prefer silent lolwutts too people who provide minimal RP.

[lw'nafh]

I'd say both, a lot of the older members would know just how much of a lolwut I was. After being exposed to -good- RP, I started to get better.

---

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт

[Guest]

Surely quality indicates presence.....

Meh. I'd prefer presense. With the presence of RP things can be improved. Without it, things can't.