• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 376 377 378 379 380 … 780 Next »
How a player faction excludes a characteristic of the NPC faction

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (33): « Previous 1 … 29 30 31 32 33 Next »
Thread Closed 
How a player faction excludes a characteristic of the NPC faction
Offline n00bl3t
11-07-2010, 03:06 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-07-2010, 03:09 PM by n00bl3t.)
#311
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:because there was lack of communication between freeport 9 and the corsairs in the first place. i take it this was the starting spark for this whole conflict.

then again, i could be wrong.

I agree with that.


' Wrote:Yes, let us Corsairs deal with the Omicroners. We have seen how well that has gone.

On the other hand, making deals of any kind with the OSI and the TAZ has proven to be rather beneficial, and not only for us. Then we see you folks putting bounty on other Zoners and silencing the fellas who do not agree with your ways it's no surprise the talk of deals has gone so "wonderfully well." Incoming excuse that Mike Rotch is not part of the Omicroners in 3... 2... 1...

I wonder why you are emphasising so much on making deals with the Omicroners but not only emphasising on the Omicroners in particular but also to ignore the other groups, granted you are located at the Freeport where most of the conflict is, amusingly the group is the least communicative of all the three Zoner groups the Corsairs have talked to.

Mike Rotch put the bounty on the Omicroners. He has extensive role-play as a former Zoner on FP1 that vacated to FP9 during the FP1 conflict. But, you know, understanding that would involve understanding role-play.

If you cannot distinguish between characters, oh wait, what am I saying, you cannot. Ergh.

Also, Omicroners are in negotiations.

However, as everyone can see by your posts, your tin foil hat is melting.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Kubotan
11-07-2010, 03:09 PM,
#312
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:I agree with that.
Mike Rotch put the bounty on the Omicroners.

If you cannot distinguish between characters, oh wait, what am I saying, you cannot. Ergh.

Also, Omicroners are in negotiations.

However, as everyone can see by your posts, your tin foil hat is melting.

Mike Rotch put a bounty on Gabriel Caudill.

Gabriel Caudill is the leader of the OSI.

The words uttered in the open bounty message was included:

"We will not forgive. We will not forget. We are real Zoners."

In previous transmissions the same words have been uttered, on behalf of the Omicroners towards the TAZ and the OSI. These were in open Zoner channels as well before you scream metagame. Not only that, you are using the word "we". That a character can make a conclusion based on this is entirely natural. But since you refuse to accept this it is unfortunately you who can't distinguish between characters and players.

I'm already aware that the Omicroners are in negotiations.
Offline n00bl3t
11-07-2010, 03:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-07-2010, 03:14 PM by n00bl3t.)
#313
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:Mike Rotch put a bounty on Gabriel Caudill.

Gabriel Caudill is the leader of the OSI.

The words uttered in the open bounty message was included: "We will not forgive. We will not forget. We are real Zoners."

In previous transmissions the same words have been said, on behalf of the Omicroners. That a character can make a conclusion based on that is entirely natural. It is unfortunately you who can't distinguish between characters and players.

I'm already aware that the Omicroners are in negotiations.

Link?

Gabriel Caudill sabotaged the talks on Freeport 9, putting FP9 into a worse situation. I think I already explained this to an Administrator, but no doubt the Hideki police will solve it all. Elementarily, no doubt.:lol:

But, it was more of an anonymous reference for humour, as well as a slight jab at the Administration's no anonymous bounties rule.

If you are aware of negotiations, then STFU.

Edit: We referred to being on behalf of Freeport 9. (Conspiracy, am I right?)

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Kubotan
11-07-2010, 03:17 PM,
#314
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:Link?

Gabriel Caudill sabotaged the talks on Freeport 9, putting FP9 into a worse situation. I think I already explained this to an Administrator, but no doubt the Hideki police will solve it all. Elementarily, no doubt.:lol:

But, it was more of an anonymous reference for humour, as well as a slight jab at the Administration's no anonymous bounties rule.

If you are aware of negotiations, then STFU.

I'm not going to search through the five hundred Zoner threads to find you those words. But rest assured, they were said, I distinctively recall that saying.

"Hideki police", I mean here you are trying to call me out for some paranoid tin-foil guy and you are going here making these assumptions that I'm having a group of people investigating all of your moves. You are mistaken my level of involvement. My level of involvement includes basically, me getting on my Solarizer and claiming eight blue messages. Yes, you can quote me on that any day you want.

I don't really care if it was made as any reference at all, my character made a conclusion. We were talking about distinguishing characters from players right?

Talk of being civil? What is this, telling me to STFU, it includes a swear word doesn't it? No I don't feel insulted, you can't insult me. But, I'm just pointing how every statement you make towards me, just keep backlashing towards yourself. Love it pal.
Offline n00bl3t
11-07-2010, 03:23 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-07-2010, 03:24 PM by n00bl3t.)
#315
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:I'm not going to search through the five hundred Zoner threads to find you those words. But rest assured, they were said, I distinctively recall that saying.

"Hideki police", I mean here you are trying to call me out for some paranoid tin-foil guy and you are going here making these assumptions that I'm having a group of people investigating all of your moves. You are mistaken my level of involvement. My level of involvement includes basically, me getting on my Solarizer and claiming eight blue messages. Yes, you can quote me on that any day you want.

I don't really care if it was made as any reference at all, my character made a conclusion. We were talking about distinguishing characters from players right?

Talk of being civil? What is this, telling me to STFU, it includes a swear word doesn't it? No I don't feel insulted, you can't insult me. But, I'm just pointing how every statement you make towards me, just keep backlashing towards yourself. Love it pal.

So in other words, you are lying? Cool beans.

No, I mean you are trying to police my character's actions. Something which ironically, you seem to be against when it comes to your characters. Of course, the word hypocrite does come to mind.

Yes, brilliant tale about PVP, chap.

No, you made a conclusion. Your character is not arguing with mine here.:lol:(Distinguishing failure much?)

Wrong thread. Go back and reply to the right one.:lol:

Also, you sound like you are re-assuring yourself that you are not being insulted. Keep doing so. I think you need to.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Kubotan
11-07-2010, 03:27 PM,
#316
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:So in other words, you are lying? Cool beans.

No, I mean you are trying to police my character's actions. Something which ironically, you seem to be against when it comes to your characters. Of course, the word hypocrite does come to mind.

Yes, brilliant tale about PVP, chap.

No, you made a conclusion. Your character is not arguing with mine here.:lol:(Distinguishing failure much?)

Wrong thread. Go back and reply to the right one.:lol:

Also, you sound like you are re-assuring yourself that you are not being insulted. Keep doing so. I think you need to.

I ain't lying. I heard the words, but I might have mistaken the source. Might have been from a feedback thread or a discussion thread rather than an actual communications thread. If this is the case, my character can't draw that conclusion and I will change it immediately. I was under the assumption it was since the text itself was of a Role-Play nature. I don't really see people would write like that in an OORP thread.

I'm not trying to police your character's actions, it seems that if my character is against your interest, this is somewhat the case. I'm sorry, but that's called actions and consequences, the foundations of real-time Role-Play.

See first paragraph for your attempt to twist my words about making conclusions.

I'm not reassuring myself mate, I was making it clear between calling out on your statements and it being mistaken for being insulted. But here we go with the tin-foil talks again. Backlash after backlash.
Offline n00bl3t
11-07-2010, 03:31 PM,
#317
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:I ain't lying. I heard the words, but I might have mistaken the source. Might have been from a feedback thread or a discussion thread rather than an actual communications thread. If this is the case, my character can't draw that conclusion and I will change it immediately. I was under the assumption it was since the text itself was of a Role-Play nature. I don't really see people would write like that in an OORP thread.

I'm not trying to police your character's actions, it seems that if my character is against your interest, this is somewhat the case. I'm sorry, but that's called actions and consequences, the foundations of real-time Role-Play.

See first paragraph for your attempt to twist my words about making conclusions.

I'm not reassuring myself mate, I was making it clear between calling out on your statements and it being mistaken for being insulted. But here we go with the tin-foil talks again. Backlash after backlash.

So in other words, you did a search using the forum functions, and your foundation crumbled right?:lol:

Classic really.

Yes, yes. Not policing police.

Amazing anecdote, amigo.

Here you go, re-assuring yourself again. Oh well, I did say you needed it.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Kubotan
11-07-2010, 03:33 PM,
#318
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:So in other words, you did a search using the forum functions, and your foundation crumbled right?:lol:

Classic really.

Yes, yes. Not policing police.

Amazing anecdote, amigo.

Here you go, re-assuring yourself again. Oh well, I did say you needed it.

Yeah, I just went and searched now to make sure. Since I began doubting the source. It doesn't mean anything more than me double-checking.

About the reassuring part. It's like me making a statement, you replying to it. Then me telling the exact same statement again, so you reply to it in the same nature. And then I confirm I predicted your reaction right? What a nice rhetorical trick you have learned, I must congratulate you.
Offline n00bl3t
11-07-2010, 03:38 PM,
#319
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:Yeah, I just went and searched now to make sure. Since I began doubting the source. It doesn't mean anything more than me double-checking.

About the reassuring part. It's like me making a statement, you replying to it. Then me telling the exact same statement again, so you reply to it in the same nature. And then I confirm I predicted your reaction right? What a nice rhetorical trick you have learned, I must congratulate you.

Foundation crumbled, as I said.

Yes, well, repetition works for teaching low-end beings right? (Not related to this thread or it's participants, just something I learned along the way of life.)

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Kubotan
11-07-2010, 03:45 PM,
#320
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:Foundation crumbled, as I said.

Yes, well, repetition works for teaching low-end beings right? (Not related to this thread or it's participants, just something I learned along the way of life.)

"Paranoia." - Hideki Police
"Failure to distinguish between players and characters" - You are making a conclusion based as a player because it was a reference to a certain group, you can't just take that and make a character conclusion on your own that is different.
"Try to be civil" - STFU Hideki.
"Troll" - Teaching low-end beings.

' Wrote:Of course, the word hypocrite does come to mind.
Pages (33): « Previous 1 … 29 30 31 32 33 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode