• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 507 508 509 510 511 … 547 Next »
"Battlecruiser," "Battleship" and "Dreadnought": A Distinction

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 0 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 0 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 0 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
"Battlecruiser," "Battleship" and "Dreadnought": A Distinction
Offline Eppy
10-08-2007, 04:19 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-08-2007, 04:19 AM by Eppy.)
#1
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

I am quite sure I will discover several new types of flames for posting this, but here goes:

Our Capital Ships are All Messed Up.

As I see it, there are currently three types of TRUE capital ships: Battlecruisers, Battleships, and Dreadnoughts. Battlecruisers are, by definition, the size of and as well-armed-as Battleships, but horrendously lower-armored. Hence, I request that we give the Battlecrusiers more firepower, say, four to six BS turrets instead of two.

Battleships are about where they need to be now.

My biggest dig right now, though, are Dreadnoughts: a Dreadnought should be much bigger, much more heavily armored, gunned, and much more heavily priced than a battleship. I currently fly my little Bretonian Battleship, and, though she is not a particularly maneuverable ship, just because she is so small and slightly more well armored (I pack a MK VII, as to most people's MK IV-VI), can fly circles around and easily destroy with quarter-hull-left, an Outcast Dreadnought. There are currently five ships in Discovery requiring the Dreadnough classification: The Outcast Dreadnought, the Kusari Battleship, the Rheinland Battleship, the Battlestar II, and the now-defunct Corsair Dreadnought. For their size, these ships are underarmored, underpowered, and underpriced. In mah Humble Opinion, we need these ships to get another four guns each, a half-again increase in powerplant, a half-again increase in Armor, and a price of at least a billion credits. It will persuade more people to use cheaper, lighter Battleships such as the Osiris and Bounty Hinter Battleship, and leave the Dreadnoughts to the people who can actually pay for them, such as higher-tier players and factions.

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline Qunitinius~Verginix
10-08-2007, 04:56 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,777
Threads: 61
Joined: Aug 2006

I am personally happy with what we have now.

A capital ship is anything that requires a lot of people to operate, basically gunboats and up. The four classes of Gunboat, cruiser, battlecruiser and battleship are all fitted and balanced to how they should be.

It would get a little too confusing if we further divided the ships into more sub-categories.

Verg

[Image: qvsigaz9.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Quigs
10-08-2007, 05:44 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 154
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2006

Could also solve Epy's problem by naming them all battleships:)

CP
Reply  
Offline Igiss
10-08-2007, 07:30 AM,
#4
Discovery Creator
Posts: 3,181
Threads: 578
Joined: Jun 2005

Most of the new ships are named correctly. Vanilla capital ships won't be renamed anyway, since they were meant to keep the names that game devs gave them.

As for separating different ships into different classes by price, this sounds doubtful. They'll still use same shields and weapons, plus have similar number of turrets. What's the use of buying a more expensive and bulky ship then?
Reply  
Offline Jinx
10-08-2007, 10:17 AM,
#5
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

lets say, the naming and description just adds to the atmosphere and flavour of the game. and lets not take it too seriously. They are class/names that the factions give their ships, rather than using an "official classification".

so, the zoners name their battleship "juggernaut" - it does sound big, but not like "i-will-kill-you-on-sight". it fits OK, for a non military faction, but doesn t mean that ship is smaller, less armoured or armed than another battleship. dreadnaught implies the biggest, meanest ship in the arsenal. (whatever you call your biggest ship)

in the end, it fits to the ships in the game. there is the outcast dreadnaught and the liberty dreadnaught. both are the biggest, strongest ships in their factions. And thats about it.

introducing a new, stronger class, will only add to the frustration people have with smaller ships. now its allmost impossible to take down a capship allready ( provided you re on your own of course, in a pack it works ) - there are people that claim they soloed a battleship in a bomber - but i have yet to see that. putting even more powerful ships into the game won t help the balance, even if it made sense in a roleplaying way, it ll hurt the balance.

there is no maintanence cost in the game for a battleship, people can still suicide their damage away ( and its sadly still allowed ) and shields prevent expensive ships from most damage. if there was no autorepair for suicide/death, and a higher repair cost, and only minor shields that protect from pebble collisions. since that won t happen, adding stronger ships isn t a good idea. <-- just my opinion.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Eppy
10-08-2007, 11:19 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

That's pretty much what expected. Still, had to try...

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline McNeo
10-08-2007, 12:08 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

I'm gonna have to say this:

The liberty carrier is the largest battleship that the Liberty Navy can access. And despite being called a carrier, it actually does fulfill the role of a battleship or dreadnought.

My view of a battlecruiser has always been a ship the size of a cruiser, with the armour of one, but the firepower of a battleship. This is what one is, and what one should be. Not the size of a battleship, otherwise its armour would be way too thin.

All this needs is a rename thing.

The Liberty dread needs to be renamed to a battleship, the Carrier to a dreadnought, with other things like that. However, the distinction is not really needed, as we all know what is mean't, and its not really a big deal. I would rather find battleships not to get bounced around by a fighter or rock than the ships renamed. We have bigger things to deal with. This is, imo, not really that important at the moment...no offense of flames intended.

  Reply  
GlyphStorm
10-08-2007, 12:45 PM,
#8
Unregistered
 

Dreadnought = Battleship: info

Battlecruisers: Way more powerful than a regular cruiser, but not powerful enough to match a battleship. Those are used to hunt&kill cruisers, and to flee in case they stumble upon a more potent ship (Dreadnought or Battleship, as you wish to name them).

Battlecruiser: info

I posted those links here to avoid misunderstanding:)

Glyph
Reply  
Offline Dopamino
10-09-2007, 01:41 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 3,522
Threads: 70
Joined: Jul 2007

Can we please make Dreadnoughts bigger? they're supposed to be huge and...they're not.

[Image: GlossyNew2copy-1.png]
I mostly lurk around Media Center these days.
  Reply  
Offline Snip3rNife
10-09-2007, 04:33 AM,
#10
Member
Posts: 212
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2007

I'm personally fine with the way Battleships, Dreadnoughts and Juggernauts are now in terms of the stuff said previously about their size, firepower and relative price to other ships of its class. But the battlestars are way undersized.

[Image: snip3rvolbeat.png]
Known as on Discovery RP 24/7:
Thomas_Hill - Train
[KNF]TakajiKimura - Chimera
You may also know me elsewhere as I'll Begin or something including &quot;Volbeat&quot;
  Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode