' Wrote:Alright, how about explaining to the community your excuse to use an IMG ID instead of a Miner ID? What is the reason behind this, except the extra mining bonuses that you will get, and a bit more cargo hold?
Also, mind showing me the info cards stating you should use the IMG ID on your Hegemons?
' Wrote:nope.
No longer answering your questions Chopper. Not until you go and do some proper leg work.
//General instruction to ALL involved to cease engaging Chopper in any form of conversation/questions from this point on.
Alvin you have some kind of temper controlling issue ? I'm actually interested myself why would you use another factions ID over generic ones.
Yeah remember IMG is Independent Miners Guild. It's an Independent Guild of Miners. Which does not mean that the Miners are all Independent. It means the Guild is independent. Which means affiliating them with the Coalition government would be wrong.
Go play by yourself now, I am done engaging with you in useless conversation.
You understand nothing about the mod, the history and the info cards. Go educate yourself a little, and when you are ready to engage in a proper conversation, come on back.
Sticking your fingers in your ears and humming when you can't counter an argument. That's a fantastic response from a faction leader, if I've ever seen one.
Independent Miners Guild. Guild. That's a group that works together, has their own diplomacy, and their own stations. They are "independent" of house corporations, not on an individual basis. Miner ID is what you're looking for.
Oh wait, Miner ID doesn't get fancy ships and mining bonuses, and we just can't have that can we?
I am sorry, but justification of an ID in this case is not needed.
When you read the IMG wiki (not the player faction but the NPC faction) you will see the following:
The Independent Mining Guild (IMG) is a loose confederation of miners who work those fields that have thus far remained undeveloped by the larger mining companies.
It does not make it one cohesive unit, nor does it exclude others from utilizing the id when it is applicable. I was referring the ID in question, not stating that it was a firm and definate choice.
Now no more questions on the ID will be entertained at this point.
Again, I strongly suggest you read and understand what you are discussing before you post.
Edit:
Quote:Alvin you have some kind of temper controlling issue ?
I am quite calm, I do not want the thread derailed by a triviality. Now if that counts as an anger control problem, then so be it. But really, do you not have anything better to do that engage in a personal attack on me, again?
Simply put, if you want to engage in a conversation, do so. But stay with the issue at hand, and don't complain about what YOU see as a faction id, and what others see as a workable ID solution to a problem. Yes there is a miners ID, yes it is being considered. No this has nothing to do with ships. A corporation has no need for ANY of the IMG ships listed. They are, frankly, utterly useless.
Do we want IMG guns for a corporation? Why, again, they are utterly useless to the task at hand.
No, the IMG ID was merely suggested as a working solution.
Now if you don't mind, can we get back on topic, or do I have to shut this thread down because you boys want to scream about an ID?