• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 140 141 142 143 144 … 779 Next »
Lane Hackers TLagsnet

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Lane Hacker's Tlagsnet
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
A
25.00%
5 25.00%
B
5.00%
1 5.00%
C
60.00%
12 60.00%
D
10.00%
2 10.00%
Total 20 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
Lane Hackers TLagsnet
Offline Vulkhard Muller
01-30-2014, 03:24 AM,
#1
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,365
Threads: 422
Joined: Feb 2012

Seeing as this is still beta and things can still be implemented I feel this debate needs to be brought back up. I have gotten input from sources from Skype to Teamspeak and I have come to these possible Implementations:

A: Lane Hackers will have access to Tlagsnet with in the system they are currently in including Boarder systems such as Kepler,Magellan,and Hudson.

B: Lane Hackers will have access to Tlagsnet with in the system they are currently in excluding Boarder systems such as Kepler,Magellan,and Hudson.

C: Lane Hackers will have access to Tlagsnet with in the system they are currently in as long as they are in proximity(5k-10k) to a tradelane including Boarder systems such as Kepler,Magellan,and Hudson.
D: Lane Hackers will have access to Tlagsnet with in the system they are currently in as long as they are in proximity(5k-10k) to a tradelane excluding Boarder systems such as Kepler,Magellan,and Hudson.


So what do you think? Vote and Discuss.


Sent me a Comm? Haven't received a reply in a reasonable time span? Sorry! Post here and I'll get back to you asap!
Reply  
Offline tothebonezone
01-30-2014, 03:28 AM,
#2
Banned
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2013

Honestly, I'm all for it so long as they're near a lane, and Ageira ID'd chars get a little ring-ding warning when it's happening.

Spice things back up with Lane Hacker and Ageira hostility.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202684
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Thargoid
01-30-2014, 03:43 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 713
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2013

Was actually going to suggest this myself but never got around to it.

I think they should, but only official faction members, otherwise it will be abused, every pirate in Liberty will switch to a LH ID.

LH~ | [75th] | LR-
Reply  
Offline mwerte
01-30-2014, 03:44 AM,
#4
Old Man
Posts: 4,049
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2007

Where is "Lane hackers should not have access to TLagsnet" option?

Because that's how I would vote.


  Reply  
Offline tothebonezone
01-30-2014, 03:50 AM,
#5
Banned
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2013

(01-30-2014, 03:44 AM)mwerte Wrote: Where is "Lane hackers should not have access to TLagsnet" option?

Because that's how I would vote.

Actually it's been made abundantly clear in lore that the Hackers have some access to Lanes.

Maybe a straight up TLagsnet might be a bit strong, but then having them only get warnings for say, the lane they're on, might be too weak.

But either would be somewhere within reason.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202684
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Vulkhard Muller
01-30-2014, 03:52 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-30-2014, 03:52 AM by Vulkhard Muller.)
#6
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,365
Threads: 422
Joined: Feb 2012

(01-30-2014, 03:50 AM)Saronsen Wrote:
(01-30-2014, 03:44 AM)mwerte Wrote: Where is "Lane hackers should not have access to TLagsnet" option?

Because that's how I would vote.

Actually it's been made abundantly clear in lore that the Hackers have some access to Lanes.

Maybe a straight up TLagsnet might be a bit strong, but then having them only get warnings for say, the lane they're on, might be too weak.


But either would be somewhere within reason.

hense why I suggest in system only it limits them and nerfs them Police have access over the whole house why they would have the systems in their ZOI

Edit: When in system


Sent me a Comm? Haven't received a reply in a reasonable time span? Sorry! Post here and I'll get back to you asap!
Reply  
Offline LunaticOnTheGrass
01-30-2014, 04:05 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-30-2014, 04:10 AM by LunaticOnTheGrass.)
#7
Member
Posts: 932
Threads: 134
Joined: Nov 2011

This is suggested nearly every other month, but I do like the idea of the Ageira/LH thing.
Reply  
Offline Nerva
01-30-2014, 12:54 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-30-2014, 12:58 PM by Nerva.)
#8
Member
Posts: 460
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2012

Giving TLAGSNet access to Lane Hackers does make inRP sense.

However, giving TLAGSNet access to a faction that tends to engage in piracy is extremely OP. As a result the only ID that would ever be used for piracy in Liberty is the LH ID. No one is going to use anything else.

The only way I can see it working is forbidding piracy with LH ID and making them work with other unlawfuls. I remember a few rumors about Hackers selling intel to pirates so it makes some inRP sense. It's quite doubtful LH players will like it, though.

P.S.: Good job not providing a "No" option in the poll but having 4 "Yes" options ...
Reply  
Offline Kosa
01-30-2014, 04:18 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 378
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011

I suggested the idea about a month ago and I got similar answers. It would be perfectly inRP. It would be unbalanced especially towards liberty rogues. I like the idea though but some restrictions would make the thing usable while not ruining Liberty Rogues.

Here is my addon to the idea:

- Limit the LH Tlagsnet to 1-2 systems (you suggested that also)
- Make the Tlagsnet run on fuel (Could be the same as for large cloaks. 1 MOX / 3 Hfuel per second) This would prevent every fighter and bomber from using it unlimited but would still allow room for useful operation.


The fuel dependency would also be easy to implement with no need of weeks of FLHook coding.

[Image: unknown_alpha.png]
Reply  
Offline Luke.
01-30-2014, 06:42 PM,
#10
Server Administrator
Posts: 1,764
Threads: 87
Joined: Mar 2013

Please. I'd actually log my lane hacker again.

[Image: 4a0e7968-2678-4a66-9449-352a2bb8d72f.png...fit=bounds]
Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode