• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 137 138 139 140 141 … 780 Next »
Fearless and Corvo

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Fearless and Corvo
Offline NonSequitor
03-01-2014, 03:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2014, 03:14 PM by NonSequitor.)
#1
Member
Posts: 911
Threads: 116
Joined: Dec 2007

I tested out both a Fearless and a Corvo and got the impression that the Corvo is actually a somewhat better combat vessel.

The Corvo's three topside turrets can fire up, as opposed to the Fearless' one topside turret. And that one has a 180 degree arc.

Since the Fearless is more of a combat vessel, I suggest allowing all three topside turrets to fire upwards. 360 degree arcs would be, imo, reasonable.

And could we remove the Q-ship designation from the infocard. It doesn't give a very good impression of devs on this server.

No trolling please. This isn't a debate on whether or not Zoners should even have a destroyer. Please keep the tone civil and constructive.
  Reply  
Offline mwerte
03-01-2014, 07:56 PM,
#2
Old Man
Posts: 4,049
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2007

Let's at least try to be constructive


  Reply  
Offline t0l
03-01-2014, 08:02 PM,
#3
Space Operator
Posts: 1,827
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2013

there's no Q-Ship designation that i can see in the wiki infocards.

[Image: PFjFVMW.png]
Reply  
Offline Moberg
03-01-2014, 08:26 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 836
Threads: 45
Joined: Jul 2012

(03-01-2014, 03:12 PM)NonSequitor Wrote: And could we remove the Q-ship designation from the infocard. It doesn't give a very good impression of devs on this server.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-ship

What's wrong with the current designation in your opinion?
Reply  
Offline NonSequitor
03-01-2014, 09:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2014, 09:07 PM by NonSequitor.)
#5
Member
Posts: 911
Threads: 116
Joined: Dec 2007

(03-01-2014, 08:26 PM)LordVipex Wrote:
(03-01-2014, 03:12 PM)NonSequitor Wrote: And could we remove the Q-ship designation from the infocard. It doesn't give a very good impression of devs on this server.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-ship

What's wrong with the current designation in your opinion?

I certainly learned something new today - thank you. That's the first time I've encountered that term outside of Disco. I was under the false impression that Q-ship was a term of derision (i.e. QQ-ship). I thereby retract my "Q-ship" comment and apologize if I offended anyone.
  Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode