• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Welcome Help & Support
« Previous 1 … 141 142 143 144 145 … 496 Next »
What happened to Colonial BC

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »
What happened to Colonial BC
Offline SnakeLancerHaven
06-26-2014, 10:18 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-26-2014, 10:18 AM by SnakeLancerHaven.)
#1
Volgograd Industrial
Posts: 2,873
Threads: 238
Joined: Feb 2012

Hey I was just checking around on Wiki and saw this ship popping up:

http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Argus_-_IMG_Battlecruiser

[Image: 254px-Argus_Battlecruiser.png]

It says IMG Battlecruiser though it looks clearly Colonial. I guess Sagm IMG BC is replacement??

[Image: ?key=dc385ef2304f0cab6f94da42bc2ff703cf5...5BS0UucG5n]
R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account
  Reply  
Offline Mao
06-26-2014, 10:43 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,680
Threads: 165
Joined: Aug 2009

Yes, it was lolonial BC. It was also used by IMG. The lolonials moved to a lighter capital ship (Thanatos) and the IMG kept the BC format in their minds and created the abomination called Sagarmatha.

[Image: ZZ0gBOD.png]
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
06-26-2014, 10:45 AM,
#3
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,361
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

because a small group of miners needs access to capital ships )))

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Online sindroms
06-26-2014, 10:47 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

Because ex-miners need access to battleships to jumptrade cryocubes from Gallia.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Pavel
06-26-2014, 11:35 AM,
#5
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

(06-26-2014, 10:45 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: because a small group of miners needs access to capital ships )))

omg Lyth stop oorply hating IMG
like using trollships wasn't enough
pffft

(06-26-2014, 10:47 AM)sindroms Wrote: Because ex-miners need access to battleships to jumptrade cryocubes from Gallia.

that too [Image: emoticon-00126-nerd.png]
Reply  
Offline Lord Caedus
06-26-2014, 11:47 AM,
#6
Malta's Bane
Posts: 651
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2013

Honestly it'd make more sense for there to be a Colonial Battlecruiser and a IMG Cruiser instead of the way it is currently.

[Image: eHPLi2z.gif]
Reply  
Offline Mao
06-26-2014, 11:48 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-26-2014, 11:54 AM by Mao.)
#7
Member
Posts: 2,680
Threads: 165
Joined: Aug 2009

(06-26-2014, 10:45 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: because a small group of miners needs access to capital ships )))
Because they're not small at all. Because they got bases all around Sirius in real hot spots. Because they developed capital ships in cooperation with a militarized mini-house and why not use them if they have access to them.
(06-26-2014, 11:47 AM)Max Morse Wrote: Honestly it'd make more sense for there to be a Colonial Battlecruiser and a IMG Cruiser instead of the way it is currently.
CR can't rely on brute force since they've been evacuated from Tau-44. See the fate of the Kronos BS (they went back to the smaller and sleeker Zephyr). Same goes for the cruiser. They opted for a smaller and faster vessel that can hit hard and then vanish instead a battlecruiser that is more expensive to maintain and a bigger and slower target. The Tau-23 is the primary battle area and the asteroids there don't really allow big ships.

On the other hand, IMG can use their BC in the open space of Dublin, Magelan and Omegas.

[Image: ZZ0gBOD.png]
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
06-26-2014, 11:55 AM,
#8
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,361
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(06-26-2014, 11:48 AM)Mao Wrote:
(06-26-2014, 10:45 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: because a small group of miners needs access to capital ships )))
Because they're not small at all. Because they got bases all around Sirius in real hot spots. Because they developed capital ships in cooperation with a militarized mini-house and why not use them if they have access to them.

Junkers have even deeper connections and more bases all across Sirius. Where's our battleship? )))
Same can be said for numerous other factions. Hell, even GMG is more likely to have a battleship, yet, they don't have a single cap. Not even a gunboat.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Lord Caedus
06-26-2014, 12:05 PM,
#9
Malta's Bane
Posts: 651
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2013

You do realise the same arguement as for why the IMG needs a BC can be used against them, most IMG operations take place in rock fields, it's logical to assume that the majority of engagements IMG caps get in are in rock fields, so why not jsut have a standard cruiser, maybe even a heavier one like the RMC. Also by this same logic, since the CR fight in Magellan, the portion of Coronado not in the Barrier Cloud, and potentially Leeds, why shouldn't they have a BC?

[Image: eHPLi2z.gif]
Reply  
Offline Pavel
06-26-2014, 12:05 PM,
#10
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

(06-26-2014, 11:48 AM)Mao Wrote: Because they're not small at all. Because they got bases all around Sirius in real hot spots. Because they developed capital ships in cooperation with a militarized mini-house and why not use them if they have access to them.


(...) IMG can use their BC in the open space of Dublin, Magelan and Omegas.

I must've missed all of that, especially the part about IMG not being small at all.
Please, tell me more [Image: emoticon-00126-nerd.png]

Also, Lyth's right.
caps for junkers!
Reply  
Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode