• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 198 Next »
Engagement rules vs nomads

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Engagement rules vs nomads
Offline Impyness
05-04-2016, 12:27 AM,
#1
BHG; JM
Posts: 412
Threads: 56
Joined: Oct 2013

Mostly looking for a green statement here, I've heard from a few members of infected factions / k'hara that this is generally the case but I can't find an actual statement.

Basically, are factions lacking the needed line in their ID allowed to engage Nomads?

This is mostly for cases where there are factions like the Zoners who are constantly shot at by Nomads as well as others who may not have appropriate lines.

Personally while it would make sense to me considering the Nomads are a threat to nearly all human life, sometimes admin opinions on RP vs ID restrictions tend to vary and I'm unsure if what I've heard is simply leftover from a different time.

#Snakded
Reply  
Offline Antonio
05-04-2016, 12:34 AM,
#2
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,191
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

It's already the case. I doubt any Nomad/Wild will report you for shooting him on any ID, but you still have to do proper roleplay beforehand.

And if only we could have less "wild on scanners", "infected in system, run everyone", "dont try to fool me wild" and similar lines before the encounter even began.

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
05-04-2016, 11:18 AM,
#3
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Engagement rules for Omicron factions in general (and specifically for the event duration) need to be clarified.
A lot of people are walking on really shaky grounds here every single time engagements hapen.
Our current IDs - when taken by the word meaning - are too restrictive to support what is actually happening just now.

Green message please, so the IDs can actually do what is meant to happen.
I think most players want the conflict in Delta and will likely want to keep it on for +1 or +2 weeks.

Therefore all parties in the region need temporary ID clarifications because, let's face it:

> Zoners should atm be able to attack Core
> Core atm should be able to attack Zoners
> Zoners should be able to hunt aliens (they have been blocking DROP very effectively)
> ...

The server event (indirectly) signalled that the conflict is roleplay and that it is "supported", which is really a cool way of doing it.

To give players the security of knowing "I will not get sanctioned for it", green statements are needed that permit the logical acts that are being committed hundreds of times (and that would strictly speaking almost all be violations of ID rules)

Jack

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode