• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 46 Next »
Battleship Scanners

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 7 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 80 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 46 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 10 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (7): 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »
Battleship Scanners
Offline Skorak
08-26-2017, 09:55 AM,
#1
3x Custom User Title
Posts: 4,422
Threads: 503
Joined: Mar 2008

In coordination with the Balance Team, the use of Battleship Scanners on anything smaller than a Battlecruiser is now again impossible. Small ships with a BS scanner mounted will not be able to undock.

This will be put in action next Sunday, 3rd of September.

[Image: 4M4UTts.png]
[Image: IDgpvpG.png][Image: T5nJFSb.png] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: dAW1eot.png111] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: OECngVP.png77] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: 7ODm3kk.png33] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: RKgpLfI.png88]
Reply  
Offline Antonio
08-26-2017, 10:04 AM,
#2
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,192
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

I'd suggest delaying the implementation for a week so people who have their ships on POBs can move them rather than you having to manually address every ship.

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Offline Alex Navajero
08-26-2017, 10:05 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-26-2017, 10:06 AM by Alex Navajero.)
#3
Member
Posts: 54
Threads: 7
Joined: Jun 2016

EDIT: I didn't thinked it through *facepalm*

[Image: hzFU329.png]
Reply  
Offline Skorak
08-26-2017, 10:05 AM,
#4
3x Custom User Title
Posts: 4,422
Threads: 503
Joined: Mar 2008

Fair point. I'll disable this and it will be put in action next Sunday, 3rd of September.

[Image: 4M4UTts.png]
[Image: IDgpvpG.png][Image: T5nJFSb.png] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: dAW1eot.png111] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: OECngVP.png77] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: 7ODm3kk.png33] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: RKgpLfI.png88]
Reply  
Offline sasapinjic
08-26-2017, 10:12 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 1,693
Threads: 32
Joined: Apr 2015

I also suggest big flashy baner in game and in forum to notify people to change their scanners , you will save your self a lot of work when people start whining to help them cause they dint read it and now they stuck somewhere . Aww

[Image: rRK7Pya.png]
[+]Spoiler
welcome to Loberty [Image: qmJkeAC.png][Image: 546f6d6e95.gif]
^ where you can get Freelancer ISO , in emergency

These two spoilers were too big so now they're both one ~Champ
Reply  
Offline Fish
08-26-2017, 10:17 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-26-2017, 10:24 AM by Fish.)
#6
Member
Posts: 826
Threads: 117
Joined: Nov 2015

Can we know a few reasons? Curious. Fighters/bombers are understandable but what about cruisers, (battle)transports/liners and gunboats? Also will the Civilian Carrier be able to have it mounted?

[Image: 8iWW4WC.png]

Please PM me with feedback on my writing!

Reply  
Offline sasapinjic
08-26-2017, 10:29 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 1,693
Threads: 32
Joined: Apr 2015

^ Bustard have BS power core , so i guess it can .

[Image: rRK7Pya.png]
[+]Spoiler
welcome to Loberty [Image: qmJkeAC.png][Image: 546f6d6e95.gif]
^ where you can get Freelancer ISO , in emergency

These two spoilers were too big so now they're both one ~Champ
Reply  
Offline Karst
08-26-2017, 10:32 AM,
#8
Chariot of Light
Posts: 3,014
Threads: 218
Joined: Sep 2009

Essentially, the reason is to give a tangible advantage for the moneysink that Battleship Scanners represent to the largest ship classes which would be imbalanced if accessible to all ships, since better scanners are much more effective the smaller and faster a ship is and the smaller its combat range.

The moneysink scanner for the other shipclasses is represented by the Spyglass Scanner, which any ship can mount and which still presents an advantage over the standard Advanced Deep (15/3.5 rather than 15/2).


I'm open to the idea of slightly improving the Spyglass but it won't be as effective as the Battleship Scanner.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  
Offline Skorak
08-26-2017, 10:42 AM,
#9
3x Custom User Title
Posts: 4,422
Threads: 503
Joined: Mar 2008

This is actually not really on the Lane Hackers. It just reminded the teams that this was supposed to be active over a year ago.

[Image: 4M4UTts.png]
[Image: IDgpvpG.png][Image: T5nJFSb.png] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: dAW1eot.png111] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: OECngVP.png77] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: 7ODm3kk.png33] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: RKgpLfI.png88]
Reply  
Offline Reddy
08-26-2017, 10:53 AM,
#10
Man-At-Arms
Posts: 1,127
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2016

This change is fine. spyglass scanners have the same range, just less cargo scan range. not so bad
Reply  
Pages (7): 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode