• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 534 535 536 537 538 … 547 Next »
Station Turrets.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Station Turrets.
Offline gezza999
09-04-2006, 02:05 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 935
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2006

The turrets on stations are TERRIBLE... They can't deffend themselves atall.I mean soon as ya get into a VHF you can sit outside most bases and the turrets do NOTHING. You can just go AFK or eat some cheese or somthing.

On Excelcia they made the turrets MUCH stronger. The stations KICK ARSE. I mean if you sit outside a jumpgate without movin and it wants you dead, you WILL BE dead. But they made it odd by putting on wierd guns like the Li cruiser front gun and stuff..

Could we possibly just make the NORMAL station turrets stronger? Without changing the way they look?

This is my signature.
  Reply  
Offline Kane
09-04-2006, 02:20 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-04-2006, 02:20 PM by Kane.)
#2
Member
Posts: 1,232
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2005

I think this was disscussed before. Could be wrong, though.

Yes, station turrets in general need a major upgrade. I don't know about the BS Station weapons, but everything else has little effect, even on other NPCs. It would make fighting around bases a much more dangerous aspect for the attackers (Since now the only things that can hurt PCs are other PCs or the MkII house fighters).

This is the real true story of rock and roll; it was not about anything more then, how to live your life, as a gangster, in sartorial splendor, and turning the world into a place where normality would never return again...- Malcolm McLaren
[Image: sigiv3.png]
  Reply  
Offline gezza999
09-04-2006, 02:47 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 935
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2006

Meh. Excelcia has it so all the houses are at an equal level. :P Bases own players and NPCs. Battleships PWN players and everything else pretty much.. and gunboats have the same power as a cruiser aparently.. and a bit.. x.x

Oh, Sorry if this has been talked through before..

This is my signature.
  Reply  
Offline Admiral Yamato
09-04-2006, 03:28 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 118
Threads: 9
Joined: Aug 2006

I agree with you gezza though I do find it amusing to take my time positioning my ship in front of a hostile jump gate with about 128064 hostiles on my tail and not worry about dying.

Returning with a Vengeance June 2007 Sirius Universal Time.
We are coming.


Characters:
BDBC-Yamato - Talarca Light Battlecruiser
BDBS-Musashi - Kusari Heavy Battleship (to be stolen)
BDF-Shinano - Blood Dragon Fighter *
FL-Monarch (to be commissioned) **


</span> The 大和, Battlecruiser Yamato, is Admiral Yamato's personal yacht and primary combat ship.
<span style='font-size:10pt;line-height:100%'>
The 武蔵, Battleship Musashi, is Admiral Yamato's command center and mobile base of operations for his personal fleet.
* The 信濃, Fighter Shinano, is Admiral Yamato's personal fighter and reconnaisance ship, used for backup purposes.
** The Monarch is a freelance freighter captained by Bretonian Navy veteran, William Earnshaw Jr.

Articles of Interest:
Character Biographies & Profiles | Battle of Honshu-Chugoku | Kyushu Police Raid | Project X777 (Part 1)
Project X777 (Part 2) | The Falcon Battalion | The Rescue of Nakazawa
Reply  
Offline gezza999
09-04-2006, 04:22 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 935
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2006

Lol I'm not sugesting we go THAT hardcore with station defences.. :P Just enough to kill a VHF with a good level 10 shield.

This is my signature.
  Reply  
Offline marauder
09-04-2006, 04:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-04-2006, 04:26 PM by marauder.)
#6
Member
Posts: 1,950
Threads: 42
Joined: Nov 2005

Well if we give the station turrets the same firepower the turrets on cruisers that should do the job, maybe throw in a few station class missiles too.

Then again I've had cruiser groups drop a BS shield pretty fast, and no they weren't using their forward guns.

At the moment it seems to be either or both the fighter escort they have and the massive amount of missiles the gunboats can pump out.
  Reply  
Offline Gwynzer
09-04-2006, 05:37 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 109
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2005

On Excelcia, (I will post soem screeneis of these turrets in action :P) dockign rings shoot a very strong gun, that shoots about 0 shots in 2 second, then stops for about 12 seconds. It also has a fast kinetic impact high damage missile launher, and two very strong normal firing turrets.


I think that would be a good idea. enough to destroy a Heavy fighter, and possibly enough to dent a gunboats sheilds.

[Image: gwynzer.png]
  Reply  
Offline Badger
09-04-2006, 06:07 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 245
Threads: 18
Joined: Jun 2006

Doesn't that just encourage even more capship use? Us fighter pilots don't exactly have an easy time against mkII ships and capship patrols as it is... I think, especially taking into account how quickly jumpgates / stations / trade-lane rings turn on you if some random corporation potters by that happens to dislike what you're wearing, that instant destruction of hostile fighters is a little overkill. Sure, they all need bumping up in power but let's not go overboard :0P

[Image: flbadger2py9.gif]

Evil The Badger - Blood Dragon
(NovaPG)-Anaguma
__________________________________________________
Faction Status Page
(NovaPG) Message Dump
Reply  
Offline gezza999
09-04-2006, 06:20 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-04-2006, 06:22 PM by gezza999.)
#9
Member
Posts: 935
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2006

Personally I think that its more realistic. Fighters WOULD get mauled by stations if they just sat there. Battleships wouldn't.

Capital ships are USED to take out stations really. Fighters shouldn't be destroyed INSTANTLY thats just silly. I'm sayin if they stood STILL they would just go boom. Still not INSTANTLY though.

BTW: Wadya mean US fighter pilots? I'm a fighter pilot aswell!

This is my signature.
  Reply  
Offline Hyperwave22
09-04-2006, 06:41 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-05-2006, 04:09 AM by Hyperwave22.)
#10
Member
Posts: 583
Threads: 17
Joined: Jun 2006

I think that the idea would be to have damage increased on stations, not necessarily players' ships.

I believe when we talked about this before, there was the idea to add in chain gun solaris turrets to the station. I think that we could do something similar, but just not the same given that a chain gun solaris turret wouldn't be available to everyone in particular.


Hype

[Image: 2001775094275025807_rs.jpg]
[Image: 771179322673kj2.png]
Retired
A very big thanks to Dark Oddity who put my signature pic together
  Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode