• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 533 534 535 536 537 … 547 Next »
Battlestar Galacitca (MODELS!)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Battlestar Galacitca (MODELS!)
Offline DarkOddity
09-05-2006, 05:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-05-2006, 05:26 PM by DarkOddity.)
#1
Member
Posts: 931
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2006

Ok, Here is a link to Battlestar Galactica Models courtesy of BattlestarGalactica.Com We already have some of them but it would be nice to add some more of them. :)

My Website
  Reply  
Offline Wolfpack98
09-05-2006, 06:49 PM,
#2
Banned
Posts: 1,195
Threads: 84
Joined: Nov 2005

I don't get it. Why ?

We already have five models.. the only one missing is the two Cylon Basestars.. and I honestly don't see them being added, at all.

User was banned for: Compromised account
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline marauder
09-05-2006, 10:06 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,950
Threads: 42
Joined: Nov 2005

Well the ships we have got aren't very freelancerish, but their still here.

I honestly don't see why we need any more ships.

We've got alot of fighters no-one uses, they by-pass them for VHFs, we've got alot of capship choices too now so theres absolutely no need for more ships.

If you can give a reason to add them other then 'why not?' or 'cos we can' then do so.

  Reply  
Offline DarkOddity
09-05-2006, 10:13 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 931
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2006

Well, out of those 5 BSG ships, two are fighters, and 3 are the Battlestar (Why three varients were needed makes no sense, not to mention one of the 3 varients isn't even flyable without admin edit to your character.

Also, I was talking more about the freighters and whatnot, which would be a very welcome addition to FL IMO. Freighters are not something we have a whole lot of choices on.

My Website
  Reply  
Offline marauder
09-05-2006, 10:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-05-2006, 10:29 PM by marauder.)
#5
Member
Posts: 1,950
Threads: 42
Joined: Nov 2005

Possibly because they never get used?

Most newbies either beg for enough money for a BS, which they either get given or they disappear. Or they're loaned/given enough for a train right at the start.

So again, why should we ask igiss to add more ships when alot of the ones we have got are never used.

I've never seen anyone using any homeworld ship other then the huggy, though I did spot once a lone taiidan bomber.

I've only ever seen two original FL freighters being used, once was a dromedary last night in Delta (was trying to kill it) and the other was a daft looking humpback with transport turrets on it at fort bush.

Thats it, in nearly a year of playing on this server those are the only frieghters I've seen.
  Reply  
Offline DarkOddity
09-05-2006, 10:35 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 931
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2006

Part of the problem with everything you said, is there is no competitionf or the Large Train, they need different versions of the heavier transports, things that have pros & Cons, as it stands now, just about all the actual transports have the same insane shields and armor. They need variation, weakness' strengths ect. But it is just my opinion.

My Website
  Reply  
Offline General Nakazawa
09-06-2006, 12:28 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 311
Threads: 12
Joined: Aug 2006

does a armored transport count as a freghter, if so thin i fly one as my yaht

[Image: finalsignature.jpg]
Articles Of Interest: Bio | Capure of the General | The Rescue |"Ultimate Guide To Yakuza" | "The Origens of Aaron Koss"
  Reply  
Offline seanstakes
09-06-2006, 12:30 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 234
Threads: 46
Joined: Jun 2006

is the Battlestar 2 the one on the Bottom right?

My 'Unknown' Characters

Baldomero[TBH] - Titan

Baldomero.B[TBH] - Praetorian (Planned)

Baldomero.J[TBH] - Private Cruiser, Named the Hezamorph (Planned)

Baldomero.G[TBH] - Good Ole' Rusty. (Corsair Gunboat)



[Image: sc22.png]
[Image: vcp6.jpg]
[Image: freelancer_fan_2.gif]
  Reply  
Offline McNeo
09-07-2006, 05:57 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

i think the two freighters that should be added are in the top right then 1 left and top right and 1 down. The 1 down one should have 5000 cargo but should have half the sheild and half the hull of the lrg train (1000 more cargo if my maths serves me correctly) and the 1 left one should have 3000 and have bit more hull and same sheild as lrg train. Just a thought. mabey you agree with me, yes?? :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :D :P :D
  Reply  
Offline Maximilian
09-11-2006, 07:01 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 37
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2006

Hmm i agree with Wolfpack, discovery has enough of these things.
They are odd to me lol.

homemade porn
  Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode