• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 198 Next »
Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5
Offline Kazinsal
09-13-2018, 09:46 PM,
#1
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

The Old Testament of Discovery Wrote:5.5 Connecting to the server with more than one character at a time (Multiboxing). Players who share a network connection and play together must not engage in trading/mining while doing so.

I'd like to propose the removal of the bolded part of rule 5.5. Once upon a time it may have made sense but for some time now we've had flatmates, couples and entire families play this game and are unable to play together because of it. Given the declining population of the game I believe we should revoke this sub-rule to allow for both more potential interaction on the server and to encourage people to recruit by local word of mouth.

Discuss.

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline TacticalNoodle
09-13-2018, 09:51 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 46
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2018

Kazinsal is right.
There should be a poll for it.
Reply  
Offline Laura C.
09-13-2018, 10:06 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

I can imagine compromise in form of a thread where people who play from the same network will announce they will do so and state name of their characters they will play with, so admins can make random controls of logs where they can see if they really behave like two (or more) players or it´s one player running more than one character, for example on his PC and laptop. Usually it becomes obvious sooner or later. Not registering in this thread while doing trading/mining will be still considered as a rule violation.

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.
Reply  
Offline Karlotta
09-13-2018, 10:15 PM,
#4
Banned
Posts: 2,756
Threads: 85
Joined: Sep 2016

Kazinsal is right.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=200950
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Antonio
09-13-2018, 10:32 PM,
#5
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,192
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

Karlotta is right that Kazinsal is right.

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Offline Karlotta
09-13-2018, 10:33 PM,
#6
Banned
Posts: 2,756
Threads: 85
Joined: Sep 2016

And TacticalNoodle too.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=200950
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Backo
09-13-2018, 10:34 PM,
#7
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

I hate agreeing with people on Discovery, but Kaz has a good point. Gone are the days of 200 people around and any extra person that we may get to play this game would be a huge bonus to keeping the community alive beyond the forum bickering we all enjoy.

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline Settra
09-13-2018, 10:43 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 46
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2018

I think we should remove that part of the rule as well. Why limit the amount of people who can play?

My Roleplay


I don't RP. Get over it.
Reply  
Offline Aaron_Cianci
09-13-2018, 11:07 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 272
Threads: 49
Joined: Aug 2018

My husband specifically doesn't play the game because we can't play together, since we're accessing from the same public IP. I would love for him to join me on Discovery, so I am absolutely in favor of this!

[Image: oauVYQr.png]
[Image: 4QJaZc0.png][Image: SE9QS62.png][Image: 41HENna.png][Image: F3FCv4U.png]
[Image: ZqVjjPH.png][Image: i7ONg1W.png][Image: 23AOKf1.png][Image: xSc4RdX.png]
[Image: JKNfDy2.png][Image: iU9EwVS.png][Image: KVFJX2a.png][Image: i643u1s.png]
Reply  
Offline sasapinjic
09-13-2018, 11:14 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 1,693
Threads: 32
Joined: Apr 2015

Agreed ,but with anoucment/aditional rule that if people try to abuse it to play alone with 2 ships to farm money and get caught , get imididiete game ban, no excuse .
That will alowe families to play and scare possible cheters .
Reply  
Pages (9): 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode