• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 547 Next »
Borderworlds Transport

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »
Borderworlds Transport
Offline Mephistoles
12-02-2018, 11:53 PM,
#1
Gas Miners Guild
Posts: 2,346
Threads: 91
Joined: Jun 2013

The new BWT model is great, I'm a fan of it.

Unfortunately, the updated model has entirely neutered the ship's pvp capabilities. It was a great cargo piracy ship that had seven forward firing turrets, but now it has only four. The number of rear firing turrets has also been reduced.

The ship needs its hardpoints altered to restore its combat capabilities to what they were previously. I note Kazinsal has already stated on Discord he will look into this, which is great, however I'd hate for this to get lost in the mix which is why I am making this thread.

Please buff the new BWT.

Sigma & GMG Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/d4j3W4v

[Image: stDvDRX.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Venkman
12-03-2018, 12:03 AM,
#2
Fellow Junker
Posts: 3,496
Threads: 222
Joined: Jun 2011

I totally agree.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206147
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=206210
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline aerelm
12-03-2018, 12:26 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-03-2018, 12:27 AM by aerelm.)
#3
0110000101100101
Posts: 5,265
Threads: 522
Joined: Oct 2009

Both BWT models were submitted with 11 turret hardpoints, which allowed the new models to have the same turret coverage as the old one.

The current ship entries ingame seem to be using only 9 of those hardpoints, which would explain the reduced firepower. Since the hardpoints are already in the .cmp, it'd just needs one of the balance devs to list it in the .ini and the new BWTs will have the same offensive balance as the old model.
Reply  
Offline Goddess Astra
12-03-2018, 01:46 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-03-2018, 01:47 AM by Goddess Astra.)
#4
Member
Posts: 708
Threads: 113
Joined: Apr 2010

I'm also noticing that the turrets that are on the sides don't have 360 arcs, even though there's nothing blocking them from shooting in all directions. Is there a reason for this?

[Image: VuqlNAR.gif]

Freelancer Reimagined: Complete Music Overhaul
Reply  
Offline Mephistoles
02-19-2019, 09:13 PM,
#5
Gas Miners Guild
Posts: 2,346
Threads: 91
Joined: Jun 2013

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2063378

I want to mirror this post as this isn't the first I've seen someone mention it and I experience the same thing. I also want to bring attention to this thread again so the ship doesn't get forgotten as it still needs its turrets changing.

Sigma & GMG Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/d4j3W4v

[Image: stDvDRX.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Dogbite10
02-19-2019, 09:43 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 77
Threads: 17
Joined: Feb 2012

(02-19-2019, 09:13 PM)Mephistoles Wrote: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2063378

I want to mirror this post as this isn't the first I've seen someone mention it and I experience the same thing. I also want to bring attention to this thread again so the ship doesn't get forgotten as it still needs its turrets changing.

+1
The new model looks cool and I’m not trying to knock the hard work that went in to it, but it’s extremely frustrating to fly now.
Reply  
Offline Lusitano
02-20-2019, 12:39 AM,
#7
Storm Chaser
Posts: 1,805
Threads: 192
Joined: Feb 2011

(02-19-2019, 09:43 PM)Dogbite10 Wrote:
(02-19-2019, 09:13 PM)Mephistoles Wrote: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2063378

I want to mirror this post as this isn't the first I've seen someone mention it and I experience the same thing. I also want to bring attention to this thread again so the ship doesn't get forgotten as it still needs its turrets changing.

+1
The new model looks cool and I’m not trying to knock the hard work that went in to it, but it’s extremely frustrating to fly now.

i agree! when it came out, i bought it just to fly with her and ... not even a week later i scrap it for being so disapointed!!!
Reply  
Offline Unseelie
02-20-2019, 12:50 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 4,256
Threads: 235
Joined: Nov 2006

Presumably, this was another strike of the basically everyone opinion that ships with the ability to move cargo should be gimped in combat.

Its a opinion that I am about a thousand percent against, feeling that anyone making a ship that carries goods should also be designed to defend those goods, for a variety of reasons.

Myself, shoot, I really feel as though the ship ought be able to fight off a gunboat.

Reply  
Offline Enkidu
02-20-2019, 01:41 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-20-2019, 01:42 AM by Enkidu.)
#9
UN| Unioners
Posts: 4,082
Threads: 378
Joined: Apr 2013

I certainly feel like the smaller transports should be able to fight VHFs effectively with practice. The big cashcows that exceed battletransport size should probably die when shot, and die rapidly, without escorts. A lower max theoretical cargo in a transport should buy you some survivability.

This is from the perspective of someone who benefits from transports being easy to wipe, since it encourages people to pay the pirate rather than flee.

The flip side is that suitability should be ability to survive engagement whilst running away for long enough to get to the nearest NPC station from wherever you're being pirated/accosted by police/Navy. Transports should rarely be choicey PVP tools, except maybe armoured transports.


Low DPS, but tanky enough for a a VHF to need over a minute to kill by itself, up to five minutes or more depending on competence. Certainly should be able to kill its accostors, but not in burst damage. After all, there are plenty of server rule violating transports who try to nuke the pirate without RP mid-demand-line.

[Image: XTF1d6x.png]
THE SYNDIC LEAGUES
(A co-operative of Rheinland's Shipping Unions, retired from a life of piracy.)
Information | Recruitment | Message Dump |
Feedback | Diplomatic channel
(Links pending redevelopment).
Reply  
Offline Dogbite10
02-20-2019, 06:22 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-20-2019, 06:22 AM by Dogbite10.)
#10
Member
Posts: 77
Threads: 17
Joined: Feb 2012

Can we maybe get the old BWT back either as an additional option to fly, or at least until the new model can be reworked?
Reply  
Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode