• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 31 32 33 34 35 … 547 Next »
Better Bering Suggestions

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Better Bering Suggestions
Offline Enkidu
12-19-2018, 02:01 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-19-2018, 02:05 PM by Enkidu.)
#1
UN| Unioners
Posts: 4,215
Threads: 399
Joined: Apr 2013

So after numerous community complaints (including my own) about the quality of Bering in comparison to discovery systems, it's clear that the majority community sentiment is that Bering needs to change, whilst keeping the features that make it fun.

This is partially because it suffers from the following:

1) It's a vanilla system. Vanilla systems were way more asset efficient than they needed to be.

2) It was designed as a transit system with no reason to stick around. Now it's a major mining and conflict system for lawfuls, unlawfuls, and Quasi lawfuls.

3) It now has amazing jump hole connections and is one of the most frequently travelled independent worlds. It's a bottleneck.


The basic premise of Bering - asteroids over most of the system around a central star, no terrestrial planets, crawling with pirates, is a good one. What would you like to see in a New Bering, without changing any of the dockables? Feel free to suggest adding/changing/removing solars, fields, colour schemes, particles, wrecks, station wrecks, baxter objects, protoplanets, big-ass rocks, anything you like.


The intent is to make the system as content rich as Thuringia or Kansas, with similar verticality to a system such as Zurich to better monopolise on Bering's small 15 by 15 grids. This will be more than just a visual pass. It will be a re-imagining and an attempt to improve rather than a retcon.


I'll try to compromise between all suggestions, will get back with a finished outcome, and then send the package off to the System devs. Whilst this isn't an officially sponsored project they have voiced interest in seeing what the outcome is, and support the idea of a Bering revamp.

Wild and crazy ideas are completely encouraged.


Some ideas I've been playing with:

https://i.imgur.com/jFHKiEM.png

https://i.imgur.com/y6O9wzt.png

https://i.imgur.com/aDh2Coy.png

https://i.imgur.com/05T490M.png

https://i.imgur.com/W4jgueR.png

[Image: XTF1d6x.png]
THE SYNDIC LEAGUES
(A co-operative of Rheinland's outlawed trade unions, determined to take the underworld for themselves.)
Information | Recruitment | Message Dump |
Feedback | Diplomatic channel
(Links pending redevelopment).
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
12-19-2018, 02:57 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

That last one looks interesting. Whatever you do, DO NOT add more ice asteroids, those things are everywhere in disco.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline DarkTails
12-19-2018, 04:02 PM,
#3
Goddess of Boop
Posts: 1,775
Threads: 115
Joined: Aug 2016

The southern zone needs to look more like a warzone. Scattered pockets of mines, the occasional wrecked fighter. Bering lacks the look of an active combat zone. Ofcourse your not going to find static battleships deployed around in a battle line like London, but a cruiser here, battlecruiser there.
Reply  
Offline Alex(Pineapple)
12-19-2018, 04:08 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 260
Threads: 15
Joined: Nov 2017

Yea because it's not. You need to actually fight for the place to be a war zone.

[Image: 4MZbTfT.png]
[Image: 4nvDyxD.png][Image: zPMVxja.png][Image: crAuMXx.png][Image: ZUKB0LG.png]
Reply  
Offline Enkidu
12-19-2018, 04:22 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-19-2018, 04:25 PM by Enkidu.)
#5
UN| Unioners
Posts: 4,215
Threads: 399
Joined: Apr 2013

(12-19-2018, 04:08 PM)Alex(Pineapple) Wrote: Yea because it's not. You need to actually fight for the place to be a war zone.

Not the thread for this breed of comments.

(12-19-2018, 04:02 PM)DarkTails Wrote: The southern zone needs to look more like a warzone. Scattered pockets of mines, the occasional wrecked fighter. Bering lacks the look of an active combat zone. Ofcourse your not going to find static battleships deployed around in a battle line like London, but a cruiser here, battlecruiser there.



A few battleship wrecks with storied infocards would give that appearance. Mines are good so long as they don't obstruct movement, just add atmosphere.

Would Harmony want a Minefield around Marshall? Bear in mind it's something you'd need to think about not flying into.

[Image: XTF1d6x.png]
THE SYNDIC LEAGUES
(A co-operative of Rheinland's outlawed trade unions, determined to take the underworld for themselves.)
Information | Recruitment | Message Dump |
Feedback | Diplomatic channel
(Links pending redevelopment).
Reply  
Offline Enkidu
12-19-2018, 04:32 PM,
#6
UN| Unioners
Posts: 4,215
Threads: 399
Joined: Apr 2013

(12-19-2018, 02:57 PM)Tenacity Wrote: That last one looks interesting. Whatever you do, DO NOT add more ice asteroids, those things are everywhere in disco.

Noted. If I do have ice asteroids they'll be offplane things like comet tails or an above plane field to break up the backdrop. I'm thinking about them as there's elements of the skybox that are a bit ice-y. The majority of the system will still be big dumb rocks.

[Image: XTF1d6x.png]
THE SYNDIC LEAGUES
(A co-operative of Rheinland's outlawed trade unions, determined to take the underworld for themselves.)
Information | Recruitment | Message Dump |
Feedback | Diplomatic channel
(Links pending redevelopment).
Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode