• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 284 285 286 287 288 … 547 Next »
New weapon ideas for Discovery

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »
New weapon ideas for Discovery
Offline Egon Bigmemes
08-27-2010, 07:00 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

Following this will be my current weapon ideas for Discovery. I will make the .ini's, Infocards, and even the models when I have the time. If someone wants to volunteer, go ahead. If not, you all remain patient.



Cruiser/Destroyer Railgun (Or Mass Driver) System (Co-axial Forward Gun)


Hull Damage: 480,000
Shield Damage: 58,000
Projectile Speed: 2,400 m/s
Range: 4,500m
Refire: .05 (20 second recharge)
Energy Drain: 1,200,000

Ammo Dependant
Cost per rail: 100,000
Total ammo cost: 7,000,000

This has been receiving good marks from a lot of people, so I thought I would share it. For such a fast and long range weapon, you may think it has waaaay too much power. But double check the shield damage. It is infact worthless against shields. The recharge also makes it so that, if you miss, you are going to be waiting a long time to fire it again. It uses both energy AND ammo, which is very expensive. Ontop of that, it is mounted like a forwardgun on the Siege Cruiser.

As for the damage: The Hull DPS is roughly 30% less than that of a Light Mortar. This Railgun is about 24,000 Damage Per Second, the Light Mortar coming out at 37,500 Damage Per Second. Less efficient, but it has it's own purpose.

It serves as the perfect Finisher against other capital ships. It also allows for retaliation at long range. However, the projectile is relatively narrow, and has 30-50% less area to "hit" you with as compared to the Light Mortar. Missing is costly, as it would drain an entire cruiser core. As an example, the Siege Cruiser has something around 1,400,000 max power.





Cruiser/Destroyer Ballistic Missile System

Hull Damage: 42,000
Shield Damage: 8,900
Refire: 1.33
Range: 3,900m
Projectile Speed: 210m/s
Turning Radius: .45
Explosion Range: 246m
Energy Useage: 245,000
Price: 2,900,000

Vertically Launched, similar to a Cruise Missile from modern day warships. This is a perfect way to show how much of an Artillery platform that cruisers and destroyers really are. Long range, quick refire, and quick enough to chase down other Cruisers, these pack a whallop against your hull, but are ineffective against shielding, giving you some leeway between missile barrages. At a .45 turning radius, it would be difficult to track even the slightly cautious gunboat pilot, and nigh impossible to hit bombers and fighters. When fighting with others, the explosion radius simply brings out the fact that war is deadly. If your enemies are stacking their ships around their capital ship- Let loose! These will scatter them quickly, and destroy those who are not weary. But be careful, these are also capable of taking out friendly bombers or fighters that may be engaged around your enemies ship.

I wanted something that went boom. Something that wasn't obscenely deadly, but it wasn't entirely weak and useless. That's how I feel about the current missile launcher for Cruisers. Yes, it's highly effective against Gunboats, and sometimes even bombers. But beyond that, the singular missile when avoided costs you a lot of energy. It also doesn't have the long range feel of this system, which will quickly show your ordinance superiority. Part of the explosive lover in me wanted to bump up the damage and radius, but I felt that in the name of balance, it was already large enough. Being nearly triple that of a Nova, you risk destroying your own allies if your attacks are not co-ordinated and precise.




Ship Equipment: Cloaking Array

Now, I know this has been a controversial topic. It can be abused in PvP, and in some other cases. So I've thought up a few ways to fix it.

Cloaking Device
Replaces Armor slot, but provides 2x armor anyway.
Your ship becomes invisible to both scanners and sight.

However, just because you're invisible, it doesn't mean you can't be hit.

Shielding is cut to 1/4 while the cloaking array is active. Hull damage taken is doubled (If that can be done.)
Weaponry is disabled while attempting to engage cloak, during cloak, and for a certain amount of time afterwards

Cloak time for fighters: 10 seconds before engagement
Cloak time for gunboats: 20 seconds before engagement
Cloak time for cruisers: 35 seconds before engagement
Cloak time for battleships: 55 seconds before engagement

During the charge time, and for the same amount of time after decloaking (Basically, 10 seconds before cloaking for a fighter, and 10 seconds after decloaking) your weapons are disabled.
Cruise time is tripled while cloaked. Basically, if it takes 5 seconds for a fighter to cruise without being cloaked, it would take 15 for it to while cloaked.

Fighter array cost: 25.000.000
Gunboat array cost: 50.000.000
Cruiser array cost: 125.000.000
Battleship array cost: 275.000.000





More to come soon.
Reply  
Offline TheJarl
08-27-2010, 07:05 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,855
Threads: 84
Joined: May 2010

Isn't a railgun suppossed to shoot extremely fast?

[Image: yXeeIiN.png]
Reply  
Offline Durandal
08-27-2010, 07:05 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

I'm actually tempted to say raise the damage a tad, if it's going to fully drain a cruiser.

Regardless though, I like the idea of a finisher type of weapon, and if it has those awesome stereotypical BOOM-WHOOOOSH sounds that all railguns should, then I'm sold.

' Wrote:Isn't a railgun suppossed to shoot extremely fast?

Fast proj speed, not refire.
Reply  
Offline Egon Bigmemes
08-27-2010, 07:07 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:Isn't a railgun suppossed to shoot extremely fast?

2,400m a second isn't extremely fast?

Freelancer has its limitatons.

The Light Mortar travels at 600m a second.
Reply  
Offline Blaze
08-27-2010, 07:24 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 63
Joined: May 2009

Awesome weapon man if this is implemented then I will really buy a cruiser..

Awesome weapon man if this is implemented then I will really buy a cruiser..

- Complete Version of Server Rules
- Discovery Wiki
- Tutorials & Support Forum
- Click here for lulz
  Reply  
Offline ryeguy146
08-27-2010, 07:44 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 683
Threads: 32
Joined: May 2009

Never flown many caps, but that is a fantastic weapon. I don't care if I get to use it, so long as I get to watch. Dig the range. Quite the sniper.
  Reply  
Offline Friday
08-27-2010, 08:46 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 1,897
Threads: 76
Joined: Aug 2007

As long as its a forward gun and not a turret this gets my vote!

I would like to volunteer the Dragon Cruiser to have its forward gun replaced by this weapon, courtesy of a continuing Dragon/Order collaboration.

Currently the Dragon Cruiser Forward Gun has a generic Kusari projectile. This forward gun certainly looks the part of a railgun, as opposed to the wide mouth of the Liberty Cruiser.

[Image: GMG_banner.png]

  Reply  
Offline Sebastian Wolfe
08-27-2010, 12:54 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 227
Threads: 35
Joined: Jul 2009

I was thinking a similar thing, actually.

Though, I was thinking calling it a Railgun for gunboats and cruisers, and saving the more potent Mass Driver name for Dread-class weapons of the same line, but I didn't consider giving it an ammo count.

On reflection, an ammo count wouldn't be too bad.

Arms and Legs Guy Wrote:Don't tell them the truth : That in reality you are a potbellied german VW factory worker named Horst.
[Image: wam.png]
  Reply  
Offline Blaze
08-27-2010, 01:15 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 63
Joined: May 2009

I think that gunboats deserve a railgun too.. Not as an anticap but to instakill fighters and bombers in a single shot..

Maybe 100000 hull damage
450000 energy usage to prevent it from being used on super fast gunships

- Complete Version of Server Rules
- Discovery Wiki
- Tutorials & Support Forum
- Click here for lulz
  Reply  
Offline Egon Bigmemes
08-27-2010, 05:04 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 1,691
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:I think that gunboats deserve a railgun too.. Not as an anticap but to instakill fighters and bombers in a single shot..

Maybe 100000 hull damage
450000 energy usage to prevent it from being used on super fast gunships

The thing is though, that, even though Sirius is highly advanced into the space age, Railguns were an un-perfected technology. Meaning, that the guns are big, inefficient, and need to be engineered over many years to fit small craft.

Also for the fact that a gun like that on Gunboats would be downright brutal. A Battle Razor tends to work on Fighters anyway.
Reply  
Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode