• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 379 380 381 382 383 … 388 Next »
Nameing the Bretonian Military

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll:
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Total 0 vote(s) 0%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (5): 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Nameing the Bretonian Military
Offline Unseelie
01-25-2008, 10:47 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 4,256
Threads: 235
Joined: Nov 2006

Not sure if this will be official....just getting a feel.
Please support your vote with a reason.

Reply  
Offline Dopamino
01-25-2008, 10:48 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 3,522
Threads: 70
Joined: Jul 2007

Re-tagging everyone will cause much less confusion.

[Image: GlossyNew2copy-1.png]
I mostly lurk around Media Center these days.
  Reply  
Offline Etaphreven
01-25-2008, 10:50 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 2,773
Threads: 37
Joined: Sep 2007

Voted Two because if you tag everyone the same their task will also change...
For example the QCP's job different from the SF's.
Reply  
Offline Othman
01-25-2008, 10:50 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 2,013
Threads: 49
Joined: May 2007

Voted the first option but heh thats me..
I support anyway you merge these 2 together and good luck with that.

On the uncharted lagoons of anguish, I sail with a canoe made of my sins.
  Reply  
Offline Eppy
01-25-2008, 10:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-25-2008, 10:51 PM by Eppy.)
#5
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

I suggest changing it all to BAF. It looks better, honestly, and avoids confusion. I still have trouble with the less-well-read not making the connection with the [101st] and [202nd]. Huh? Who're you? (switches to 101st) Oh. Duuuuuuuh...

If necessary you could just ad a suffix to the tag, I suppose. [BAF-SF] and [BAF-QCO], or just one-letter tags.

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline Othman
01-25-2008, 10:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-25-2008, 10:54 PM by Othman.)
#6
Member
Posts: 2,013
Threads: 49
Joined: May 2007

Forgot to say.. Name it as BAF or something else and make different division groups so that they could operate in various tasks is what I could suggest..

EDIT: And check the spelling of the thread:P

On the uncharted lagoons of anguish, I sail with a canoe made of my sins.
  Reply  
Offline Unseelie
01-25-2008, 10:58 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 4,256
Threads: 235
Joined: Nov 2006

Right, just saying, so far as I'm concerned, People can be confused.
I honestly dont care about making it 'simple' for illiterates or people who don't deign to read the rp.
Simplifying it, especially if I then have to add subtags....ew.

Reply  
Offline Praetyre
01-25-2008, 11:06 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 1,155
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2007

I don't see a reason why the entirety of the BAF should not name themselves as such.

[Image: Banner-Final.gif] Sig by Blackstarr.
The Man With No Name: Prologue|1|2|
After reading The Man With No Name, please comment here
The Man With No Name's Dramatis Personae (Spoilers within)
Please read
  Reply  
Offline mjolnir
01-25-2008, 11:17 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 3,774
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2007

first choice for me.... it is easier to find targets when they are in the same area of the chat list :)

------
well seriously.. it would mean less confusion.

[Image: sigiw102.jpg]
Igiss says: Martin, you give them a finger, they bite off your arm.
Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
01-25-2008, 11:26 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:I don't see a reason why the entirety of the BAF should not name themselves as such.

NCCs are a bitch. I've already said that less of them is better.

And, Mjolnir, less confusion?

The tags would be less confusing as QC* instead of 6 or 7 letters taking up half the page.

NCCs cause confusion, making group invites near impossible.

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Pages (5): 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode