• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 468 469 470 471 472 … 547 Next »
Capital SML

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
Capital SML
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
05-25-2008, 04:33 AM,
#1
Unregistered
 

ok, before you all say, OMG YOU CAPITAL NOOB! THAT IS SO UBERZORS!
Since the little baby fighters have nuke mines, all the capitals have against other capitals is razors and mortars and those get boring real fast. Why havent there been a nuclear missle weapon? Heck, the 2 novas is basically a nuke to a 4 pirahna squadron... (or more) It could be extremely long range, big blast radius (2K?)and very high damage, 125000, but lower than the Heavy Mortar. One turret of this class and one missle is all that is allowed. The missle is medium speed, Easily avoidable by fighters (all types, and gunboats also). Blast time (how long it damages) should be about 3 seconds. What do you think?
Reply  
Offline ivr56
05-25-2008, 04:39 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,089
Threads: 154
Joined: Dec 2007

So you wan make a nuke?
2K Blast radius is way too big. Imagine a firefight in a asteroid field like Omega 5 during the event. One side brings a BS armed with one and fires it. All he has to do is hit a small asteroid and then boom. No more fighters for either side.

Some Halo Freelancer mods tried it. A tactical nuke. 10 minutes to recharge.

[Image: ivr56.png]
[Image: ivr56.png]
[Image: ptrans.png]
[Image: 3589.gif]
  Reply  
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
05-25-2008, 04:50 AM,
#3
Unregistered
 

Ahaha wow, total chaos. 10 min recharge is a bit much, say 6.
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
05-25-2008, 04:53 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

we need the flash mines from wing commander 4 IMO...

drop one, hit the afterburners, watch the nearby stars and planets explode...

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
05-25-2008, 04:59 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

How is a weapon with a 2k blast radius easily avoidable.

I don't recall any specific cases of death being caused by a nuclear bomb falling onto a person, generally they're attributed to the explosion that happens after the fact.
Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
05-25-2008, 05:02 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-25-2008, 05:02 AM by n00bl3t.)
#6
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:So you wan make a nuke?
2K Blast radius is way too big. Imagine a firefight in a asteroid field like Omega 5 during the event. One side brings a BS armed with one and fires it. All he has to do is hit a small asteroid and then boom. No more fighters for either side.

Some Halo Freelancer mods tried it. A tactical nuke. 10 minutes to recharge.

Lag much?

Edit: That quote by Dusty is awesome.:lol:

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
05-25-2008, 05:11 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-25-2008, 05:11 AM by Tenacity.)
#7
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:How is a weapon with a 2k blast radius easily avoidable.

I don't recall any specific cases of death being caused by a nuclear bomb falling onto a person, generally they're attributed to the explosion that happens after the fact.

That's an awesome quote =P

Think of how unlucky you'd have to be to actually have the bomb land on you directly... even though it couldnt happen because nukes detonate above the ground.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
05-25-2008, 05:55 AM,
#8
Unregistered
 

1 K then...
Reply  
Offline Robert.Fitzgerald
05-25-2008, 05:58 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,727
Threads: 32
Joined: Feb 2008

No. Scrub your mind of the idea, please.

[Image: GatewaySig.png]
~Gateway Interstellar~ Gateway)Gibraltar
Gateway Corporate Profile - Gateway Message Dump - Gateway Recruitment - Gateway Faction Feedback
  Reply  
Offline Xing
05-25-2008, 06:02 AM,
#10
Member
Posts: 5,274
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2007

' Wrote:OMG YOU CAPITAL NOOB! THAT IS SO UBERZORS!

[Image: audrey03a.png]
  Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode