(06-03-2019, 06:10 PM)Wildkins Wrote: [snip]
I was gonna stay out of all this until the hot takes about tech-cells and things we have and haven't done came up.
[/Snip]
About your point on LSF challenger use, and your gunboat.
I do not see how the two compare, one is a request for snubs, by an official faction, through a well written RP post, and approved by the BAF HC in a vote. Here is the thread.
Yes, you said you were going to shoot Unioners/Harmony with them, but you provided reasonable justification - preventing a collapse of Liberty in the south and allowing LN forces to concentrate on Gallia. The RP behind the gunboat I do not know, but I am sure it was requested in advance, and gunboats are not battleships.
Compared to this, we have a Dunkirk, of which I doubt there are more than 50 (and likely a lot less), all engaged in cataclysmic battle against Gallia, and we have one going to fight the Unioners. We received no communication, we gave no approval. I can't see how this compares to your own, reasonable request. There are literally thousands of snub craft flying around houses, we can afford to let a few of them go.
(06-03-2019, 06:44 PM)Spectre Wrote: [Snip]
As far as I'm aware, that request was ignored by the BAF|. There were plenty of LABCs in use during the Aland crisis, so this argument about using them against the wishes of the manufacturer is moot.
[/Snip]
We ignored the 5th| inrp yes, but we did nevertheless attempt to restrict use of LN capships, the only ships present were the LLBC, which had just been released to us - some see it as a Bretonian ship - which is highly debatable. Again though, we are talking about ships that were given InRP to Bretonia, and we got complaints inRP which we replied to. The Dunkirk was never given to Kalh in the first place, so he has no RP backing by BAF to begin with. Can you see where the lines are being blurred about inrp and oorp use? The Aland situation of LN cap ship use was handled inRP.
If it is the desire of those posting here, it is quite easy for us to go against Kalh inRP on this, we tried - as Kalh is a long standing member of the community and not a random - to communicate. I trust there won't be complaints when the FR5 and kill-on-sight order is placed.