Template talk:Faction Diplomacy
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchConciseifying
In my opinion, the diplomacy lists should not include factions that the faction in question has no real diplomatic ties with, is not concerned with, and rarely encounters at all. It's unintersting what the relation between the LPI and Unioners is, for example. It would be more useful to use more general terms to cut down on the length of the diplomacy lists. For example:
| Faction | Relationship | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faction A |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Faction B |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liberty corporations |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unlisted factions |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Criminals |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If we do this, we should create pages to explain what factions are criminal factions, and so on.
-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 04:26, 24 February 2009 (MST)
This will make the template short enough to use for all factions, both NPC and player. -- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 09:43, 28 February 2009 (MST)
