Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gunboats and Gunships"
Exdeathevn (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
GASHERBRUM - Added to the Gunboat list, as the page already existed but there was no reference to it here. | GASHERBRUM - Added to the Gunboat list, as the page already existed but there was no reference to it here. | ||
--[[User:Exdeathevn|Exdeathevn]] 14:12, 25 February 2012 (CET) | --[[User:Exdeathevn|Exdeathevn]] 14:12, 25 February 2012 (CET) | ||
| + | :That was because Gasherbrum was not in 4.85. This page is pretty clearly marked as a 4.85 page. --<span style="background-color: #F89406;padding:1px 3px 2px;-webkit-border-radius:3px;-moz-border-radius:3px;border-radius:3px;font-weight:bold;color:white;">[[User:Alex|Alex]]</span> 16:47, 25 February 2012 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:47, 25 February 2012
Ok, Sovereign opened the debate if GB and GS should be in two different sections or not. I personally think they should be in two different sections, Gunships are actually much more maniable and are having a smaller powerplant than Gunboats. Also, I think there is a reason why the devs called them Gunships instead of Gunboats. "Trackpad.User 14:42, 1 November 2009 (MST)"
Scorpion Gunboat. Tridente Gunship. There are as many exceptions to "gunships are lighter" as there are things that actually follow it. It's a name, and it means as much as "carrier"- that is, nothing. There are no hardpoint differences between a gunship and a gunboat like there are between light fighters and heavy fighters, and you could switch the name without anyone being able to tell the difference. Handling should be discussed on the individual ship pages. --Sovereign 16:51, 1 November 2009 (MST)
GASHERBRUM - Added to the Gunboat list, as the page already existed but there was no reference to it here.
--Exdeathevn 14:12, 25 February 2012 (CET)
- That was because Gasherbrum was not in 4.85. This page is pretty clearly marked as a 4.85 page. --Alex 16:47, 25 February 2012 (CET)
