Discovery Gaming Community
So how are those HFs holding up? - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: So how are those HFs holding up? (/showthread.php?tid=107525)

Pages: 1 2


RE: So how are those HFs holding up? - Lythrilux - 11-20-2013

Give them 355 to 375 cruise speed please.


RE: So how are those HFs holding up? - Blodwyn O'Driscoll - 11-20-2013

Heyna.

The Hyena is still bigger than a templar, its class9 shield doesn't allowa good jousting/boxing tactic.

The lack of firepower makes all succesfull outurning, not worth it.

The inability to fire a tartarus makes the torp Hardpoint almost useless.

To sum up i'd rather fly a hundred time a chamelon than a heyna.


I'd say due to its enormous size, the heyna should be a VHF ( or strap another gun or two )


RE: So how are those HFs holding up? - Pel - 11-20-2013

(11-19-2013, 07:34 PM)Highland Laddie Wrote: I've always loved how agile the Chameleon is. The only crappy thing about it in 4.86 was the general weakness of Gaian tech.

Must agree.


RE: So how are those HFs holding up? - Syrus - 11-20-2013

(11-20-2013, 01:29 AM)Blodwyn ODriscoll Wrote: Heyna.
[...]
I'd say due to its enormous size, the heyna should be a VHF ( or strap another gun or two )
Even for a VHF it's big. But then again, I agree it should rather be a VHF than an HF.


About HFs...afaik the Marauder remains unchanged, that one always did decently alright. Feels a bit like a faster VHF with weak hull, low firepower and a weaker shield though. With missiles now the agility counts a bit less and the hull a bit more. What kills the ship now is the low BB count, which is barely above LF levels.

To the "real" HFs ... I haven't flown any of CD+Torp slotted HFs tbh. I should maybe try one of them though, since I love MRing people...from looking at it, I'd say you are better off with either a LF or a VHF. (Also, there are too few CD+Torp HFs to actually give a good look at them, few people fly them.)


RE: So how are those HFs holding up? - Govedo13 - 11-20-2013

Too specialized for my taste, useless if you are not with perfect aim or heavy MR user.